6 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHBore liner failure
Reported or suspected cause
hartech - they have a great write up
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
The best site I've found for detail on the issue is hartech - they have a great write up.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Liners split due to the material used (the characteristics of it specifically), which is why you can replace them with a new sleeve and ring that helps prevent the warp and ring distortion.
Leading evidence: 'hartech - they have a great write up' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'hartech - they have a great write up' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Use (the characteristics of it specifically)' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Liners split due to the material used (the characteristics of it specifically), which is why you can replace them with a new sleeve and ring that helps prevent the warp and ring distortion.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I'd estimate that about 5% of engines fail, but the reality is that they will all fail at some point, because of the rounding nature of the cylinders (due to the material used).
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Use (the characteristics of it specifically)
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Liners split due to the material used (the characteristics of it specifically), which is why you can replace them with a new sleeve and ring that helps prevent the warp and ring distortion.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I'd estimate that about 5% of engines fail, but the reality is that they will all fail at some point, because of the rounding nature of the cylinders (due to the material used).
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T174436Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Ok , does anyone know if Porsche have issued an accurate percentage of 996 liner failures ?
Does anyone else know of this number.
Is there any tell tale signs before it happens or is it just a case of now it works...eer now its broke !
Although this is a good forum for Porsche devotees talking about the car that they love, they do however tend to view all things Porsche through rose tinted glasses.
With this in mind, you are not likely to gather the information that you are asking for on here.
However, there is a thread on this forum that might be of help to you.
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=48&t=400915&mid=167766&nmt=996
wet-sump engine reliability: enter your statistics here!
Hmm, that's a bit harsh actually - I don't think many of us fail to see the failings of these cars.
The problem (as has been discussed loads of times) is that you never get a true reflection of the amount of engine failures, because a lot of people only post when there's an issue.
The best site I've found for detail on the issue is hartech - they have a great write up.
I'd estimate that about 5% of engines fail, but the reality is that they will all fail at some point, because of the rounding nature of the cylinders (due to the material used).
It appears that if a car has been properly warmed up and driven well (ie. not had a missed gear), then they typically (there's always exceptions) are fine.
It doesn't appear to be mileage related, although people have observed that engines that are typically going to go, break at less than 40k and if they haven't by then, they should last a while.
You can get the engine lokasil'd at places like Autofarm and Hartech.
Engines can just give with no warning at all, but usually there's a tapping noise before hand.
However, some engines make this noise and there's no problem at all.
Oil consumption doesn't appear to be a factor and neither does the RMS.
Although, there's a suggestion that OPCs may have contributed towards the perceived RMS problem by replacing them as soon as they started to leak (as it was easy money, covered under warranty!).
Later engines are typically better than the newer engines, but there's plenty of examples of later 996 and even 997 engines failing with the same problem.
So, my advice is when buying a car, get one that you are happy has been well looked after, get a PPI and buy on condition.
The PPI doesn't do an internal engine inspection, but they can listen to the engine for any tell tail sign.
Also, if you're worried about it, consider a warranty.
Hartech do a fantastic lifetime warranty plan, you can also buy reconditioned engines from them (and also Autofarm).
The only problem with Hartech is that they are based in Bolton and it's quite a journey for service if you live in the South.
PS - no Porsche have never issued this information and IMO won't ever either - because it would be an admittance of a definite design flaw.
The other thing about liners is you need to watch certain warranties - as they specifically exclude this.
Liners split due to the material used (the characteristics of it specifically), which is why you can replace them with a new sleeve and ring that helps prevent the warp and ring distortion.
Unfortunately you can only find out the state of your engine and whether it needs doing once it's been stripped!
No Porsche have not issued any numbers on this and dont even really ever talk about it as a problem.
General view is that between 5 and 10% of engines are affected by this or IMS failure but nobody has solid figures. Also there is a view that if your engine has got to 80k then its unlikely to suffer. (except of course if its mine which went at 83k!)
There are a few signs to watch for: slight loss of coolant, exsessive pressurisation of the cooling system, oil in coolant and coolant in oil with excessive sludge around the filler cap (on a fit engine there is usually a little "mayonaise" present.)
That said nearly all of these symptoms can be something else.
For more info and interesting reading (if a bit scary) go to the AUTOFARM and Hartech web sites . Both companies do remedial work and have engineered design improvements to rectify and then reduce the likelihood of repetition.
I have an Autofarm re-engineered sillsleve engine in mine.