fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

chip upgrade

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
11 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHchip upgrade

Leading reported evidence

Replace default values the system

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

It changes the default values the system uses for air fuel ect.

chip upgrade
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace default values the system' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace default values the system' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 11 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 4 other evidence results

Replace stuff

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

But hey, I'd like to feel better about the last $1,000+ I spent on changing stuff on my car too :beer: I'd suggest using a lot of caution before believing every chip tuning claim you hear.

chip upgrade

Run cars

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

After swapping the chips in, and running the cars on both chassis dynos and, I think, 1/4tr miles as well as fuel mileage test loops, the concluded 90% of all the chips at BEST did no worse the the OEM manufactures setup, and a substantial portion, i.e., MOST turned in worse results.

chip upgrade

Set limits

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

As I recall, something like only one (1) of the setups, Dinan's, actually made more horsepower, and that was attributed to the Dinan's willingness to bump the rev limiter 500rpm past the factory set limits.

chip upgrade

Use air fuel ect

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

It changes the default values the system uses for air fuel ect.

chip upgrade
Frequently discussed actions (7)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace default values the system

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

It changes the default values the system uses for air fuel ect.

chip upgrade

Replace stuff

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

But hey, I'd like to feel better about the last $1,000+ I spent on changing stuff on my car too :beer: I'd suggest using a lot of caution before believing every chip tuning claim you hear.

chip upgrade

Run cars

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

After swapping the chips in, and running the cars on both chassis dynos and, I think, 1/4tr miles as well as fuel mileage test loops, the concluded 90% of all the chips at BEST did no worse the the OEM manufactures setup, and a substantial portion, i.e., MOST turned in worse results.

chip upgrade

Set limits

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

As I recall, something like only one (1) of the setups, Dinan's, actually made more horsepower, and that was attributed to the Dinan's willingness to bump the rev limiter 500rpm past the factory set limits.

chip upgrade

Use air fuel ect

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

It changes the default values the system uses for air fuel ect.

chip upgrade

Use lot of caution

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

But hey, I'd like to feel better about the last $1,000+ I spent on changing stuff on my car too :beer: I'd suggest using a lot of caution before believing every chip tuning claim you hear.

chip upgrade

Use of this

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

You will not find a big boost of power unless the car can make use of this.

chip upgrade
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T013556Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

How many of you guys have had a chip upgrade done? Seems like the most logical course of action to get better performance at this time. :drivingskid:

POST 2Original post

It is certainly the easiest, but be careful. The one I was thinking of doing (I forget the ECU chip right now) voids the warranty. Do your research before you do something and make sure the chip upgrade doesn't void your warranty.

POST 3Original post

Color me skeptical. I can't find a copy of article any more, but I'm pretty sure there's got to be a copy floating about out there on the web. Quite some time ago (maybe too long ago to be relevant any longer), Car&Driver or Road& Track tried to do piece on the "benefits" of n/a (naturally aspirated) engine chip "tuning" As I recall they selected two vehicles for which there were a number tuning house "chips" on offer ~ a BMW 3 serries of some type, and the Chevy Corvette. After swapping the chips in, and running the cars on both chassis dynos and, I think, 1/4tr miles as well as fuel mileage test loops, the concluded 90% of all the chips at BEST did no worse the the OEM manufactures setup, and a substantial portion, i.e., MOST turned in worse results. As I recall, something like only one (1) of the setups, Dinan's, actually made more horsepower, and that was attributed to the Dinan's willingness to bump the rev limiter 500rpm past the factory set limits. Now with forced induction engines, i.e. superchargers or turbos, all bets are off. The tuners can easily offer substantially more power than what the factory engineers in consultation with the warranty and accounting departments will give you, mostly because they can simply shave more of the safety margin the manufacture insists on maintaining by limiting boost. Unless you've got mechanical modifications to your naturally aspirated motor to go along with a chip tuner's "chip" I'm very skeptical that you've done anything better than what the factory engineers have been able to accomplish with the 1,000 of hours and litterally millions of $$$ spent on doing the factory ECU setups in 99% of cars. But hey, I'd like to feel better about the last $1,000+ I spent on changing stuff on my car too :beer: I'd suggest using a lot of caution before believing every chip tuning claim you hear. Better yet do your own before/after dyno runs or 1/4tr mile times and report back to us with the results.

POST 4Original post

A chip as commonly known is really a reflash of the DME. It changes the default values the system uses for air fuel ect. The federal government mandates many things in testing to ensure emissions are going to pas in Alaska and the desert. You will not find a big boost of power unless the car can make use of this. I would go first with a desnork and cold air intake. This is a cheap way of getting a few HP. the evo one is great and an easy install. The next would be an exhaust, then a reputable chip. The only chip I know that works is the GIAC one that is remarketed by a few other names. These are also street recommendations as for the track or autocross alignments and pads are way more bang for the buck

POST 5Original post

THere are dyno charts on this site for various GIAC flashes and I think a couple of Revo ones as well. I know GIAC makes more power across the whole power band and considerably more torque down low.

POST 6Original post

i did custom chip... you know, it shift faster, but i really don't feel the difrence in hp... the guy who chip it said that maybe 10-15 hp is hard to be noticed...

POST 7Original post

Not necessarily. Piggybacks are common. See UNICHIP. FYI ... Authority has been chipping cars for a long time and claims 17 bhp for the CS

POST 8Original post

And Authority is offering $100 under their specials tab!!

POST 9Original post

And there is no way you will get a 17hp gain from either a program or a piggyback chip (piggyback chips usually arent done anymore after recent DME design changes as flashing is the better way to go). I'll bet you $100 you don't get 17hp gain.

POST 10Original post

I also know that the GIAC chip is only 995 and have seen there real world performance. while there HP claims are modest it is a definate differance but again without the proper breathing most chips are not living up to potential

POST 11Original post

My dealer is hosting our local PCA club's concours next month. Dealer will have a Revo guy there to flash our cars on a trial basis (free, for a few hours). Should be interesting. ==RedEye

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.