11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHcoffin arm ball joint splitter
Leading reported evidence
Use ks tools 700.5610
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I have used one of the above pictured BJ splitters with success for a few year but it broke last year and all I could get at the time was a tuning fork type, it did the job (eventually) but I was wincing at hitting it so hard, the boots also got destroyed but I was replacing the arms anyway.
Leading evidence: 'Use ks tools 700.5610' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace arms anyway' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I used a scorpion black and decker for my rear ones with a metal cutting blade to get them out.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I use a snap on one but most of these are similar .
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
This is the one I mentioned above and used with great success and no damage to the balljoint rubber boots thanks to the wider jaw on this particular model.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I have used one of the above pictured BJ splitters with success for a few year but it broke last year and all I could get at the time was a tuning fork type, it did the job (eventually) but I was wincing at hitting it so hard, the boots also got destroyed but I was replacing the arms anyway.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Replace arms anyway
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I have used one of the above pictured BJ splitters with success for a few year but it broke last year and all I could get at the time was a tuning fork type, it did the job (eventually) but I was wincing at hitting it so hard, the boots also got destroyed but I was replacing the arms anyway.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I would be a little wary of using heat as you run the risk of the ali upright expanding more than the steel collar that the conical part of the ball joint inserts into and the collar coming out of the upright still stuck to the bit you're actually trying to remove.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
This is the one I mentioned above and used with great success and no damage to the balljoint rubber boots thanks to the wider jaw on this particular model.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T091943Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi all,
I'm in the enviable position of looking after two Porsches (996 His n 987 Hers) both of which require coffin arm replacements.
Given the amount of time I anticipate lying on my back doing this work I'd like to buy a decent ball joint splitter. However I'm aware that space is tight so not all versions will work, and on top of that I'm sure some versions are a bit rubbish.
Does anyone have any recommendations for me before I start buying things at random off the internet?
Thanks all!
Adam
Try a hammer and if that doesn't work try 2 hammers.
With 1 hammer hit the coffin arm sideways rather than hitting the balljoint from above.
Other method which I learned recently is to stick a hammer at one side of the joint and hit the other side with a second hammer (so you hit the hub/socket the ball joint goes through). Theory being this breaks the seal.
I know this isn't quite what you asked for but I've always found pickle folks useless and ball joint splitters not much better on cars of a certain vintage.
I've done a fair amount of hammering off ball joints in my time but generally not with aluminium carriers, which I'd be a bit wary of damaging with the old Metal Correcting Stick.
I've never used a pickle fork and remain fairly suspicious of them. Was thinking of something like this:
And wondered if anyone had used one that they knew fitted and didn't snap!
Blowtorch a good shout though.
This Porsche tech has a good one by the looks of it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBsS4FWM6Oc&t=200s
It's hard work getting a ball joint splitter in there on the coffin arms and is frustrating.
I did mine with a pickle fork first for the front but for the rears I got the nut off, got plenty of penitrating fluid inside then the nut back on a bit and hit them with a club hammer and they popped out after a few goes.
The biggest issue would be if the eccentric bolts have got fused into the bushes then your into some cutting action. I used a scorpion black and decker for my rear ones with a metal cutting blade to get them out.
Do Not use the tuning fork type that you beat with a hammer .. these can often damage the rubber boot ... fine if you are replacing the coffin arm but for general work then not very useful .
I use a snap on one but most of these are similar .
Spray the rubber boot with something like wd 40 before fitting the ball joint remover .. it helps .
I use a pickle fork and it destroys the old boots every time. This isn't a problem as the old parts are going in the bin anyway. I would be a little wary of using heat as you run the risk of the ali upright expanding more than the steel collar that the conical part of the ball joint inserts into and the collar coming out of the upright still stuck to the bit you're actually trying to remove.
I have used one of the above pictured BJ splitters with success for a few year but it broke last year and all I could get at the time was a tuning fork type, it did the job (eventually) but I was wincing at hitting it so hard, the boots also got destroyed but I was replacing the arms anyway.
I've got an old one very similar to your picture, Halfords I think.
It didn't quite locate fully but managed to pop the ball joints with ease.
I needed to pop the ball joints on my missus old 100k CRV, 2 or 3 whacks with a hammer was all it took, that never happens with a 996.
This is the one I mentioned above and used with great success and no damage to the balljoint rubber boots thanks to the wider jaw on this particular model.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.