3 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHYet another IMS bearing question
Leading reported evidence
Use previously
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
1) My vehicle has the improved larger bearing that (anecdotally at least) has a lower failure rate than the bearing used previously
Leading evidence: 'Use previously' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use previously' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Pelican Parts: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T181445Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
New poster to the board with an IMS bearing question. I recently acquired a 2006 C2S with 80K miles, previous owner of a 78 SC. I have an extended warranty on the C2S; so much of this is really just understanding my options down the road. My specific question is can you remove the seal from the factory bearing without splitting the case? Has anyone done this?
Here’s what I think I know, any corrections would be appreciated:
1) My vehicle has the improved larger bearing that (anecdotally at least) has a lower failure rate than the bearing used previously
2) Removing the flange allows access and visual inspection, but the bearing can’t be pulled without splitting the case as the bearing outer diameter is larger than the opening
3) The general theory is that motor oil breaches the bearing seal thus washing out the “permanent” grease packed in the bearing. This appears to be confirmed by numerous reports of intact removed bearings draining oil.
4) However, the continuing presence of the seal (despite being breached) doesn’t allow free-flow of motor oil thus providing inadequate lubrication. Premature failure results.
5) The bearing has seals on both sides. The seal toward the flywheel allows the oil access as the IMS is closed on the other end and oil can’t get in. The IMS retrofit bearings leave this end open (no seal) to allow free motor oil access.
6) Although the bearing won’t fit through the opening, the full OD of the seal can be see with flange removed (see M97 photo from LN Engineering that hopefully appeared below)
So when in there for a clutch job, is it possible to pull out the bearing seal? From the photo it looks not only possible, but perhaps relatively easy. How difficult is it to dislodge the seal from the factory bearing? Some sort of thin, barbed tool could be used to puncture the seal and provide enough resistance to allow extraction. Presumably, this could be done gently without damaging the ball bearings. Has anyone done this or heard of it being done on an M97?
Thanks for any responses.
