13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 cat D
Leading reported evidence
Install wrong
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Install wrong' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check electrical things' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Cat D is no problem, just inspect the car as thoroughly as you would any used car purchase.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Cat D is no problem, just inspect the car as thoroughly as you would any used car purchase.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T183130Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi everyone, my 996 search continues I've recently looked at a 996 cabriolet on 103k , it's a cat d , due to vandalism all sorted now and looking fine you'd never know I've had an offer of 8 k accepted , what does everything ? Incidentally I've noticed it has an aireal just above the windscreen, I'm guessing this isn't normal as I haven't seen it on any others , it has an aftermarket sound system Bluetooth etc fitted .
Here's the ad description ,I'll try and get some pics up . Excellent condition for year, just had major service, including gear box oil, belts, coil pack, - by Porsche specialist.
In the last year it has had all new tyres, all new brake pads, new rear brake discs, new AOS, stainless steel exhaust back boxes and manifolds, AC lines, state of the art Kenwood 'CarPlay' head unit, and lots of other parts that were getting old and tired!
Massive history file of services, parts and history with old MOT's going back to 2008.
Not so good points, car classed as cat D in 2007, I was told by previous owner (manager at local Vauxhall dealership) this was due to vandalism, although I have no proof of this, of course!
Stitches coming undone on small section of drivers seat. New indicator stalks don't self cancel! Likely fitted wrong.
20 years old so paint... Read more
When I was looking 18 months ago, there was the odd 3.4 convertible at sub £10k - however they tended to have patchy/no service history. Sounds like the one you have found has been maintained.
The mantra seems to be buy on condition - which would be my approach here. As you can sink a lot of cash into a poor 996 (regardless of whether its a CatD).
Am not an expert on Cat D - but understand that you should assume it is worth 20% less than an equivalent Non-Cat Car. I think a non-catD car the same as the one you are considering would be a good deal at £10k. So £8k sounds good....
It sounds like it's been kept on top of and is a bargain. If it passes the usual used car checks and you like it, dive in and good luck. It will need something spending though, they all do.
I'd be checking electrical things. Does the roof work? Does it lock and unlock? Do the fans come on? Does the spoiler raise and lower? None of these are disasters at that money, but you'd need to be prepared to fix them or work around them.
Cat D is no problem, just inspect the car as thoroughly as you would any used car purchase.
As above it needs to be at least 20% cheaper than "similar" cars - i.e. ones with similar history and recent parts replacement and condition - not necessarily the cheapest alternative you can find.
You can assume this story is made up without any evidence.
Buyers of Cat D like to see evidence of what happened to the car and receipts for a quality repair. There are many charlatans around around that will say it was cat D for a scratch when in reality it was rebuilt on the chassis jig.
Without evidence I would price it more like 30% under an equivalent (so long as it passes your inspection), but bear in mind if its in good condition an equivalent might be £13-15k which would mean this is still a very good buy.
Do remember it will be harder to sell on when you are done with it and this is why it needs to be an attractive price.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.