fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

2003 C2 front suspension refresh (non.M030)

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH2003 C2 front suspension refresh (non.M030)

Leading reported evidence

Replace i can't be sure

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

I can't be sure that just one shock was replaced,...

2003 C2 front suspension refresh (non.M030)
Frequently discussed work

Clean upable (subject

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

New top mounts, nuts and ball bearing mounts, of course, but many of the other bits look entirely clean-upable (subject to inspection before removal).

2003 C2 front suspension refresh (non.M030)
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace i can't be sure' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean upable (subject' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 14 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 4 other evidence results

Replace rubber bits and ball joints in my suspension

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I replaced ALL the rubber bits and ball joints in my suspension, that involved buying all the arms and inner/outer track rods and engine / gearbox mounts.

2003 C2 front suspension refresh (non.M030)

Clean upable (subject

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

New top mounts, nuts and ball bearing mounts, of course, but many of the other bits look entirely clean-upable (subject to inspection before removal).

2003 C2 front suspension refresh (non.M030)

Replace 'tired' bits, namely shocks + top mounts

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I am working on the understanding that the universally agreed improvement is going to come from replacing the 'tired' bits, namely shocks + top mounts.

2003 C2 front suspension refresh (non.M030)

Replace relatively recently....or is someone going

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

As I say earlier my front springs have been replaced relatively recently....or is someone going to tell that springs get 'tired' as well?

2003 C2 front suspension refresh (non.M030)
Frequently discussed actions (10)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Clean upable (subject

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

New top mounts, nuts and ball bearing mounts, of course, but many of the other bits look entirely clean-upable (subject to inspection before removal).

2003 C2 front suspension refresh (non.M030)

Replace 'tired' bits, namely shocks + top mounts

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I am working on the understanding that the universally agreed improvement is going to come from replacing the 'tired' bits, namely shocks + top mounts.

2003 C2 front suspension refresh (non.M030)

Replace i can't be sure

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

I can't be sure that just one shock was replaced,...

2003 C2 front suspension refresh (non.M030)

Replace relatively recently....or is someone going

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

As I say earlier my front springs have been replaced relatively recently....or is someone going to tell that springs get 'tired' as well?

2003 C2 front suspension refresh (non.M030)

Replace rubber bits and ball joints in my suspension

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I replaced ALL the rubber bits and ball joints in my suspension, that involved buying all the arms and inner/outer track rods and engine / gearbox mounts.

2003 C2 front suspension refresh (non.M030)

Replace then no problem crack

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If yours have been replaced then no problem crack on.

2003 C2 front suspension refresh (non.M030)

Replace top mounts as there is a rubber in there

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I would certainly replace the top mounts as there is a rubber in there which must have degraded, but I am inclined to agree with you about the bearing,...

2003 C2 front suspension refresh (non.M030)

Replace until you strip down

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

It is difficult to say what will need changing until you strip down.

2003 C2 front suspension refresh (non.M030)

Run shocks though

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I'm still running old shocks though because there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with them.

2003 C2 front suspension refresh (non.M030)

Test i hear of people visiting centre gravity

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

The original Bilstein shocks are likely to pass a chassid dynamometer test, I hear of people visiting centre gravity to have ancient shocks tested and they check out fine.

2003 C2 front suspension refresh (non.M030)
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I have previous posted seeking advice about the desirabilty of renewing some of my front suspension .... coffin arms etc. I had lots of interesting responses, even if not all in agreement! The good weather would seem to be mostly over and I am thinking about this job, but its getting bigger! Service history tells me that the car had new front springs a few years ago. I am wondering if at some stage it has had a single shock absorber replaced, because the nearside is in good external condition and the driver's side is rusted to b*******. I know that's not necessarily an indication of condition but if I am going to do the job I am inclined to do it comprehensively. Should I snap up some Bilstein B4's from Design911 which appear to be half the price of many other suppliers @£160 ea ... in which case can someone give some advice about how much of the fittings kit I really need. At nearly 2 x £150ea for these fitting kits I am inclined to reuse existing where possible. New top mounts, nuts and ball bearing mounts, of course, but many of the other bits look entirely clean-upable (subject to inspection before removal). Anyone able to comment on the 'compensating plates' which come in two different sizes? I have searched extensively on the forum for a definitive guide to removal/fitting, but cannot find all I need to know ... anyone willing to share the benefit of their experience?

POST 2 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Underwhelmed by the interest/response to the post I made in September, so I am going respond to my own post (!) with some new info and some updated queries..... 2003 C2 non-M030, 86k I do not have any obvious faults with my suspension, no squeaks/clunks etc (well maybe a bit clunky over cobbles) but I feel the need to renew front coffin arms etc and all the research that I see recommends renewing shocks as they deteriorate over time. Bilstein shocks are outrageously expensive (I have reviewed the dealer prices of Bilstein shocks [just happen to know someone with a Bilstein a/c] and in broad terms they seem to double the price for Porsche and halve the dealer discount). There seems to be some deals around at the moment and I can buy Koni Special Active, 2x front, 2x rear, for £580 ... that's way below Bilstein B4's at £830. (I did not realise that D911 prices are plus VAT, so my enthusiasm for Bilstein, in my first post, is diminished). ..or I can buy a set of C2 Koni yellow for £790, still cheaper than Bilstein. Can anyone comment on this deal .... yes I want to keep the price down, but absolutely not at the expense of fitting anything less than OE quality. Anyone driving on Konis? Anyone able to comment on my previous post about the fitting kits?

POST 3Original post

I cannot comment too much on the C2 kits. I tend to go for OEM where possible, unless you are going for track setups. I used Koni in the past many years ago and they improved original setup (non Porsche). Sure others can comment on Koni's. Personally I would go for Bilstein. However, new shocks will vastly improve tired shocks. Not sure why one shock was changed in your first post as they should be done in pairs on axles. It is difficult to say what will need changing until you strip down. You may find the top mounts ok, but equally need to budget + alignment. It is a good time to purchase with black friday deals, so would revisit some of your last shops for better deals. Sub £800 sounds pretty good to me. At the other end you are looking skyward of £2k

POST 4Original post

I've been going through my front suspension lately and although mine are m030 on my '98 c2, I give the strut tops a refresh. I opted for sachs top mounts which were £50-60 on eBay iirc. I also bought new bump stops at £40 odd I think. £100 down and hardly any farther on. I cleaned and greased the bearings to save buying more. I can't comment on konis or anything else but what I can say is that the small bits add up. It might be a good idea to look more at coil overs as you get new tops on some kits. Again,no experience on this but it'd be worth opening your search a little.

POST 5Original post

I've been going through my front suspension lately and although mine are m030 on my '98 c2, I give the strut tops a refresh. I opted for sachs top mounts which were £50-60 on eBay iirc. I also bought new bump stops at £40 odd I think. £100 down and hardly any farther on. I cleaned and greased the bearings to save buying more. I can't comment on konis or anything else but what I can say is that the small bits add up. It might be a good idea to look more at coil overs as you get new tops on some kits. Again,no experience on this but it'd be worth opening your search a little.

POST 6Original post

Sorry for some reason I keep getting duplicate posts, I think it's time for a new phone

POST 7 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Is there nobody driving on Konis out there? Are they a Porsche no-no or something? I thought Koni were a good make (as if I would know!), and in price terms they can be even more expensive that Bilstein. Great claims are made for these 'Special Active' shocks but I can find very little independent corroboration/review. NedHan79, yep, the 'small bits' really do add up, as I observed in my original post. I would certainly replace the top mounts as there is a rubber in there which must have degraded, but I am inclined to agree with you about the bearing,... cleaning and regreasing should be all they need unless there is obvious damage which I think I would know about already, if there was! Bump stop knackered... happily that and the cover are cheap to replace. fot0, thank you for your comments, I am veering back towards OEM as the 'safer option'. I can't be sure that just one shock was replaced,... I am just speculating about three facts: 1) springs both replaced 5 years ago or so (have invoice) 2) driver-side shock more corroded, externally, than nearside and 3) top mount securing nuts (d/s) are a few mm moved from an earlier position. ...just putting a Coventry postcode in to satnav in case I need it! ps absolutely aware of the necessity of a proper realignment once all is done.

POST 8Original post

Theres a couple on konis here, do a search. I am tempted. Theres an ebay seller of konis thats a good price: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Koni-Spe...ont-Rear-for-Porsche-911-912-996/362377838670 £740, those are for standard ride height to 50mm lowered. Eibach will do you the springs in whatever height you want. I would go for them over the B4s

POST 9Original post

Dunno why some retail parts places and indeed indys with their servicing costs insist on pricing ex VAT, given than we generally have to pay it! Anyway, there is a fella here, hazzarelli, who has bought Koni special actives for his 996, but not fitted them yet... maybe he can give you feedback when he does? http://911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=134647&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

POST 10 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Ah ha... some has actually taken the plunge with Koni Special Active... will definitely ask for some feed back. (thanks for pointing out Robertb) Wasz ... correct me if I am wrong, but Carnewal seem to be doing the Koni SA at 675 euros, delivered ... that's £580 ... (howzat vs. your 'good price' of £740)!! You mention springs in your post ... it appears (and you confirm, I think) that I could re-use my existing springs (non-M030) and remain at factory spec ride height. I am working on the understanding that the universally agreed improvement is going to come from replacing the 'tired' bits, namely shocks + top mounts. As I say earlier my front springs have been replaced relatively recently....or is someone going to tell that springs get 'tired' as well? Would still like to hear from anyone who has driven on Konis for a decent amount of time.

POST 11Original post

I seem to recall Carnewal's prices need to have Belgian VAT added at 21%, so that's 816 Euros, or £700 at spot, depending on how generous your bank is.

POST 12Original post

yup "Koni Special Active" is the new name for their shocks, I don't think there is any difference to the older yellow non adjustable ones. I may be wrong. Yes springs get tired, one of mine snapped! They work harden eventually and corrode (mine were 20 years old). If yours have been replaced then no problem crack on. The original Bilstein shocks are likely to pass a chassid dynamometer test, I hear of people visiting centre gravity to have ancient shocks tested and they check out fine. I replaced ALL the rubber bits and ball joints in my suspension, that involved buying all the arms and inner/outer track rods and engine / gearbox mounts. Made a fantastic difference. autodoc will do you SACHS top mounts for £17, these are OE well the ones sent to me were - they have porsche numbers ground off. I'm still running old shocks though because there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with them. I do have a low mileage m030 setup sat waiting for me to decide if I want that or a more standard setup. Tempted by m030 and 17" wheels at the moment.

POST 13Original post

Be interesting to hear if the Koni active dampers work.

POST 14Original post

I apparently have variants of the FSDs on my Mercedes CLS. I like them, has a surprisingly firm ride for what is supposedly a luxo-barge.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.