Planet-9

911 history - should I be concerned?

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

8 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH911 history - should I be concerned?

Leading reported evidence

Check come up

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
And, does the computer module check come up on Carfax if one has a regular service?
Original post Read captured discussion
911 history - should I be concerned?

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Check come up' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check come up' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 8 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

Check twice, at 10k miles and again at 20k miles

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
I wonder if there is a front-end issue as that was checked twice, at 10K miles and again at 20K miles...
Original post Read captured discussion
911 history - should I be concerned?

Use tapatalk 2

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Original post Read captured discussion
911 history - should I be concerned?

Frequently discussed actions (3)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check come up

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
And, does the computer module check come up on Carfax if one has a regular service?
Original post Read captured discussion
911 history - should I be concerned?

Check twice, at 10k miles and again at 20k miles

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
I wonder if there is a front-end issue as that was checked twice, at 10K miles and again at 20K miles...
Original post Read captured discussion
911 history - should I be concerned?

Use tapatalk 2

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Original post Read captured discussion
911 history - should I be concerned?

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T044418Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

I'm looking at this certified 911 ( 997.1 , 30k miles). Should I be concerned about it having four owners? CARFAX Vehicle History Report for this 2006 PORSCHE 911 CARRERA S Thanks for any input.

POST 2Original post

One person owned it for 15 days? I wonder if there is a front-end issue as that was checked twice, at 10K miles and again at 20K miles... And, does the computer module check come up on Carfax if one has a regular service? (I'm asking, I have no idea ...)

POST 3Original post

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...doesn't feel good. - RB.

POST 4Original post

Yeah, I had a funny feeling about it myself. Thanks for the feedback folks. Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

POST 5Original post

I dont think there is owner #3. To me it looks like car has been traded in while still being financed and Porsche of Englewood (or whatever name they go under) bought it out from financing company. So technically they had it in their possession from 8/27/10 through 1/11/11 As for the records in question - call the dealership who did the service and ask if they have any notes about the car. Tell them you are purchasing the car and wonder why they had to perform the checks...

POST 6Original post

4 people made the decision to sell it , question is why ? Cheers.

POST 7Original post

So they could buy a Cayman instead of course! :hilarious:

POST 8Original post

To many electrical issues. I would stay clear.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.