10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHMisha GT2 Style Rear Wing
Reported or suspected cause
only wing at the time
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
I have the Misha GT2 wing on my C4S 02 and it was the only wing at the time that fit the C4S.(not counting the little baby wings that abound).
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I am not looking for opinions on the look of this product (I can form those on my own), or opinions from those that have never driven a 996 with this installed (speculation will not help me).
Leading evidence: 'only wing at the time' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'only wing at the time' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Install (speculation will not help me)' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I am not looking for opinions on the look of this product (I can form those on my own), or opinions from those that have never driven a 996 with this installed (speculation will not help me).
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The high speed stability was scary and he replaced with Porsche OEM instead.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Install (speculation will not help me)
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I am not looking for opinions on the look of this product (I can form those on my own), or opinions from those that have never driven a 996 with this installed (speculation will not help me).
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T220748Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I would like to hear rennlister opinions on this product (from people that have actually put it on their cars).
First some information.
- My car is an '02 996 C2.
- I do not plan on taking this car to the track for a few years. My 986 will remain my track car until I turn the 996 into a PCA Club racer down the road. (then I will put the GT3 wing on).
- I am adding the GT3 front bumper at the same time (already have the sideskirts installed).
My questions are;
1) How is the quality of this product?
2) Have you noticed that this product adds stability or or detracts from stability at highway speed +++?
I am not looking for opinions on the look of this product (I can form those on my own), or opinions from those that have never driven a 996 with this installed (speculation will not help me).
Ray, ping Chris (C4S Surgeon) as I believe he had it and HATED it! The high speed stability was scary and he replaced with Porsche OEM instead.
Good for bling, bad for stability. Also, I would bet that GT2 wing it WAY TOO overpowering for a narrow body C2.
i think the stability would be fine a highway speeds but not on the track. chris didn't add the deeper turbo splitter or gt2 bumper so his front end got light at track speeds, no? at freeway speeds 65~90 it should be fine.
i somewhat agree with dell. although i think it looks ok on a narrowbody, it really belongs on a widebody. also i think it would look weird with a gt3 front bumper, JMHO.
quality wise i have been told it's real good.
i think your best bet is to deck your car out with the full gt3 mk2/aerokit 2. you already have the sideskirts and front bumper. just add the tail now... why wait when you go racing?
I had one on my 02 C4S and loved it. It was a bit more "darty" at high speed but once I put on my TA front spoiler all was well. I got one of the very first ones and the quality was good as well as the fit.
I had a misha on my white C2. Problem is it is a drop in unit to the factory decklid. The wing is held on by like 6 bolts. It fit crappy and at high freeway speeds it was a little sketchy. You would be better with the correct full 1 piece wing like an original GT2. Mashaw and Precision Porsche make them. Here is a pic of the cheap drop in Misha wing (cost the same as the full unit by the other 2 manufacturers) -
http://www.myvividracing.com/gallery...php?i=464&c=39
Here is the quality MaShaw Wing -
http://www.myvividracing.com/gallery...php?i=474&c=40
Here is the Precision Porsche Wing -
http://www.vividracing.com/catalog/w...es/drubes1.jpg
You can see the difference in height. The 1 piece wings fit with all factory fans, hardware, and etc. They are the same fit and finish as the real GT2. That is my 2cents from PERSONAL experience.
I have the wing on my car. Fit is very nice, i have no issue with it at all. No real stability issues that i can tell, and rumor has it, the car has been north of 125 for extended periods.... I have watched the wing in my mirror to look for any wierdness and havent seen any. I have the gt3 bumper and skirts as well.
I have the Misha GT2 wing on my C4S 02 and it was the only wing at the time that fit the C4S.(not counting the little baby wings that abound). It is rock solid and very well made. I chose to not add the extra light since the existing one is visible with the wing. I also have the NR auto GT2 front bumper made of urethane and have rock solid stability at 165+. Will
The key is the matching front the decrease the airflow under the car thus reducing lift. But if you add that monster wing to the rear and increase the downforce in the rear without reducing the lift in the fron you are asking for a scary ride at higher speeds.
The PAG engineers spent alot of time and $$$ on the design of the factory aerokits and there is a reason they will ALWAYS outperform and have the better stability than all the copies and knockoffs. Just something to think about when shopping.
I think the quality of this product is great... at highway speeds I don't notice any difference and that's from 90~120. It's different cause its a gt2 style wing on a gt3 style base, I like the look.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
