fullymatted.
Back to search
PistonHeads

Spyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
45 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHSpyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Reported or suspected cause

most would have saved the £6k

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

Would punters still have got excited if Cayman GTS came with a similar chassis to the gt4 but retaining the 3.4 but costing £6k more than say a regular CaymanGTS with x73 suspension?i suspect most would have saved the £6k!

Spyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Suspected cause

Would punters still have got excited if Cayman GTS came with a similar chassis to the gt4 but retaining the 3.4 but costing £6k more than say a regular CaymanGTS with x73 suspension?i suspect most would have saved the £6k!

Spyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Suspected cause

Would punters still have got excited if Cayman GTS came with a similar chassis to the gt4 but retaining the 3.4 but costing £6k more than say a regular CaymanGTS with x73 suspension?i suspect most would have saved the £6k!

Spyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Frequently discussed work

Run last n/a flat six

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I do get the feeling that Porsche will milk the "limited run last N/A flat six with manual" cow for a very long time to come.

Spyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'most would have saved the £6k' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'most would have saved the £6k' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Run last n/a flat six' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 45 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 4 other evidence results

Run last n/a flat six

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I do get the feeling that Porsche will milk the "limited run last N/A flat six with manual" cow for a very long time to come.

Spyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Set ups and hardware, they are quite different

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Please read the technical differences between the two cars suspension set ups and hardware, they are quite different.

Spyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Suggestion

Please read the technical differences between the two cars suspension set ups and hardware, they are quite different.

Spyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Set ups and hardware.not much difference in hardware

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Please read the technical differences between the two cars suspension set ups and hardware.not much difference in hardware !

Spyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Use /enjoyment

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Any further crossover of GT4 parts is almost certainly unnecessary and would be detrimental to the Spyder's road use/enjoyment.

Spyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Frequently discussed actions (6)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run last n/a flat six

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I do get the feeling that Porsche will milk the "limited run last N/A flat six with manual" cow for a very long time to come.

Spyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Set ups and hardware, they are quite different

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Please read the technical differences between the two cars suspension set ups and hardware, they are quite different.

Spyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Suggestion

Please read the technical differences between the two cars suspension set ups and hardware, they are quite different.

Spyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Set ups and hardware.not much difference in hardware

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Please read the technical differences between the two cars suspension set ups and hardware.not much difference in hardware !

Spyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Use /enjoyment

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Any further crossover of GT4 parts is almost certainly unnecessary and would be detrimental to the Spyder's road use/enjoyment.

Spyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Use on the road

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

The original Porsche 550 Spyder was a racing car that could be used on the road, so it's in the genes.

Spyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Use which would not apply

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

The absence of front lift option on the GT4 is in itself quite a restricting factor for normal road use which would not apply to the Spyder.

Spyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

most would have saved the £6k

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

Would punters still have got excited if Cayman GTS came with a similar chassis to the gt4 but retaining the 3.4 but costing £6k more than say a regular CaymanGTS with x73 suspension?i suspect most would have saved the £6k!

Spyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Suspected cause

Would punters still have got excited if Cayman GTS came with a similar chassis to the gt4 but retaining the 3.4 but costing £6k more than say a regular CaymanGTS with x73 suspension?i suspect most would have saved the £6k!

Spyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Suspected cause

Would punters still have got excited if Cayman GTS came with a similar chassis to the gt4 but retaining the 3.4 but costing £6k more than say a regular CaymanGTS with x73 suspension?i suspect most would have saved the £6k!

Spyder GT 4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

45 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • PistonHeads: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T150451Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

ANyone else seen the report in Autocar today that Porsche is considering a GT4 version f Spyder ? Here we go again !!

POST 2Original post

Johnthepotter said: ANyone else seen the report in Autocar today that Porsche is considering a GT4 version f Spyder ? Here we go again !! Have you been in a bubble since 31st March? Did you miss the 2015 Boxster Spyder launch?

POST 3Original post

g7jhp said: Have you been in a bubble since 31st March? Did you miss the 2015 Boxster Spyder launch? The Spyder GT4 is a different car to the Spyder..... read the post!

POST 4Original post

Autocar reporting that after the Spyder they are considering a GT4 Spyder

POST 5Original post

Scott Parker said: The Spyder GT4 is a different car to the Spyder..... read the post! I read the post. I know the OP owns a 987 Spyder.

POST 6Original post

Any links to article ? I cant find any reference on there website

POST 7 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

GT3CS - nothing on web site but it has a half page spread in this week's magazine. Too long to repeat here but extract "...... a senior source at Porsche said we are looking at it right now. Much of the engineering has already been done for the Cayman so we think this miight be a good direction for us....." It also suggests that an RS Version of GT4 is now more likely given success of GT4!

POST 8Original post

Johnthepotter said: It also suggests that an RS Version of GT4 is now more likely given success of GT4! I would genuinely immediately sell my CGTS to bankroll a GT4 RS - that would be a car to have! +400 hp and PDK + yes please Assuming the fantasy that PGB also would actually sell me one as i'm not currently in the circle of trust or a disappointed GT3 RS customer

POST 9Original post

These rumours were around even before the 981 Spyder was revealed. There was and still is talk about another "hot Boxster", a Spyder RS, essentially a GT4 with the Spyder body, positioned just below the GT4 RS. I'm sure the market would snap them up but it's all getting a bit silly if you ask me. I do get the feeling that Porsche will milk the "limited run last N/A flat six with manual" cow for a very long time to come.

POST 10Original post

My dealer confirmed that they have spoken to Porsche and this isn't happening?

POST 11Original post

anonymous said: [redacted] Spot on - I also think that further na development of the GT cars doesn't have to be synonymous with the end of the na and models life. The coming refresh of b/cayman into pot4 will be for their mainstream cars, keeping the GT products na (and extending on this platform) is a great way to maintain that halo and the motorsport equity within the brand - which brings new entry level customers forward, not as enthusiasts but because of the badge and the product their perceived to be buying

POST 12Original post

U Johnthepotter said: ANyone else seen the report in Autocar today that Porsche is considering a GT4 version f Spyder ? Here we go again !! Hi all....!! Long time lurker on the Porsche forum, but felt compelled to start contributing following the press release of the Gen2 Boxster Spyder... I have a Gen1 Spyder, which I absolutely adore, but have been tempted by the new Spyder model.... So much so, I have a deposit down for the new model at my OPC.....! BUT, some of the "rumours" surrounding the possible release of an "improved" GT4 version of the newest Spyder are getting me nervous!! If such a car, as suggested by Autocar this week, would be essentially the topless version of the GT4, for presumably not much more money, would I be wiser to "wait and see" what Porsche come up with...? I was really hoping to get "the last of its kind" in this new Spyder, but I'm starting to wonder whether Porsche will indeed "milk" this model as far as possible..... Dave

POST 13Original post

If you can get a 981 Spyder I would as it'll be sought after, so you can always ask your OPC for the option to trade up.

POST 14Original post

g7jhp said: If you can get a 981 Spyder I would as it'll be sought after, so you can always ask your OPC for the option to trade up. Can someone please explain to me how many Spyder versions exist currently, and the new offerings?

POST 15Original post

anonymous said: [redacted] +1 the ones with the hump! 987 Spyder (2010) 981 Spyder (New)

POST 16Original post

anonymous said: [redacted] Thanks So are these related to the Cayman R & the new GT4?

POST 17Original post

anonymous said: [redacted] Thanks, and I suppose the 981 Spyder will sport the GT4 engine, or not...

POST 18Original post

anonymous said: [redacted] That sums it up perfectly for me, thank you.

POST 19Original post

Essentially the spyder is already nearly all gt4 with a soft top!the fact it has different suspension although very good and may suit the car chassis better on the road than the race track bias gt4 suspension!i am sure if you do a lot of track days the spyder suspension could be improved upon to better the gt4! IMHO the gt4 will not be a "race" car until it gets a proper Motorsport engine and I suspect the gt4 RS ( track car)has a version of the gt3/ RS engine . IMHO the gt4 is no more a gt car than say a 997 S with Motorsport suspension and. Aero is to a 997 Gt3. I think they both 981 Spyder/gt4 are excellent cars in the same way the 987 spyder and CR are but in no way is the 981 spyder inferior to the gt4 just different and more suited to where it will spend most of its time! So I cannot see a gt4 spyder when one already exists albeit not as track focused. Only future gt cars will have a NA engine so I suspect future Spyders if built will have fl4 turbo and the gt4 a version of the gt3/ RS engine making the current gt4 a bit of a marketing exercise and future models costing closer to £100 k than £70 k

POST 20Original post

I would agree with a GT4 Spyder being unlikely. The new 981 Spyder is niche enough with av 1 max 2 per OPC expected so any further hardcoring of the model would be super niche......

POST 21Original post

itsybitsy said: Essentially the spyder is already nearly all gt4 with a soft top!the fact it has different suspension although very good and may suit the car chassis better on the road than the race track bias gt4 suspension!i am sure if you do a lot of track days the spyder suspension could be improved upon to better the gt4! IMHO the gt4 will not be a "race" car until it gets a proper Motorsport engine and I suspect the gt4 RS ( track car)has a version of the gt3/ RS engine . IMHO the gt4 is no more a gt car than say a 997 S with Motorsport suspension and. Aero is to a 997 Gt3. I think they both 981 Spyder/gt4 are excellent cars in the same way the 987 spyder and CR are but in no way is the 981 spyder inferior to the gt4 just different and more suited to where it will spend most of its time! So I cannot see a gt4 spyder when one already exists albeit not as track focused. Only future gt cars will have a NA engine so I suspect future Spyders if built will have fl4 turbo and the gt4 a version of the gt3/ RS engine making the current gt4 a bit of a marketing exercise and future models costing closer to £100 k than £70 k Nobody asked you to defend your purchase, we are just discussing rumours about a potential new car from Porsche.

POST 22Original post

Not defending any purchase it's just an observation that's all !the spyder doesn't pretend to be a track car but instead a really great road car and for me passive suspension is a plus over PASM and I for one would have been happy if the gt4 had passive ( like the 6 gt3rs) and not pasm!

POST 23Original post

anonymous said: [redacted] Which at the end of all said is what you can do to the spyder thus giving it the same if not better chassis than a gt4 and would still have the same engine ! Would punters still have got excited if Cayman GTS came with a similar chassis to the gt4 but retaining the 3.4 but costing £6k more than say a regular CaymanGTS with x73 suspension?i suspect most would have saved the £6k! The big draw for most on both the new cars is the engine!

POST 24Original post

av185 said: I would agree with a GT4 Spyder being unlikely. The new 981 Spyder is niche enough with av 1 max 2 per OPC expected so any further hardcoring of the model would be super niche...... I would tend to agree. Surely Porsche would be jeopardising their own "halo" creations if they subsequently "tinkered" with the end results, merely in order to extract maximum marketing exposure...? I would have hoped that if Porsche really felt that a "GT4 Spyder" was necessary, it would have taken the place of the new 981 Spyder, rather than be a further "add-on" to the model range. What's more, where on earth would they place a GT4 Spyder in the current model range...? As the Cayman GT4 is only £5k more expensive than the new Spyder, Porsche have got a VERY narrow pricing bracket to work within.... Unless they make it MORE expensive than the new Cayman.... But surely that would be ridiculous, considering Porsche's pricing structure for the rest of the Boxster/ Cayman range, ie. the Boxster is consistently the cheaper of the two!!

POST 25Original post

itsybitsy said: Which at the end of all said is what you can do to the spyder thus giving it the same if not better chassis than a gt4 and would still have the same engine ! Would punters still have got excited if Cayman GTS came with a similar chassis to the gt4 but retaining the 3.4 but costing £6k more than say a regular CaymanGTS with x73 suspension?i suspect most would have saved the £6k! The big draw for most on both the new cars is the engine! I have a GT4 on order and I am sorry but you are way off the mark. In no specific order the things that attract me to the car are : the manual gearbox (reworked by the GT department), the GT3 brakes, adjustable aero with downforce,the adjustablility of the suspension settings, adjustable anti-roll bars, GT3 front end, the clubsport package... The engine is all well and good but without the above It only adds to straight line speed. Please read the technical differences between the two cars suspension set ups and hardware, they are quite different. In my opinion the Spyder will be a great car but it is not the same as a GT car however much you want to convince yourself otherwise. Edited by lsb on Saturday 11th April 21:21

POST 26Original post

lsb said: itsybitsy said: Which at the end of all said is what you can do to the spyder thus giving it the same if not better chassis than a gt4 and would still have the same engine ! Would punters still have got excited if Cayman GTS came with a similar chassis to the gt4 but retaining the 3.4 but costing £6k more than say a regular CaymanGTS with x73 suspension?i suspect most would have saved the £6k! The big draw for most on both the new cars is the engine! I have a GT4 on order and I am sorry but you are way off the mark. In no specific order the things that attract me to the car are : the manual gearbox (reworked by the GT department), the GT3 brakes, adjustable aero with downforce,the adjustablility of the suspension settings, adjustable anti-roll bars, GT3 front end, the clubsport package... The engine is all well and good but without the above It only adds to straight line speed. Please read the technical differences between the two cars suspension set ups and hardware, they are quite different. In my opinion the Spyder will be a great car but it is not the same as a GT car however much you want to convince yourself otherwise. Edited by lsb on Saturday 11th April 21:21 We are basically talking about the GT4 being more hardcore than the Spyder...and rightly so. Not necessarily better road performance in the real world...but more track friendly similar to the GT3. Anyway, who wants a convertible track weapon?....not me....but the slightly less power and non GT but 'sports' tuned suspension will like as not be compensated by the reduced weight.....making road real world road performance very similar between the two cars.

POST 27Original post

lsb said: I have a GT4 on order and I am sorry but you are way off the mark. In no specific order the things that attract me to the car are : the manual gearbox (reworked by the GT department), t Which is the same as the spyder and GTS models albeit a shorter gear shift! The GT3 brakes, adjustable aero with downforce,the adjustablility of the suspension settings, adjustable anti-roll bars, GT3 front end, the clubsport package... Which are not needed on a road ,occasional track car! The suspension I have mentioned not being needed in a road car! The engine is all well and good but without the above It only adds to straight line speed.not true as the spyder is only 8 seconds slower on inferior tyres so on the same tyres is not much slower ! Please read the technical differences between the two cars suspension set ups and hardware.not much difference in hardware ! they are quite different. In my opinion the Spyder will be a great car but it is not the same as a GT car however much you want to convince yourself otherwise. I am not trying to convince myself! I really think the gt4. Is being talked up if you want a track bias car buy a 997 gt3 whereas the spyder is the better road bias car over a gt4 Edited by lsb on Saturday 11th April 21:21[/footnote] [footnote]Edited by itsybitsy on Saturday 11th April 21:46

POST 28Original post

av185 said: We are basically talking about the GT4 being more hardcore than the Spyder...and rightly so. Not necessarily better road performance in the real world...but more track friendly similar to the GT3. Anyway, who wants a convertible track weapon?....not me....but the slightly less power and non GT but 'sports' tuned suspension will like as not be compensated by the reduced weight.....making road real world road performance very similar between the two cars. I agree a convertible is not the best track weapon hence porsche developed a gt4 Cayman and not a. Boxster gt4 ! Both cars have had there chassis developed for different uses but there really is not much between them until porsche put a Motorsport engine in a gt4!

POST 29Original post

itsybitsy said: Edited by itsybitsy on Saturday 11th April 21:46 No, you are right. That in- depth answer has convinced me that the GT4 is being "talked up" whilst the Spyder isn't a clever piece of timing on Porsche part by tagging onto the GT4 momentum and getting disgruntled customers who did not get an allocation a great consolation prize; instead it is much better on the road whilst being just as quick on track - a car that has no compromise it seems. Thanks for sharing your extensive knowledge which is so obviously superior to technical details I have previously read.

POST 30Original post

lsb said: No, you are right. That in- depth answer has convinced me that the GT4 is being "talked up" whilst the Spyder isn't a clever piece of timing on Porsche part by tagging onto the GT4 momentum and getting disgruntled customers who did not get an allocation a great consolation prize; instead it is much better on the road whilst being just as quick on track - a car that has no compromise it seems. so there is half as many spyders to gt4 coming that will satisfy all those disgruntled customers who did not get an allocation? Thanks for sharing your extensive knowledge which is so obviously superior to technical details I have previously read. i have no superior knowledge but a man who does {walter rohl} is buying a spyder and not a gt4! as for one who has no interest in either car at the moment i am only stating observations and if i wanted the superior track car then there is no subsitute to a 997.2 gt3!

POST 31Original post

I doubt Walter Rohrl has to "buy" his car :-) I have no doubt that the Spyder will be a great car but I doubt that the months spent by the GT team have counted for nothing when differentiating between the two cars. After owning and tracking a 996 GT3 and a 996 RS and driving a 997 RS I look forward to trying something different in the Porsche range. I am not sure how you are so sure a 997.2 GT3 is superior if you have not driven both - you may well be right but how can you write with such utter conviction without first hand experience ?? Opinion and fact are not the same thing. Substituting the former for the latter is just hot air. Edited by lsb on Saturday 11th April 23:14 Edited by lsb on Saturday 11th April 23:16

POST 32Original post

To put my side of my argument to bed until we get some real road tests is I feel the Spyder will be the better road car with occasional track use and the gt4 a better track car with occasional road use ! But I would be happy with either car and that is a dilemma I have at the moment on which way to jump. also would not be surprised if some of the development of the gt4 crossed over into the Spyder.,and it's chassis is not lesser just more suited,so back to the topic I don't think there will be a gt4 spyder

POST 33Original post

itsybitsy said: To put my side of my argument to bed until we get some real road tests is I feel the Spyder will be the better road car with occasional track use and the gt4 a better track car with occasional road use ! But I would be happy with either car and that is a dilemma I have at the moment on which way to jump. also would not be surprised if some of the development of the gt4 crossed over into the Spyder.,and it's chassis is not lesser just more suited,so back to the topic I don't think there will be a gt4 spyder +1 Producing a "GT4" Spyder would fly-in-the-face of conventional beliefs regarding the intended uses of both cars: dedicated track cars get a hard-top, sunny-day road cars get the soft-top.... To create a razor-focussed track set up on the 981 Spyder would seem a bit of an oxymoron.... The new car appears to have the necessary "upgrades" (brakes, engine, aerodynamics) to suit it's purpose well, AND perform well on track. Any further crossover of GT4 parts is almost certainly unnecessary and would be detrimental to the Spyder's road use/enjoyment. The ONLY viable reason Porsche could have for such an upgrade to the new Spyder would surely be to "milk" the car until it runs dry.... Which would be a HUGE shame.

POST 34Original post

The absence of front lift option on the GT4 is in itself quite a restricting factor for normal road use which would not apply to the Spyder.

POST 35Original post

http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/porsche...

POST 36Original post

EricE said: http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/porsche... See first post on this thread?

POST 37Original post

Beaver said: EricE said: http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/porsche... See first post on this thread? I think EricE is just adding the article, which the OP wasn't able to do last week. So potential GT4 Spyder and GT4 RS, would be great. More likely to be just another Autocar story rather than reality!

POST 38Original post

g7jhp said: So potential GT4 Spyder and GT4 RS, would be great. Great if you missed out on the new Spyder, not so great if you've just bought one and Porsche then release a "hot" version for only a couple of grand more....!!

POST 39Original post

Swimfinz said: g7jhp said: So potential GT4 Spyder and GT4 RS, would be great. Great if you missed out on the new Spyder, not so great if you've just bought one and Porsche then release a "hot" version for only a couple of grand more....!! True, but as you have an original 987 Spyder and a new 981 Spyder should you choose, you can't complain too much....unless you're just speculating!

POST 40Original post

g7jhp said: True, but as you have an original 987 Spyder and a new 981 Spyder should you choose, you can't complain too much....unless you're just speculating! I wish I was in a position to speculate!! Unfortunately, in order to get hold of the new 981 Spyder I'm going to have to part with my beautiful 987 model.... A REALLY painful decision to make.... That's why I'm so determined to make the "right" decision: something difficult to do in the absence of experienced journo road-tests/ test-drives etc....Getting hold of one of the "last of its kind" in the 981 Spyder is a big factor in my decision to change, hence my concerns over any imminent "GT" version of the new car.... Trying to get an answer from the OPCs regarding this is like drawing blood from a stone....!!! I simply get the "we don't get told anything" answer, which I find pretty unbelievable...!!

POST 41Original post

Swimfinz said: I wish I was in a position to speculate!! Unfortunately, in order to get hold of the new 981 Spyder I'm going to have to part with my beautiful 987 model.... A REALLY painful decision to make.... That's why I'm so determined to make the "right" decision: something difficult to do in the absence of experienced journo road-tests/ test-drives etc....Getting hold of one of the "last of its kind" in the 981 Spyder is a big factor in my decision to change, hence my concerns over any imminent "GT" version of the new car.... Trying to get an answer from the OPCs regarding this is like drawing blood from a stone....!!! I simply get the "we don't get told anything" answer, which I find pretty unbelievable...!! Why do you find it unbelievable, I would be much more surprised if they had any idea about what is likely to happen over the next 12 -36 months, that sort of knowledge would be for the Porsche top brass not the field troops. I would guess they get a lot of their ideas on what is happening from the same media sources as the rest of us.

POST 42Original post

anonymous said: [redacted] Surely they will just wait for the mid life refresh of the 981, this would enable them to refresh the pricing (providing a justification). It would also make sense to release further GT versions i.e. RS etc.. to provide another halo product sat above the mainstream product range especially if the refresh brings with i pot4s. A better question might be what other motorsport projects do we actually think would be worked on instead? Well a GT2 is at least 18 months away.. I think its likely we see a GT4 RS before that and accompanied with a hotter GT Boxster - certainly from a product development pov it would be an easy way to carve out another latest variant, whilst completing little further R&D

POST 43Original post

I thought it was quite obvious that the new Spyder was created to regain some of the development costs for the GT4. It does share a few parts like the engine (which had to be modified to fit into the 981 platform), manual transmission with torque limiter, bumpers, some calibration and various other bits and bobs. A GT4 RS seems as good as confirmed due to the extreme success of the GT4, why would they pass up an opportunity to do the same thing again with the Boxster? Chances are that both cars will be N/A 6-cylinder and manual-only which should make them an even more attractive package in the future when the "regular" line-up gets downsized 4-cylinder turbos to meet Co2 regulations. We should be thankful that Porsche gives enthusiasts these gems, go out and try to buy a quick new N/A manual BMW and tell me how it went.

POST 44Original post

A GT4 RS is a fairly logical step. I'm sure it would be very desirable and would also fit within the overall range well. But a GT4 Spyder a bit less so. The big point about the GT4 was the fact it was full Motorsport dept car. Would the ethics of the Motorsport dept develop an open top (boxster based car). The Motorsport cars are all deliberately coupe shells (unless they have a carbon tub to play with). There has been no rush to create a GT3 convertible/targa ever. On the Boxster how would the clubsport package look? The big rear wing? I think it would devalue the motorsport element of porsche. I personally think a GT4 Spyder on top of the range is going too far. The Spyder model isn't actually meant to be limited anyway, so they could get more return back by simply producing more Spyders. The nice thing about porsche is that the range is normally quite predictable with steps to not date models that quickly or catch buyers by surprise. If you buy a certain model, you know where in the range it sits and what to expect above or below it. You don't buy a Carrera S and then get miffed they've brought out faster models. If I bought a new Spyder though, I would not expect a higher model boxster to come along. It's why I went away from lotus. If you buy a model, you don't know what is around the corner that will date it or supersede it. It's also why I would not buy (if I actually could) a new Mclaren. One minute you have the latest model, the next there is a special edition or an update with a new face slapped onto it.

POST 45Original post

DS240 said: A GT4 RS is a fairly logical step. I'm sure it would be very desirable and would also fit within the overall range well. But a GT4 Spyder a bit less so. The big point about the GT4 was the fact it was full Motorsport dept car. Would the ethics of the Motorsport dept develop an open top (boxster based car). The Motorsport cars are all deliberately coupe shells (unless they have a carbon tub to play with). There has been no rush to create a GT3 convertible/targa ever. On the Boxster how would the clubsport package look? The big rear wing? I think it would devalue the motorsport element of porsche. I think it's right the GT3 doesn't go convertible/targa - the turbo fills that spot. Porsche does have the 918 Spyder and I think there's room for a more focused GT4 Spyder. Most of the more focused motorsport manufacturers offer open top cars - Radical, Caterham, Lotus etc. The original Porsche 550 Spyder was a racing car that could be used on the road, so it's in the genes. DS240 said: The nice thing about porsche is that the range is normally quite predictable with steps to not date models that quickly or catch buyers by surprise. If you buy a certain model, you know where in the range it sits and what to expect above or below it. You don't buy a Carrera S and then get miffed they've brought out faster models. If I bought a new Spyder though, I would not expect a higher model boxster to come along. Didn't they do exactly this when they introduced the 997 GTS over the 997 C2S? Although not as drastic as some, Porsche still have a history of introducing 'special editions' usually to sell through product before the new platform model. Anniversary cars, black editions, turbo S, 918 Spyder edition etc

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.