15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHwhich remap is best for 996TT X50
Leading reported evidence
Use fearnsport in silverstone and highly
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I used Fearnsport in Silverstone and highly recommend them
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Having my 996TT X50 sorted at the mo with a dodgy MAF sensor etc - once thats done i was looking to have a remap done and was wondering what the concensus was regarding which Company give the best results - I will only be using the car on the road.
Leading evidence: 'Use fearnsport in silverstone and highly' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use car' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Can't reccommend him enough, used him a few times now on my previous cars.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Having my 996TT X50 sorted at the mo with a dodgy MAF sensor etc - once thats done i was looking to have a remap done and was wondering what the concensus was regarding which Company give the best results - I will only be using the car on the road.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Use car
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Having my 996TT X50 sorted at the mo with a dodgy MAF sensor etc - once thats done i was looking to have a remap done and was wondering what the concensus was regarding which Company give the best results - I will only be using the car on the road.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T044418Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Having my 996TT X50 sorted at the mo with a dodgy MAF sensor etc - once thats done i was looking to have a remap done and was wondering what the concensus was regarding which Company give the best results - I will only be using the car on the road.
I have had good experience with DMS in the past with my RS4 which they remapped
I'm now expert but thought that the X50 was a standard turbo which has been remapped by Porsche and then sold as the X50. So doing another remap will effectively 'undo' what Posrche have already done so not sure how much you would actually gain in the end (if anything) :dont know:
X50 has bigger turbos (K24 vs smaller standard K16`s?) and larger intercoolers as well as a remap i think so a better platform for additional tuning - so ive been informed
x-50 996tt gives between 450-470 bhp and about 570nm torque,
i am having mine remapped soon, and should be getting around 520bhp and 707nm torque. :mrgreen:
I've just had mine done by Simon fron e-maps. Can't reccommend him enough, used him a few times now on my previous cars.
www.e-maps.co.uk
is his website. Tell him Graham sent you :wink:
Like I say, I'm just being picky:
[anorak
n]
It should be ME 5.2.2 for the 3.4 and 300bhp not 320.
It should be ME 5.2.2 for the 360bhp Mk 1 GT3.
The X50 TT is 462bhp in RoW models - USA cars are 450bhp.
[anorak
ff]
I had mine live mapped on a 'private road' (better for accurate air flow) by MRC Tuning in Banbury - very highly recommend them, good reputation and have done my last few cars. :thumb:
I am a bit surprised at how many different smaller tuners there are that can remap ecu`s - I was initially thinking about DMS or Revo -suppose that as well as outright performance - the driveability and after sales support is important as well - only Company ive had experience with is DMS - they give a lifetime warranty and when my RS4 needed a new ECU - they came out free of charge and remapped it again - which i thought was spot on
I took mine to Paragon for some Revo treatment last year and have been very happy with it. No flatspots and still very easy to drive slowly around town.
