fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

Supercharger Market Poll

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
25 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHSupercharger Market Poll

Leading reported evidence

Install which is preferable

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Well, for 23k I can get a 3.8 installed which is preferable to a supercharged engine.

Supercharger Market Poll
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Install which is preferable' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install which is preferable' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 25 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

Use by sponsors

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

This data can then be used by sponsors to determine if the investment is financially feasible.

Supercharger Market Poll

Use sc

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Personally, I would like to see this setup and would like to see what power you can extract from the 3.4 by using a SC.

Supercharger Market Poll
Frequently discussed actions (3)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Install which is preferable

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Well, for 23k I can get a 3.8 installed which is preferable to a supercharged engine.

Supercharger Market Poll

Use by sponsors

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

This data can then be used by sponsors to determine if the investment is financially feasible.

Supercharger Market Poll

Use sc

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Personally, I would like to see this setup and would like to see what power you can extract from the 3.4 by using a SC.

Supercharger Market Poll
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

25 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T000231Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

To provide a CaymanClub viewpoint of the available market for a Cayman S supercharger, the following Poll is provided. I would keep the responses "realistic" so that we get a not completely inaccurate picture. This data can then be used by sponsors to determine if the investment is financially feasible. A properly developed and tested supercharger kit is an expensive R&D effort plus ongoing support commitment.

POST 2Original post

Where is the poll ... ? I'd consider one if the price was less than 10k.

POST 3Original post

Voila, you will notice that there is not an option below 10k because no vendor will build one for that, Porsche anyway. Maybe plug it for $10k even?

POST 4Original post

Why not? Superchargers for other cars only costs a few thousand dollars.

POST 5Original post

Does that mean you are finally going to by CS, or you are still "waiting" for Porsche to do X

POST 6Original post

Well, for 23k I can get a 3.8 installed which is preferable to a supercharged engine. I voted for 10k-15k because once you get over that range, I'm 50-66% of the way to a 3.8

POST 7Original post

I kind of have the same thought process, the only other consideration that I would have is that the car now becomes a specialty item for re-sale where a supercharger kit can be removed with car now back to stock.

POST 8Original post

My Active Autowerke stage 1 supercharger for my M3 cost me $7800 but I got it on sale when stage 2 was released. I think regular retail was around $8500.

POST 9Original post

sponsor or no sponsor i don't think paying $15.000 for a mere 80-100 hp is too much...

POST 10Original post

In theory, with intake/ exhaust /chip(tuned) and 0.5 bar pulley, it is possible that Cayman S could break 500hp reliably at the crank (just barely). Probably need larger injectors...

POST 12Original post

Anything is possible. Recall a supercharger must be belt driven. I would much prefer a turbo. Its free horsepower, harnesses the exhaust , not using the engine to lug up the fans and get the extra boost. Either way, w/my 2.7, if Porsche 'did X' I'd drop my 2.7 for that, but ultimately pay for the 3.8 as I had planned to do anyway if I wanted more PWR.

POST 13Original post

SC vs. Turbo Each has an appropriate application with drawbacks on both sides. Either way, once you get past 9lbs of boost on stock high compression NA engines, the internals have to be reworked to support it. A major "boost" in expense. 500hp NA on 91 Octane with no increase in weight. That would be a nice package. Not possible I think, but would be neat.

POST 14Original post

Great participation so far! I am somewhat surprised that we have almost 50% of the voters would purchase a supercharger. More than I expected actually...

POST 15Original post

All of my cars have been treated with either a turbo or supercharger from the factory or my own doing. The Cayman may be next...

POST 16Original post

..you guys need a used vette or old Z28 to play with...why mess with perfection?

POST 17Original post

Interesting thread, I think that RUF kit is awesome, but that's alot of pennies($70k+ for the car & $35k+ for the kit. You could buy a turbo.) I think if VF made one under $10k. That's a do-able & reasonable price. (If we are doing a Group Buy, you gotta let me know 6 months in advance, so I can slowly convince my wife:argue: ) cya

POST 18Original post

Look at how much the 996 kits cost, thats fair. If its going to cost more than 10-12k people will just buy a better car.

POST 19Original post

Better car?! You mean 'more expensive car' right?

POST 20Original post

So far only the RUF has the R&D and installation quality that would make the upgrade consistent in quality and engineering with the rest of the car. But if we're basically talking about a $100K total investment I'd get a GT3 and be done with it. The 295 ponies the car has is more than adequate for what I need the car to do. My previous BMW experience with "modding" taught me that suspension upgrades are the most satisfactory, with exhaust next, colder air a distant third, and chipping just not worth it.

POST 21Original post

your BMW experience is similar as my S2000 though I would have this order: intake suspension exhaust header chipping (full tune on dyno rather just a canned flash, not sold on this one)

POST 22Original post

It seems that the main reason for the high cost of a SC is because of development costs and the fact that the Cayman would be such a small market. Well what about adding our drop top brothers into the mix, the Boxster guys. I'm not that familiar with the Boxsters but arent they for all intents and purposes the same as the Cayman, drive train wise ? And if so wouldn't that dramatically increase the size of the market for a SC, hence bring down the cost? $35K for a SC from RUF is crazy, how can you justify that cost unless its a one off? You can get into a X51 motor with suspension, body, and other drivetrain mods for the same or less at Farnbacher/Loles, their GTR Cayman. I'm new to Porsche and Porsche motors but what is the possibility of boring and stroking the 3.4 CS motor to get you into the 3.8L neighborhood? And 400HP? And wouldn't that be a lot less expensive?

POST 23Original post

I am new to Porsche motors as well and am curious about the boring and stroking option. It is a fairly common occurence in other motors with decent results. It is not inexpensive though but wouldn't cost more than a SC I would think. With respect to Boxster compatibility, it does make sense and I would expect that the potential vendor would have to explore that possibility.

POST 24Original post

I think you mean Air and fuel combustion when especially dealing with force induction, which you need to be careful by using a management chip or properly tune the ECU else you can go rich on fuel mixture or lean which you don't want since it will definitely make your baby go...Kaaboom! Personally, I would like to see this setup and would like to see what power you can extract from the 3.4 by using a SC. However, I know it's a Porche, but the price is rather stiff for a belt, pulley, intercooler and a spooler isn't? My 2cent..... May want to contact some of this guys and present the challenge: Vivid Racing Modacar Hopup Racing APS

POST 25Original post

When determing power on forced induction or engines in general, it is about how much airflow can be pulled through the system. It is a convenient way of looking at it, to make the math rather trivial when estimating power on boost. Fuel can always be pumped in at any rate necessary to match the incoming air to optimize lean/rich mixture, airflow is the upfront limiting factor. Once you have that corrected, then it is time to make the rest of the engine "catch-up" with processing the extra flow. That is why so much effort is done to increase airflow through intakes, boost, intercoolers, porting, headers, exhaust, etc., Ultimately, the engine's strength is the limiting factor for being capable of processing the airflow. Management chip/ECU becomes a major concern when boost gets above 8 lbs/boost typically. 6-7 lbs has always been a relatively safe mark among SC vendors even with stock injectors.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.