15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHLightweight flywheel (RPM Technik - CSR)
Leading reported evidence
Install along
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I have a 996 turbo and have fitted along with a custom clutch,,,,,all good !
Leading evidence: 'Install along' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install along' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
In fact it is even easier with a lightweight flywheel as there is less requirement to heel and toe since the engine spins up so much more easily when changing gear.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
In fact it is even easier with a lightweight flywheel as there is less requirement to heel and toe since the engine spins up so much more easily when changing gear.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T161109Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi everyone,
I'm looking at a car that has a lightweight flywheel fitted. It's from RPM Technik and the one they use in their CSR builds.
I've done some basic research about the mechanical side of things and have read that it can cause increased stress on the crankcase. So I'm not sure if it's a good idea if you're not doing a comprehensive engine/gearbox lightening programme.
But here's my question to those who have one/have driven one: does it feel any different?
Is the clutch more sensitive? Is it 'daily driveable' (city traffic, etc.)?
The owner says it makes more noise, but that's all he had to say about it really.
The car is a far way's away from me. So I was hoping to get an impression from the good people on here before I drive it myself.
Yes it will feel different. Immediately noticeable. The engine revs will rise and fall much more quickly and you will have up to 20% more power at the wheels in first gear.
MC
That in itself doesn't sound too bad at all.
But I would imagine some driveability will be sacrificed as a result, right?
If the revs fall quickly that would theoretically mean you'd have to give it more revs when driving in first in stop start traffic.
I run one on my turbo with an upgraded clutch. It takes a bit of getting used to at first but not really a big deal. There is more of a chance of stalling the engine if you are a bit ham-fisted with the clutch. But no downsides as far as I'm concerned. I will be fitting one to the engine for my C4 project.
MC
Doesn't sound that bad then.
There are a bunch of naff videos on youtube where people try to show the difference, but they're not very helpful.
The clutch is standard in the car I'm looking at.
I'm not a 'driving God' who heels and toes everywhere and the standard cars I've driven up until now were just fine for driveability.
So I'm only worried it might be a pain.
You don't need to be a driving God. In fact it is even easier with a lightweight flywheel as there is less requirement to heel and toe since the engine spins up so much more easily when changing gear.
MC
I've got a lightweight flywheel in my early 996, yes it's a bit noisier but it's not hugely intrusive.
The more immediate throttle response more than compensates for it and I find it easier to modulate the clutch too.
Go for it :thumbs:
I drove an RPM CSR last year when hunting for my first 911. It had the LW fly wheel and was absolutely fine both as a daily and in anger. A touch more revs needed pulling away from standstill needed. Gave the impression of a more motorsport engine.
Ive got the RPM LWFW on mine with their sprung clutch
loved it as a modification that much that even after a freak incident of a stuck starter motor damaged the teeth on mine
i went and purchased another
i live in Notts if thats closer to you your welcome to have a listen and passenger ride in mine :thumb:
Thanks for the opinions and the offer of a listen
I'll check out the car in question myself in the next few days and report back.
From what I can tell it makes a fair bit of sense on turbos, as the engine doesn't rev as freely as its naturally aspirated cousin.
Best thing about it all though is that it can be replaced for a dual mass if I don't like it, as the car ticks a lot of other boxes for me.