11 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHHas anyone “remapped” their 981 2.7 Boxster? - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Run on a dyno
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Has anyone “remapped” their 981 2.7 Boxster? - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Run on a dyno' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run on a dyno' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Has anyone “remapped” their 981 2.7 Boxster? - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T065735Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I just wondered if anyone had remapped their 981 non S? There seem to be quite a few different options available ranging in price from £150-£500 mostly offering around a 20/30 bhp increase and a similar increase in torque.
T5GRF said:
I just wondered if anyone had remapped their 981 non S? There seem to be quite a few different options available ranging in price from £150-£500 mostly offering around a 20/30 bhp increase and a similar increase in torque.
Mines going in at 5pm today at Phantom in Bedfordshire to have a 981 2.7 remapped, will let you know how it goes…
Noir exactly relevant but I had my 2003 986s remapped by Mapro in Portsmouth. They recovered about 15 bhp lost over the years but the significant increase was in low down torque. It’s dramatically improved the drivability of the car as it peaks around 1000rpm earlier.
Edited by Smollet on Sunday 12th February 10:19
gordon1955 said:
Remap all done, Great company and a nice price of £274….
Sorry to appear sceptical but I struggle to believe those results.
Did they run on a dyno before and after?
I doubt it (at least not for £274).
Looks like they just filled in a certificate which is worthless.
I hope it drives better though - that’s all that really matters.
Edited by anonymous-user on Monday 13th February 21:32
Interesting, Phantom tuning in Bedford seem to be claiming +31hp for my 987.2 Boxster S which seems very ambitious for what appears to be a generic map. Anyone else have any experience of this company ?
It's a good idea to time some in-gear acceleration ... say 4th gear 20 mph increments on the flat, and compare before and after. Can estimate torque and power increase from this, and takes away any doubt of real-life gains.
Discombobulate said:
Sorry to appear sceptical but I struggle to believe those results.
Did they run on a dyno before and after?
I doubt it (at least not for £274).
Looks like they just filled in a certificate which is worthless.
I hope it drives better though - that’s all that really matters.
Edited by Discombobulate on Monday 13th February 21:32
It does 0-60 now in 3.5 seconds, nearly as fast as my 2017 GT3 RS
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
