24 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHanyone lowered C4S suspension
Leading reported evidence
Install b&m short shifter
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Fadz, I'm not sure I understood your question about posting a picture of the installed B&M short shifter.
Leading evidence: 'Install b&m short shifter' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install b&m short shifter' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
At that price point I think its just about perfect for mostly street occasional track use (I track it maybe 3-4x times a year).
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
My C4 was lowered 30mm by previous owner using Tech Art kit.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
24 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T064914Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hey Fadz...I just remembered something I heard at a PCA meet yesterday.
If I'm correct there is an X74 suspension option for C2's. A guy I know just had it done and we were discussing it. A third guy said there will be a similar package available for the C4S soon called X73. Might be an option?
This X74 as I was told was 20mm lower than ROW 30 and quite a bit stiffer.
* I believe I have all my code numbers etc. correct but I'm not 100% sure.
Anybody clarify/correct me on this information?
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by LanceK:
<strong>
* I believe I have all my code numbers etc. correct but I'm not 100% sure.
Anybody clarify/correct me on this information?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Here you go: <a href="http://64.35.111.106/cpx_p96088.htm" target="_blank">X73 for C4S</a> .
Here's an old post on this forum discussing this: <a href="http://forums.rennlist.com/forums/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=5;t=003059#000003" target="_blank">Lowering the C4S</a> .
If anyone has it on, a pic would be interesting.
My C4 was lowered 30mm by previous owner using Tech Art kit. Looks great - don't think it is especially hard. (Have driven it back to back with standard C2.)
Fadz,
Tuesday I'm having my Euro M030 C4S suspension installed, along with a B&M short shifter. I'll be sure to post before and after pictures. It's my understanding that this suspension will lower the car 20mm in the front and 10mm in the rear.
Has anyone else had this suspension installed?
Well FADZ your car is a ROW model so it already comes lower then US spec cars. If you want to go lower still, you could either go for PSS9, H&R coilovers or the X-73. I never tried the X73 nor so I know of anyone who installed it but I had rides in H&R and RUF's version of the PSS9 and both were great. Make sure u order swaybars for either as the handling will need adjusting. The car with H&R understeered alot and this wasn't corrected until H&R swaybars were instaled.
If one was to go with PSS9 on a C4-S is there a "specific" version needed?
From what is posted here it seems like the C4-S has it's own unique suspension. Not as high or soft as a C2 but not as low and stiff as a Turbo. Does this sound accurate?
If this is the case it should be broadcast to C4-S owners as up to this point I at least was completely confused on the subject of C4-S suspension.
TIA
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by LanceK:
<strong>If one was to go with PSS9 on a C4-S is there a "specific" version needed?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">There is a PSS-9 kit especially for the C4 and the C4S.
The X73 for the TT and C4S is not available yet.
They first said it would be released in Jan'03, then it was delayed to May'03.
So far, no sign of the X73...
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by LanceK:
[QB]This X74 as I was told was 20mm lower than ROW 30 and quite a bit stiffer.
QB]</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">The X74 will lower a US car 40mm in the front and 30mm in the rear.
It's a bit firmer than the Euro M030 setup and comparable to the firmness of a H&R coilover kit.
My C4S is lowered with the RoW springs and shocks (purchased from Gert, there's nobody better for this stuff). It cleaned up the fender gaps nicely and got rid of the ridiculous "nose in the air" look it had stock. Its also still high enough that i dont tear up my chin spoiler too badly on driveways. At that price point I think its just about perfect for mostly street occasional track use (I track it maybe 3-4x times a year). One extra benefit is it allowed me to get one full degree neg. camber up front which really reduced low speed understeer and sharpened turn in. You will have some increased front tire wear but i think its a worthwhile tradeoff...
BTW i also have the Techart short shift and love it, car should come stock like that...
I'll try to post some pics later...
Chris
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by Redlinerobert:
<strong>Fadz,
Tuesday I'm having my Euro M030 C4S suspension installed, along with a B&M short shifter. I'll be sure to post before and after pictures. It's my understanding that this suspension will lower the car 20mm in the front and 10mm in the rear.
Has anyone else had this suspension installed?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Great! then lets wait for the pictures of the beauty lowered, btw how does the short shifter look, i mean outlook picture please when installed? <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/beerchug.gif" />
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by 03-turbo911:
<strong>Well FADZ your car is a ROW model so it already comes lower then US spec cars.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">I will measure the gap over the front and the rear tyres and will post them, but need to know the size of the gap for the US spec C4S, anyone interested to do so? general comparison!
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by Redlinerobert:
<strong>CjN,
Your link is not working properly.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">It works now, server must have gone down last night...
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by Fadz:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by 03-turbo911:
<strong>Well FADZ your car is a ROW model so it already comes lower then US spec cars.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">I will measure the gap over the front and the rear tyres and will post them, but need to know the size of the gap for the US spec C4S, anyone interested to do so? general comparison!</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">I have comparison pics with a UK C4S and mine. I'll also measure the gap when I get home. I'll post them all. Visually, I can't tell the diff.
Part of the problem is that the specs are +/- 10mm for manufacturing variation. So, an ROW car can have +10, and a US car can have -10, and the US car in theory will be the same or lower.
OK. Here we go.
Front is about 1 1/2", or 38 mm
<img src="http://members.rennlist.com/palting/Porsche%20028s.JPG" alt=" - " />
Rear is 1 5/8", or 41 mm.
<img src="http://members.rennlist.com/palting/Porsche%20031s.JPG" alt=" - " />
Front ground clearance is 5" or 127mm
<img src="http://members.rennlist.com/palting/Porsche%20030s.JPG" alt=" - " />
You all judge. 8mm front, 1 mm rear diff.I vote for PSS9. Too bad X73 is not yet available.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by Palting:
<strong>
Part of the problem is that the specs are +/- 10mm for manufacturing variation. So, an ROW car can have +10, and a US car can have -10, and the US car in theory will be the same or lower.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">I think I must have one of the +10mm ones then, because my car looks way too high in the front...
<img src="http://boards.rennlist.com/upload/IMG_0594.jpeg" alt=" - " />
Guys,
I will post pictures tomorrow of before and after the install. If I understand correctly, the car will also "settle" a bit after a few days so it may go down even more. Whether or not the difference is perceptable I have no idea.
Fadz, I'm not sure I understood your question about posting a picture of the installed B&M short shifter. There should be no difference in the outward appearance. Let me know if you meant something different.
I feel like I'm getting a new car all over again!
Yes Robert, i meant the outward appearance,i thought there might be some difference in the outward look too. waiting your evo pictures, please mention the gap space in mm before and after if you have some time, thanks
Unfortunately I did not measure the gap this morning before I dropped the car off at the dealership. It won't be ready til tomorrow so I'll post pics asap.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.