14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 buying worries
Leading reported evidence
Use $400
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Heck, even the optional hardtop for the cab can be bought used for $400!
Leading evidence: 'Use $400' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace last week' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I spent $320 on an annual service and oil change last week....
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If he cant change the oil ect, its gonna cost $150 just to do that.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 1 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T155324Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi guys, sorry for being lazy and not searching the forum - just looking for some quick questions. I'm persuading a friend to trade in his Beemer for a 3.4 996. I'm happy with the general worries about RMS etc as these can be spotted by PPI and fixed/walked away from. However, I've read the odd horror story about sudden engine failure with the 3.4 unit - this would be really scary as my friend is pushing his finances anyway getting a 996 and would kill or at last maim me if he was later struck with the bill for a new engine!
So, is this something to be worried about? The car would most likely be quite high mileage (100k) so I figure that it would have blown by now if it was gonna...
Thanks in advance.
This is part of of my research. I can get stats on failures from elsewhere, it's the opinions and advice of those I trust on Rennlist that I'm seeking here. Stop being lazy and give your opinion
Okay. Opinion. Someone on a tight budget should not be buying a Porsche. Forget the horror stories, they only happen to a small number of people, but if they happen to you (or your friend), then they're going to cost you big-time. Maintenance on a Porsche is not inexpensive. Someone who is not in it for the longterm and accepted the fact that it will cost them (I dare not even think about what I'm currently sinking into my 996) should not be in the game.
So your friend is stretching to buy a 100K mile plus used 996? And is worried about maint. costs? that is a nightmare waiting to happen. Though the 996 is a great car, like mentioned above, fixing it and do regular maintenance on it is not cheap at all. If he cant change the oil ect, its gonna cost $150 just to do that. He should look at the maintenace schedule at a Porsche dealer for what it might cost.
Cheers guys, opinions appreciated. He can afford the upkeep, it's just the big scares that might put him off. Being already a Porsche owner myself I appreciate that most models have their scares and it's just the tricky task of separating myth from reality to help make a considered judgement.
Couldn't agree more that all Porsches need and deserve quality regular maintenance.
I still disagree. Regular maintenance includes some pretty big ticket items... let's say that the MAF needs changing, that's $450. The tires will need doing every 2 years, that's $1200. I spent $320 on an annual service and oil change last week.... it can get pretty expensive very quickly. If you friend is not ready for it, then he's going to end up sinking a decent amount of money very quickly.
I bought my 996 Cab with 78k miles. Never had RMS in its history and never had a new motor. It's a great, tight car. Lots of parts can be found at dismantlers for these cars so don't be scared of high dealer parts prices. DIY oil changes are easy and filters are cheap if you buy them online. Heck, even the optional hardtop for the cab can be bought used for $400! These cars are cheap to maintain compared to many MB, BMW, Audi, etc.
Common addage is that there is no such thing as a cheap Porsche. Just because they've depreciated to a price point where people who would normally not be able to buy these cars are now able to enter the market does not mean that it makes sense to buy one. If you purchase one, and don't have the financial wherewithal to repair/maintain it if a major issue occurs, the blame should lie squarely on yourself. A Porsche is a machine like anything else, and a machine approaching 6 yrs and 100K miles can and will have issues.
Well said!
Quick story: In 1992 I bought my first Corvette, new, ordered it, proud as a puppy to own it. It was my daily driver (at least for a while) and I was at the gas station filling up. It was Spring and the car was covered in pollen. Some guy walks up and looks at my car and thought it was scratched, I said no, that's just pollen. He said, "Wow, if I had a car like this, I'd just park it in the front yard, I'd never drive it."
Sorta defeats the purpose, doesn't it? FWIW, I drove the poop out of that car, it became my track ***** and although it had its fair share of (Chevy) issues, I enjoyed it and sold it to a friend who totalled it on the race track, so it died an honorable death, pushing the rev limiter, rather than rusting away from neglect in some climate controlled garage under a cover.
I feel the same way about my Porsches; they have all been on track (except for my current one, which is a cab) and enjoyed. They break, I fix. But I drive 'em!
Michael
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.