10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHMk1 diagnostic tool questions
Leading reported evidence
Use parallels and vmware fusion
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use parallels and vmware fusion' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check of all the cluster functions' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
For the '80s cars with no OBD, I use these diagnostic tools.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Here, I'm running a check of all the cluster functions.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Parallels is worth its weight in gold if you use both mac and windows regularly.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I know there is a wealth of information here on this forum and yes I could use the search button but this is definitely one thing that can change in time.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I know there is a wealth of information here on this forum and yes I could use the search button but this is definitely one thing that can change in time.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 1 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T173940Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I know there is a wealth of information here on this forum and yes I could use the search button but this is definitely one thing that can change in time. I am looking to buy an economical diagnostic to that will read codes, clear codes etc without spending a fortune. I have been looking into them myself but don�t want to pull the trigger and end up with junk.
Im sure a few of us could use some up to date info on what�s the one to buy currently.
Thanks in advance
I got a simple OBDII reader at AutoZone for $50. I leave it in my door pocket and can read/erase codes on the fly. That way, if I'm traveling and something pops up, I can read the code and understand what is happening. It works on my wife's Mini and on my son's Ford truck as well.
I also have the Durametric software and cable for more serious stuff, codes, ignitions, cam deviations, system error codes and so on. Well worth the investment.
Durametric... $300 is not a "fortune". If you were to take your car to the dealer for diagnostics it'll cost you close to that for one shot - and you walk away with nothing.
I've also got a generic OBDII code reader. It'll get you fault codes but they're generic codes that you have to translate to Porsche specific codes. Most of them work fine - ie: they translate properly. There are a few that don't however. Either Durametric or one of the more expensive Porsche specific readers (which will cost almost as much or more) are highly recommended.
Durametric only runs on Windows so if you have a Macbook you'll need some sort of VM software like Parallels or VMware. You'll spend an additional $50-$100 for either of these 2 products. If you have a Linux based laptop you'll be out over $200 for VMware for Workstation. The point being there is added cost if you don't run Windows.
Not to nerd this out too much, but you can install windows on a mac without a VM, you can install it in bootcamp. I use parallels and vmware fusion. Parallels is worth its weight in gold if you use both mac and windows regularly.
I found a brand new (unused) Durametric for $200.00 I think it was on ebay but I could be mistaken. Guy bought it and then realized he needed a full rebuild before using it. Good deals can be found if you take your time and search.
I have the Durametric Enthusiast and Foxwell NT510 for the Porsches
It's a bummer there's nothing for Porsche cars like the software for BMWs. It does waaay more than Durametric Pro and it's FREE. It even lets you program new keys without going to the dealer.
Here, I'm running a check of all the cluster functions.
For the '80s cars with no OBD, I use these diagnostic tools.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
