15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHHeadlight Refurb - What am I doing wrong?
Leading reported evidence
Use ones
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
£1500 at least for a set of used ones on eBay, so keen to save these.
Leading evidence: 'Use ones' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Recommend wrapping them rather than painting them' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Lightronic's fit straight in, I'd recommend wrapping them rather than painting them to get the amber look back (if that's important to you).
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Has anyone gone 1 step further and changed the projects to something like Evo-X?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Both times they looked like new after a quick rub down and polish up finishing using finer grades of wet and dry and then a polishing compound.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T212127Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
So I have refurbed my headlights twice now on my 996 once myself and once by a body shop. Both times they looked like new after a quick rub down and polish up finishing using finer grades of wet and dry and then a polishing compound.
The problem is they only seem to last about a year before they look rubbish again. Have I missed something? Should they be coated with something to protect them? If so what?
I thought paying a body shop to do them they would last longer than my DIY attempt but no same result and it only lasts about 1 year to 18 months max
So what am I doing wrong?
Winny
A top coat/lacquer to prevent UV light breaking down the plastic.
Halfords do a good heavy duty PU lacquer that adheres well to freshly sanded-down headlights. HTH!
What Rob said.
Get some UPOL clear #1 from halfords
https://www.halfords.com/motoring/p...h-repair-paint-restorers/upol-clear-1-aerosol
It's a bit different to normal lacquers, so don't skimp and get a cheaper one. I can't remember what makes it different. Smells pretty nasty though, do it outside!
I tried to put multiple coats of this on, but kept getting orange peel- so just kept with one coat. It's as good as new after 4 months. That was the first time I've done it though, so it should last a long time but I cant confirm that.
Thanks guys
Thought it would be something like that but I'm surprised the body shop dident coat them after I paid for the second refurb. Looks like I'll be doing a third refurb myself with this stuff
Cheers
Winny
If you pick up a can of UPOL Clear #1 from your local auto shop, or online it, wet sand to 800 or 1000 grit level and rip into it, you will be very very happy with your project.
Warning, at 800/1000 grit they will look milky in colour, but clear instantly when you paint them
If the clear coat has sections that look a different sort of milky white after you spray then hit immediately with a hair dryer - it will clear up within seconds.
You may need to wet sand 800/1000 after if you get an orange peal effect and then polish, but the above paint is very good at not doing this
Has anyone gone 1 step further and changed the projects to something like Evo-X? Mine are starting to show their age with the light pattern getting narrower with strange hot spots on the far sides.
Too far gone?
Hi All,
New here but came across this thread very quickly.
My question is, how do you know if your headlights are beyond saving?
Mine are really milky, slightly over rubbed too 😠from a previous attempt.
I've tried loads of polishes but to no avail.
£1500 at least for a set of used ones on eBay, so keen to save these.
Ooh, and can you fit litronic lights etc (brighter ones) in whatever form to a standard car?
Cheers in advance,
Rich. :dont know:
[Image-only or quote-only post; no author-written text.]
https://911uk.com/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Flive.staticflickr.com%2F4207%2F35608263896_0c12ac1a62_b.jpg&hash=ea128d875a98f8010d5365d362f60066
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.