fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

Warning 996C4S SH52DMZ from Stratton Motor Co

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHWarning 996C4S SH52DMZ from Stratton Motor Co

Leading reported evidence

Use pics

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

They appear to have used the old pics from a few months ago too - the one of the speedo shows 59,244 miles, but the advert states last serviced at 59,600 miles so hopefully any eagle-eyed viewers may pick up on that and ask about it.

Warning 996C4S SH52DMZ from Stratton Motor Co
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use pics' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use pics' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 15 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use pics

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

They appear to have used the old pics from a few months ago too - the one of the speedo shows 59,244 miles, but the advert states last serviced at 59,600 miles so hopefully any eagle-eyed viewers may pick up on that and ask about it.

Warning 996C4S SH52DMZ from Stratton Motor Co
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T203514Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Warning 996C4S SH52DMZ from Stratton Motor Co Has an Identified Engine Fault Buyer Beware, read http://911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=126344 https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201802133685673 :x :x Now arrived?! Recently Serviced by Porsche?! Should read been with us since November whilst we were treating the current owner unfairly. Serviced at Porsche by the previous owner which we are now benefitting. Rotten blowing sports exhaust. New brakes as we sold it in Sept with knackered ones. Sold as seen. 1 lady owner. :bandit: Image update from below

POST 2Original post

That is appalling. Book to see it under a false name on a Saturday morning when they are really busy, and then noisily raise hell in front of their customers... :viking:

POST 3Original post

You forgot about ........ 6 months warranty not worth the paper it's written on. A shocking tale :nooo:

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

All I hope is that whoever is interested in a C4S finds this thread before that car or that they do their own homework. It wouldn't be very nice for the new owner of that car coming on here chuffed with their recent purchase to read of the issues.

POST 5Original post

You can write a review of them on Autotrader and be sure to specifically mention this car - this link should take you there: https://www.autotrader.co.uk/servic...tor-company-norwich-dpp-10005432/sort/default They appear to have used the old pics from a few months ago too - the one of the speedo shows 59,244 miles, but the advert states last serviced at 59,600 miles so hopefully any eagle-eyed viewers may pick up on that and ask about it. Did the car get registered to you? Often people can be put off when they see a very short period of ownership so hopefully it will be a difficult sale for them.

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Yep good spot...the pics are from the original ad when I bought it. It fully registered in my name and was collected by them at the end of Nov last year with 59,845 miles. Surely it should ring alarm bells that it was sold 6 months ago by the same dealer with such little mileage covered....I wonder what they would say if asked??? :?:

POST 7Original post

It won't as they will say that they sold the car to you and, because you had such great :roll: customer service, that you upgraded it and traded it back in to them :bandit: c:

POST 8 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Perhaps it would be worth an enquiry?? :?:

POST 9Original post

How about we ALL write a review on Stratton...?? Be a giggle hundreds of us writing a sh!t review and mentioning the same car.... :bandit: Osh

POST 10Original post

Osh that's along the lines of what I was going to suggest to Phil last week if we all emailed the garage to say what a poor experience BChivs had been going through and they should make good any financial shortfall he has suffered through this unhappy episode and this would be the great PR exercise for the dealer .The same could be said to the PPI garage I would most happy to start the ball rolling :thumb: MZ

POST 11Original post

How ironic is it that I am over that way in the morning so I will make sure I get to see it and see what they say to me posing as an interested customer. Do I have permission to ask if this is the car the previous customer had such a lot of trouble with? I really don't mind making a fuss :bandit:

POST 12 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I'd be more interested to see what story they tell how it's back for sale! I have no problem with you mentioning the trouble I have had though.

POST 13Original post

worth updating, 996C4S SH52DMZ from Stratton Motor Co Autotrader advert is no longer online Which means some unsuspecting buyer may have bought this :nooo:

POST 14 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Yep all ads no longer live....removed from their own website too! Feel sorry for the buyer.😔

POST 15Original post

Maybe removed as they have spotted it on here? perhaps removed to take away some of the heat? be interested to see if its actually still in the showroom :?:

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.