8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHViewing Please Help
Leading reported evidence
Check aircon works well (front condesors corrode)
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Check aircon works well (front condesors corrode)' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check aircon works well (front condesors corrode)' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Obviously if the car needs a new clutch fitting a new RMS and IMS seal (and inspecting their general health) is a no-brainer.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T044418Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi All going to take a look at a 50000 miles 996 Carrera 4S 2002 (52) with sat nav and dealer service and specialist. Can anybody tell me what to look out for. Many, Many Thanks
Best to get a proper PPI done but failing that....
Oil leaks from RMS/IMS area under engine
Coolant level (should be at max)
Oil in coolant
Coolant in oil
Brake disc wear
Rust on inside face of brake discs
Suspension clonks and rattles.
Tyres and tyre wear pattern
Check aircon works well (front condesors corrode)
Accident damage/ repainting
History
Others will add more I am sure...
Conversely, if you take the oil filler cap off and see some "mayonnaise" - which would be a warning sign on most cars - don't panic. They nearly all seem to do that, based on threads on here.
Car looked fantastic, but on last service advisory for Main oil seal and slight leak from water pump.It is not dropping oil and found no trace of water under engine though it was a bit difficult to see. Been quoted 850 inc clutch for oil seal and around 5 hrs for water pump and 240 to buy pump.
Has anyone else found any water pump issues, i know main seal is prone.
Thanks
I found this document really useful when I was looking for my C4S. I walked away from one because it needed new rads, discs and pads all round and I thought the clutch was on its way out.
In 9/10 cases I would probably be more worried about the water pump.
The RMS seals, even when new, are lucky to seal 100% for any decent period without "misting". (if case halfs are not well matched any number of RMS seals will not seal perfectly)
It is suggested to ignore slight RMS mistings as a new one may even seat less well - as a case of better the devil you know.
Obviously this "ignore" response is once any other causation (IMS etc)
has been ruled out, which may require more immediate TLC.
Also note that many OPCs will routinely add "RMS" to an inspection as it is a nice little earner.
You need the RMS independently verified or just another (trusted) OPC's second opinion.
Obviously if the car needs a new clutch fitting a new RMS and IMS seal (and inspecting their general health) is a no-brainer.
Plus ifan OPC does it (or reputable indy) you will (should) get a decent warranty to cover if it requires remedial work to seal again
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
