911uk

996 MOT failure rate = 1.9% :o) Good selling point

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH996 MOT failure rate = 1.9% :o) Good selling point

Leading reported evidence

Replace dirrection of the car

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
There is one on my daily commute on a bend that I have some try and avoid without hitting the kerb, I have hit it a few times , get a loud bang and it actually changes the dirrection of the car!
Original post Read captured discussion
996 MOT failure rate = 1.9% :o) Good selling point

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace dirrection of the car' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace dirrection of the car' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace dirrection of the car

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
There is one on my daily commute on a bend that I have some try and avoid without hitting the kerb, I have hit it a few times , get a loud bang and it actually changes the dirrection of the car!
Original post Read captured discussion
996 MOT failure rate = 1.9% :o) Good selling point

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T005001Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Print this page and keep in your files, may come as an extra selling point when if / you decide to sell. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8461394.stm

POST 2Original post

would have been a much higher 996 failure rate but so many broke down or engines blew up on the way to the MOT station that it skewed the figures... :schater: :schater: :schater: only joking kettle boys!

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Pee off back to your own side of the forum!

POST 4Original post

i've already pissed everyone off there too! uh: but seriously: that's a superb result; the ocd of the porsche owner shining through- amazing when you compare it to the other end of the spectrum, more than 1/4 of renault megane's failing the mot

POST 5Original post

Closer to 18% in the UK: http://911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=50676 I extracted the VOSA Porsche figures for the PCGB forum, and you can download an Excel spreadsheet here: http://www.porscheclubgb.org/clientftp/Register/996/MOT_Porsche_Comp_2007.xls

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hmm.. an increase of 16+% I have one thing to say about that..... 'P O T - H O L E S' Don't what it is like by you but there are some huge ones around after the last freeze, our tarmac is sh.... There is one on my daily commute on a bend that I have some try and avoid without hitting the kerb, I have hit it a few times , get a loud bang and it actually changes the dirrection of the car! I pay tax for that :x

POST 7Original post

You could be right, Lloyd Six. 36.4% of failures were due to tyres. My local pothole did this to my VR6 the other week :evil:

POST 8Original post

I hope you have taken it up with the council Nick. Take a picture of the pothole and make a claim with them. They DO pay out! And Lloyd - the roads around here are as cr4p as there - as Nick has proven! The answer is to move to Walse - all the EU money went there, and the roads are fantastic.

POST 9Original post

I really do hope so Richard - they seem to imply in the claims bumf that if you're the first victim then they don't If they do pay, it's going to be for 4 new BBS split-rims because the ones I have are obsolete. Around £2K I reckon :thumb:

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.