15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHOpinion on this 996
Leading reported evidence
Replace car has had 5 owners, i dont think anything
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Car has had 5 owners, i dont think anything has been changed on the car - but im budgetting £1500 to do the clutch, IMS and low temp thermostat.
Leading evidence: 'Replace car has had 5 owners, i dont think anything' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check advisories.......and don't part' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The good news is it seems to have been lightly used through it's life.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'd at least get him to MOT it and then check the advisories.......and don't part with dosh until the bores are checked and ok.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If the car would fail it, or get advisories, I'd prefer that it not be sent for the test until fixed.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T025149Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Folks,
Wonder if any of you have any thoughts on this:
https://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C916003
Car looks clean, mileage looks decent and apparently full porsche history bar last service (which was at a good indy).
Looking for a C2, and wondering if this could be the one!
From the brief description it sounds ok
The pictures are terrible and the description not much better.
I would want to know. How many owners? What work has been done other than standard servicing? Clutch, RMS? What does the MOT history look like? Mileage PA? Low yearly use or stored for periods?
If it sounds ok go and have a look. If it looks ok then PPI inspection to include the bores.
Having had a look at the MOT history there have been a few advisories re brakes, dampers, tyres etc.
The good news is it seems to have been lightly used through it's life.
I would be wanting to see the bills for all work done then factor in the usual stuff not there. Radiators, suspension components etc
MOT is due end May, not July...
Its the right sort of money, nice mileage
Looks good, and unappealing ads can hide a gem, so worth doing some homework I'd say.
So in answer to some questions:
Car has had 5 owners, i dont think anything has been changed on the car - but im budgetting £1500 to do the clutch, IMS and low temp thermostat.
Its had brake discs and pads done by the OPC in 2014 - and done minimal mileage since.
Seller said he would MOT and service it prior to sale. I'm tempted to say to him knock £250 any agreed price and i do the servicing.
If the engine is coming out to do that then I would add AOS, Water pump, RMS. Ping the seal off the IMS bearing. Check the rear rigid brake hose above the engine
Don't get hung up on the mileage - that could well be just round the corner from needing an engine rebuild (mine was Hartech'd at 60k miles).
I'd sooner find a high mileage car that's had the big ticket items done, particularly at that price.
I'd be very wary of buying a 15 yr old car that's only covered 1k miles in the last 3 years, has no MOT (as yet) and needs servicing. I'd at least get him to MOT it and then check the advisories.......and don't part with dosh until the bores are checked and ok.
Thats not a bad call - do all those service items in one go and know (to a point!) that the car is safe.
Re the MOT - exactly my thinking. Id get it MOT'd somewhere, and then negotiate a deal based on what the advisories are.
Essex Porsche Inspections are going there tomorrow to give the car a once over , sadly it was too far for Porsche Inspections to go and view.
Car (if bought) will prob be taken to Northway for them to do any work as always found them to be brilliant in the past.
I'd use the PPI as both a negotiating tool and the list of stuff to do before the MOT - no point running it through the MOT until you've done the stuff.
I'd be wary of using an MOT as a way of generating a task list - the PPI is much better for that.
MOT runs out in 4 weeks. Nobody suggested using that as a checklist, more a case of not parting with any dosh on a car with no MOT (that includes a deposit).
If the car would fail it, or get advisories, I'd prefer that it not be sent for the test until fixed. If that means the MOT happens after I've taken delivery then that's by-the-by.
Not sure where the misnomer has come from - the car does have an MOT until 30th May. Just that the seller said he would put it through its MOT before selling it so it came with a full 12 months MOT.