fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

200 cell cats ?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH200 cell cats ?

Reported or suspected cause

only cost effective proven power upgrade you can do

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

All in all, I would say that it's a worthwhile investment, and probably the only cost effective proven power upgrade you can do on a naturally aspirated 996.

200 cell cats ?
Frequently discussed work

Run with 200 cell cats

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Has anyone done a before and after dyno run with 200 cell cats ?.

200 cell cats ?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'only cost effective proven power upgrade you can do' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'only cost effective proven power upgrade you can do' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Run with 200 cell cats' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 15 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 3 other evidence results

Run with 200 cell cats

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Has anyone done a before and after dyno run with 200 cell cats ?.

200 cell cats ?

Test my suspicion is

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

No Dyno test, my suspicion is that they actually lose you a little torque lower down, but they sound great and look nice so I don't care.

200 cell cats ?

Use stainless replacements

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Use stainless replacements from Ebay, or titanium bolts from Ebay if you're feeling flush.

200 cell cats ?
Frequently discussed actions (3)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run with 200 cell cats

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Has anyone done a before and after dyno run with 200 cell cats ?.

200 cell cats ?

Test my suspicion is

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

No Dyno test, my suspicion is that they actually lose you a little torque lower down, but they sound great and look nice so I don't care.

200 cell cats ?

Use stainless replacements

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Use stainless replacements from Ebay, or titanium bolts from Ebay if you're feeling flush.

200 cell cats ?
Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

only cost effective proven power upgrade you can do

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

All in all, I would say that it's a worthwhile investment, and probably the only cost effective proven power upgrade you can do on a naturally aspirated 996.

200 cell cats ?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T100758Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Has anyone done a before and after dyno run with 200 cell cats ?. I'm thinking of getting a set of the top gear ones , I don't want to go to that expense if they don't really provide any gains . I know the difference won't be huge but a few extra horses is always nice , the original cats look rusty as hell so are probably not in great condition inside either . Would be interested in your opinions on this

POST 2Original post

No Dyno test, my suspicion is that they actually lose you a little torque lower down, but they sound great and look nice so I don't care.

POST 3Original post

I had the top gear big bore 200 cell cats on my gen1 and they were great , I have cargraphic 200 cell cats on my gen2 also great. my gen2 has been remapped and has a full cargraphic exhaust with 200cell cats and its given the car 4% gain in BHP but a much better power curve especially in the low mid range. :thumb:

POST 4Original post

[Image-only or quote-only post; no author-written text.] https://911uk.com/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Flive.staticflickr.com%2F1845%2F29307817927_7651bbbae4_b.jpg&hash=0f75a9f962e44907f411e3c42e152612

POST 5Original post

I did a lot of research before going for 200 cell cats and the reason was that I was able to find evidence on the net from multiple sources that backed up the modest but very real power gain. All in all, I would say that it's a worthwhile investment, and probably the only cost effective proven power upgrade you can do on a naturally aspirated 996. Loss of torque lower down is something that stems from there being less 'back pressure' due to the freer flowing nature of the 200 cell cats. This is utter cobblers and 'back pressure' is not something deliberately designed into exhausts. Torque depends on efficient evacuation of the exhaust gasses from the cylinder. Partially blocking the pipe that they go down will harm rather than aid that process. If anybody tells you anything involving back pressure as a genuine 'thing' in exhaust design then kick them in the balls (hard) and walk away. The bore of the pipe has an effect, and at different revs, different bores of exhaust give the fastest gas flow, this is why different designs of exhaust give different torque characteristics. Smaller bore gives faster gas flow at lower RPM and therefore better torque low down. Bigger bore prevents the flow from becoming 'choked' at higher revs where there is more gas to evacuate.

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Cheers for the replies guys , your opions seem to agree with was I've read on the net , that it's one of the few mods that will make any difference . I just hope the old ones come off ok as the bolts will be rusted solid ! It has milltek back boxes at the moment , I reckon with the new cats the car will sound even better , if it sounds better it will feel faster , even if it's not 😂

POST 7Original post

If the bolts at the manifold ends are original then you'll almost certainly need to cut them and then drill or hammer out the studs from the manifold flange. Use stainless replacements from Ebay, or titanium bolts from Ebay if you're feeling flush.

POST 8Original post

On my car I have tried a few variations of exhaust and cat, I'm now on Carnewal modified cats and there exhaust modification. The car now sounds superb if not better than that. Personally I thought pse is how a Porsche should sound, the Carnewal is a step up and it keeps the proper Porsche sound

POST 9Original post

I too fancy a set of 200cel cats so good to hear comments on this mod, Drew1209- Would you mind letting me know the details on your system? PM me if you like don't want to go off topic on this thread too much, I have DANSK silencers that came with the car although they sound nice I miss my old PSE from the one I sold, It sounded like nothing else and I don't fancy paying out the price a new one is! so would be very interested in what you have for the same PSE sound??

POST 10Original post

I have what looks like 200 cell cats, definitely not standard, along with manifolds and ss boxes of unknown origin. My car dyno'd at 296hp and 254lbs ft I think. Few other bits but just the usual air filter in the standard box, sure fire coil packs and iridium plugs. Early 3.4 car with 74k and good history. I was very happy with the hp results as most I googled were 270-280. Torque was down on standard though. I have no before results, just the one session. Dyno results are obviously only a guide as the results will vary depending on where you go. I'm thinking of making my own exhaust with decats, x pipe and a centre exit. It's on the to do list but it's a big list. Would I feel the difference? Who knows. Any actual hp gains on a car like this are going to be brutally expensive. If ya want noise then go for it. Just don't be expecting a big boost in performance

POST 11Original post

I have what looks like 200 cell cats, definitely not standard, along with manifolds and ss boxes of unknown origin. My car dyno'd at 296hp and 254lbs ft I think. Few other bits but just the usual air filter in the standard box, sure fire coil packs and iridium plugs. Early 3.4 car with 74k and good history. I was very happy with the hp results as most I googled were 270-280. Torque was down on standard though. I have no before results, just the one session. Dyno results are obviously only a guide as the results will vary depending on where you go. I'm thinking of making my own exhaust with decats, x pipe and a centre exit. It's on the to do list but it's a big list. Would I feel the difference? Who knows. Any actual hp gains on a car like this are going to be brutally expensive. If ya want noise then go for it. Just don't be expecting a big boost in performance

POST 13Original post

I am also tempted by 200 cell cats. I wonder if one of the suppliers might be interested in giving a discount price if there is enough interest in a forum group buy? It looks like there are 3 interested so far, any more?

POST 14Original post

Could try Topgear for a group buy, good shout :wink:

POST 15Original post

I have Top Gear 200 cel cats and TG standard back boxes with OE manifolds and I really like the sound. The car feels much smoother and has a lovely bassy sound to the exhaust note. I am very pleased with it.The old cats were fckd and the innards were rattling around inside, so I needed to swap them out.Go for it. :thumbs: :thumbs:

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.