7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCamber adjustment
Leading reported evidence
Run hoosiers
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Run hoosiers' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run hoosiers' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I'm getting it done at the dealer so they are also gonna set the toein, etc!
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T120458Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm planning to have my camber adjusted so I won't wear my track tires quite as much AND enhance my grip. On an O2C2 with US 030 suspension I was told the most I can get out of the front is about -1. What would be the corresponding amount for the rear end??
Anybody know??
I'm getting it done at the dealer so they are also gonna set the toein, etc!
Someone please respond!! I need this info to as my track tires look like the outer 1/4 is all that is wearing on the front (d@mn understeer). Rears appear to be wearing evenly.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Stem:
[QB]I'm planning to have my camber adjusted so I won't wear my track tires quite as much AND enhance my grip. On an O2C2 with US 030 suspension I was told the most I can get out of the front is about -1. What would be the corresponding amount for the rear end??
Anybody know??
The rears on my RoW M030 setup were aligned by ANDIAL to neg. 1.5 degrees. The fronts were set at zero, but after a week, I had it readjusted to neg. 1 degrees. The car's handling balance is much improved with this alignment, however there are further gains in adjustability when going the coilover route (for those contemplating RoW M030 vs. coilover).
-1 degrees front is too much as I was told that over -.7 wears the crap out of the tires although gets rid of a lot of understeer. I run -.5f -1.4r as much as I could get out of rear with stock suspension.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by SPR:
<strong>-1 degrees front is too much as I was told that over -.7 wears the crap out of the tires although gets rid of a lot of understeer.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Sean,
You are right and it would be too much for the average "street" driver. However, if you drive fairly aggressively, your tires should wear quite evenly with negative one degree. The problem is that one may not be able to get that much negative camber with the stock suspension. In fact, I am surprised you could get -0.5 degrees with yours.
I am running Hoosiers on the track. I thought I had too much neg camber in mine judging by the fact that my street tires were bald on the inside 1/4 and a very fair amount of tread left on the outer 1/2. I probably need and alignment and will probably fo with as much neg as I can get. Are the 996's as difficult to align as the 993's? Should I take it to a specialty shop or will the dealer suffice?
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
