fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

Stupid Naming Conventions

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
16 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHStupid Naming Conventions

Leading reported evidence

Use by porsche

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

The series letter (A, B, C, etc.) is used by Porsche to indicate the revision for production cars.

Stupid Naming Conventions
Frequently discussed work

Replace annually

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

It often changes annually to reflect changes for the new

Stupid Naming Conventions
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use by porsche' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace annually' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 16 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 4 other evidence results

Replace annually

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

It often changes annually to reflect changes for the new

Stupid Naming Conventions

Replace headings

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Although Porsche internally changes the headings for its models, all 911 models were and are currently sold as a "911".

Stupid Naming Conventions

Replace make even less sense

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

's changes make even less sense.

Stupid Naming Conventions

Replace new

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

It often changes annually to reflect changes for the new

Stupid Naming Conventions
Frequently discussed actions (8)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace annually

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

It often changes annually to reflect changes for the new

Stupid Naming Conventions

Replace headings

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Although Porsche internally changes the headings for its models, all 911 models were and are currently sold as a "911".

Stupid Naming Conventions

Replace make even less sense

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

's changes make even less sense.

Stupid Naming Conventions

Replace new

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

It often changes annually to reflect changes for the new

Stupid Naming Conventions

Use by porsche

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

The series letter (A, B, C, etc.) is used by Porsche to indicate the revision for production cars.

Stupid Naming Conventions

Use porsche's internal classifications

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

The headings below use Porsche's internal classifications:

Stupid Naming Conventions

Use within the parts program

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

They are used within the parts program to identify the models, but also your VIN contains this same model number, and so you could say it's in the public domain as well.

Stupid Naming Conventions

Use zero in their naming schemes (even back

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

But Peugeot have the monopoly on using a zero in their naming schemes (even back then) so they had to change it to

Stupid Naming Conventions
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T044418Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

Hello everyone. I think I need to vent here about the way Porsche identifies their generational changes in each of their car models. Let's start up top: the 911 . The first one was a 911 of course. All good. Then the 930, then jumped to the 964, then the 993. Then they realized they were running out of runway so they went to the 996, then the 997. Then some genius German decided to step back to the 991. If they take the safe route and go to the 992 next , they've now painted themselves into a corner. What's after that? Why did they ever decide to name the 911 another 9XX moniker in the first place? And don't get me started on the Boxster and Cayman ...

POST 2Original post

They're just internal model designations. No real need to follow a particular order.

POST 3Original post

We'll, they're stupid internal model designations. And you know they had meetings around a big conference table to decide the next number to use.

POST 4Original post

[Image-only or quote-only post; no author-written text.]

POST 5Original post

Yea I dont get it eaither. Also, I think the 912 was before the 911 . No sense. And now I can't keep the latest model for the Cayman , Boxster , and " 911 " numbers straight at all. Yea, I may be getting old. But some logic would be nice. Im glad Im not the only one. :beer:

POST 6Original post

I agree, best car worst name ever. Come on, what are they thinking, no where to go but down from here..

POST 7Original post

No big deal really, as it's only the enthusiasts that use the platform models, where as most others call it a 2004 911 or 1999 Boxster etc. Still I'm not sure what their logic is with it all and why it can't be just sequential. Worse still is the Cayenne which went 9PA, 9PA1 and then 92A. Interpol, actually the model designations are not just internal i.e. for project management and production. They are used within the parts program to identify the models, but also your VIN contains this same model number, and so you could say it's in the public domain as well. Add to that if you consider that the 356, 911 , 912, 914, 944, 924, 928, 959 were all sold by their three digit codes then I guess Porsche 's changes make even less sense. The 912 was released after 911 and is the same car but to try and increase sales they dropped in a 4-cylinder version making it a cheaper car to buy. Got a friend who has one, along with his 964 RS and 993 RS

POST 8Original post

I found this screamingly funny. Spilled my coffee. I'm not making fun, just the image of meetings around a big conference table to decide the next number made me laugh out loud.:cheers:

POST 9Original post

I know I could never keep them straight so I refuse to participate in those "naming conventions". For me it's model name and year, just like almost every other car on the road. Well except maybe for Ferrari which I also can't get my mind around.:cheers:

POST 10Original post

From Wikipedia 911 nomenclature[ edit ] Although Porsche internally changes the headings for its models, all 911 models were and are currently sold as a "911". The headings below use Porsche's internal classifications: Porsche 911 (1963–1989) Porsche 930 a turbo version of the original 911 Porsche 964 (1989–1994) Porsche 993 (1993–1998) Porsche 996 (1999–2005) all-new body and water-cooled engines Porsche 997 (2005–2012) Porsche 991 (2012–Present) The series letter (A, B, C, etc.) is used by Porsche to indicate the revision for production cars. It often changes annually to reflect changes for the new model year . The first 911 models are the "A series", the first 993 cars are the "R series". Not all of the Porsche 911 models ever produced are mentioned here. The listed models are notable for their role in the advancements in technology and their influence on other vehicles from Porsche. Looks like they went up and up, didnt want to peek out with a 999 and are now on the way back down again.

POST 11Original post

If I wanted to buy the latest and greatest 911 , I guess I'd get the 997 since the 991 seems like a downgrade.

POST 12Original post

At least Ferrari numbers are related to engine specs and keep increasing

POST 13Original post

The 911 started as a 901. But Peugeot have the monopoly on using a zero in their naming schemes (even back then) so they had to change it to 911

POST 14Original post

Actually to make matters confused further, the first " 911 " was a 901, but since Peugeot owned the rights to 3 number model names with a 0 in the middle (e.g., 504 and etc.) Porsche decided to go with 911 (which has since become very iconic). The next one was not 930, but it was called the "G Series". I actually like the fact that they jump around their code names, as it separates the wheat from the chaff if you know what I mean

POST 15Original post

I am relieved not to be the only one confused by Porsche 's "system", which is rivalled by John Deere 's. They will repeat numbers, often decades apart- I have a 7520 circa 2006, but there are 7520's still in use that were built in the 70's, albeit a completely different beast. Does anyone know of a poster that would show profiles, dates, model numbers etc of all the models Porsche has produced? Would be a handy reference for those of us not lifelong afficionados.

POST 16Original post

Bottom of page Porsche 911 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.