14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHRennkit eram 996T
Leading reported evidence
Replace with another oem (as you have
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Replace with another oem (as you have' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace with another oem (as you have' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T105141Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi from a lurker on here since last year
I bought a 2003 996T with a faulty known rear wing failure and would like to go the eram route. Has anyone here had this upgrade?
Rennkit's website only shows 3 UK distributors and the one closest to me no longer offers this service (RPM Technik, Long Marston). That leaves LGC Porsche (because Cardiff's even further away from me (for Chris Denning))
Does anyone else do this?
Thx
Looks like its pretty straightforward to install - have you considered getting it direct and going the DIY route instead? Or getting your current garage/indy to install it?
Edit: Looks like the chaps over in Netherlands can supply it too:
https://www.custom-concepts.nl/en/c...t_id/884/virtuemart_category_id/52/lang/en-GB
~£1700 at time of purchase (purchase price in Euro) is a tad more expensive than Porsche's OEM notorious hydraulic system
N.B. I went for the 3" kit - 1" more than OEM which cost a little more
There are a few posts on this forum about the Rennkit - have a quick search
The OEM hydraulic ram is prone to fail due to a design flaw
The alternatives are to:
1. replace with another OEM (as you have... twice!)
2. upgrade to something like this:
http://www.revolution-porsche.co.uk/upgrades/porsche-996-and-997-turbo-spoiler-repairs-and-upgrades
Or
3. go the e-ram route - no hydraulic parts to fail - reduced weight due to removal of redundant components and choice of spoiler height
No probs
I would have gone down this route too but it meant taking the car up to Leeds are and leaving it with them - too far for me to do 2 round trips and I quite like the non-hydraulic idea and having the extra spoiler height option
