16 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWhy amber side markers?
Leading reported evidence
Replace make our caymans go faster
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Replace make our caymans go faster' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace make our caymans go faster' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
people do these type of things to be a little different--back in the 70's i changed my usa 914 front and back lens to the european versions--thought it looked cool back then--now i don't care--i do like the all red tail lights but i would not spend money on them--my cs msrp was $75k
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Probably just me, but American and Japanese cars that still use red directionals are a major turn-OFF.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
people do these type of things to be a little different--back in the 70's i changed my usa 914 front and back lens to the european versions--thought it looked cool back then--now i don't care--i do like the all red tail lights but i would not spend money on them--my cs msrp was $75k
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Planet-9: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T222516Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
So out of curiosity, does anyone know why Porsche has insisted on amber side markers in the US for so long?
Are amber reflectors at the corners a DOT requirement, or perhaps a requirement in a large Porsche sales state like California?
Just curious as I of course had to make the same change to clears on my 2003 Boxster S, and some six years later found myself having to buy clears for my CS.
It is a DOT requirement. They need to be amber reflectors, not just lights. I guess DOT wants your car to be seen from the side even when the lights are not on.
Reflector requirements
I think that Porsche installs amber side marker assemblies to help satisfy the Federal requirement for reflectors (FMVSS No. 108). The following quote is from the
NHTSA legal interpretations database
, dated 4/7/2000:
The amber side markers (987 631 037 / 987 631 038) contain an amber reflex reflector. The clear ones (987 631 033 / 987 631 034) don't.
Interesting fact...
So, anyone know which state(s) have laws requiring amber side reflex reflectors? I'll start; NC doesn't.
I would flip it around and say "Why the fascination with clear side markers"?
It was no different when I frequented the 964 forums. I personally have never found anything particularly ugly about amber side markers, and was never motivated to change them on the 911 or the Croc.
And don't get me started on Red Tail Lights!
Too many other things I would love to do to the car that are way higher on the someday modification list (LSD anyone???).
Brian
people do these type of things to be a little different--back in the 70's i changed my usa 914 front and back lens to the european versions--thought it looked cool back then--now i don't care--i do like the all red tail lights but i would not spend money on them--my cs msrp was $75k
Ironically, when American cars first had amber front turn signals ('63 model year), Ford started with amber bulbs, but went to clear bulbs and amber lenses for the mid-year "63 1/2" models. Eventually, amber bulbs with clear lenses became the accepted standard. For the 1978 model year, Cadillac put amber lenses on its recently-downsized DeVilles and Fleetwoods, to give the cars "greater road presence." They later followed suit on the Eldorado. Meanwhile, some American automakers wanted a more "European" look, and went with amber rear turn signal lenses. Suddenly, clear lenses became the rage (the Lexus RX 350 has albino-looking rear lights), and any hint of amber is out. Now, Porsche charges more for all-red rear lenses. A little too fadish, if you ask me! 987f
Gimme amber...
Always been easier for me to see amber/yellow (turn indicators and side markers) than red or clear. And I've always associated amber turn signals with more modern vehicles. Probably just me, but American and Japanese cars that still use red directionals are a major turn-OFF. Can you tell if the yahoo joker in front of you is signaling a turn, or just has a brake light out and is tapping his/her foot??
It's kind of funny....Corvette guys like to swap their red taillights for Euro styled ones w/ amber turn signals. A handful of Porsche guys are going the other direction to full red, and Japanese modders like anything clear.
I guess the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence when it comes to lens colors!
+1 on that, I just think the car looks better with clear side marker if you have a dark car, the stock amber side marker will stand out too much with a dark colored car.
It's only a $30 mod and can be done in less than 10 minutes, which also helps since cost is not a setback.
My CS is Speed Yellow as was my Boxster S.
The amber and the yellow just seem to clash to me, with the clear a much nicer look.
It doesn't seem to make quite as much a difference with other body colors, and IMHO the ambers actually look better than the clears on silver as clear on silver goes invisible.