911uk

Water ingress conundrum - Not from the usual causes

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

2 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHWater ingress conundrum - Not from the usual causes

Leading reported evidence

Replace passenger door membrane

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Passenger door membrane has been replaced twice in six months.
Original post Read captured discussion
Water ingress conundrum - Not from the usual causes

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace passenger door membrane' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace passenger door membrane' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 2 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace passenger door membrane

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Passenger door membrane has been replaced twice in six months.
Original post Read captured discussion
Water ingress conundrum - Not from the usual causes

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

2 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Outcome without a verified action link
Its still getting wet
Original post Read captured discussion
No unique explicit quoted action; no causal link assigned

Generation: 20261026T165820Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

996 Cab owner with the standard water ingress issues Passenger door membrane has been replaced twice in six months. Once by an OPC and then again by an Indy. Was fine for six months and is now leaking again. Only area getting wet is the door card directly below the speaker area. :?: Rear passenger footwell was also getting wet. indy cleared the drain holes Its still getting wet I have just paid £300 for an Indy to sort this, yet same problems remain :sad: Any body help with where to look next???? Cheers

POST 2Original post

My first call would be to go back to both the OPC and the Indy to get them to resolve the respective ingresses, for which you have already paid. Why should you pay for anything else until they explain why the work they have already charged you for has not resolved the problems. If you are getting water back in 6 months then the membranes were a) Not the cause of the ingress b) Not fitted correctly and have failed c) Supplied faulty so need replacing None of these should be chargeable.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.