11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHMobile speed camera detector - what's the best?
Leading reported evidence
Install sensors
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I have the Laser Pro Park which is a parking sensor for the front of the car which compliments the rear factory fitted sensors on the rear.
Leading evidence: 'Install sensors' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust speed' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
That's true, but if you don't have an electric garage door that opens when using your "jammer" you'll get into proper trouble.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
ive sold my road angel now, and im using the camera updates on my pioneer satnav (one less cable in the car)
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Living in North Wales were blessed with some fantastic driving roads but unfortunatly even though the Ayatollah of speed (Richard Brunstrome) has now retired were still plagued with an abundance of mobile speed cameras!
I'm looking to buy a laser speed camera detector and would be interested in any suggestions from fellow P drivers as well as finding out what you're currently using.
I'm not interested in fixed speed cameras detectors as we don't have many of these it's purly for the van mounted laser cameras.
There's loads of threads on this and these are few on the first page of the search...
uh:
http://911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=50637
http://911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=48485
http://911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=49817
http://911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=49233
http://911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=47449
http://911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=47240
Inforad k1, £40 from Halfords, lifetime updates, very discreet. For the money cant fault it. Picks them all up and is the size of a USB stick. You have to learn the beeps and what they mean, but very effective. :thumb:
if i understand what your saying right, the normal systems that work off GPS would be no good, you need a system that will pick up when your being targeted by a camera van?
good news and bad news then.
Somthing like a road angel with the additional sensors which are located front and rear close to your number plates is probably best bet, since your looking for real time signals not just a location on a map (since the vans move all the time) and thats where the gun is likely to be pointed to target your car.
bad news is, probably wont do you any help at all, by the time the unit has gone off and alerted you, youve been nicked, read somewhere that it takes somthing like 0.4 seconds to target, calculate and receive and find your driver details!
ive sold my road angel now, and im using the camera updates on my pioneer satnav (one less cable in the car)
sorry couldnt be more help, but dont belive all the hype and save your money
Jon
Apparently you can get away with having a jammer because a lot of them have a dual purposes such as electric garage door opener or parking sensor. . . "terribly sorry it interfered with your laser officer" LOL
I have a Snooper S5r which is a laser detector, however in the 5 years ive had it all it has only been needed once, i think the best option is to drive sensibly if you get me, - there is a time and a place.
That's true, but if you don't have an electric garage door that opens when using your "jammer" you'll get into proper trouble.
That's the reason I went for the parking sensor alternative as who's to say that's not what it was intended for? I have the Laser Pro Park which is a parking sensor for the front of the car which compliments the rear factory fitted sensors on the rear.
Telegraph: "A businessman with nine points on his driving licence has been convicted of perverting the course of justice after a jury found he used the device - known as the Target LT (Laser Track) 400 - to block detector guns and avoid a further speeding conviction."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/...age-door-gadget-blinds-police-speed-guns.html
