15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH6 Month Valuation Check - hits 7K
Leading reported evidence
Use same ip address
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Do you use the same IP address when you do the valuations :?:
Leading evidence: 'Use same ip address' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use same ip address' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T035758Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi All,
I've been collecting 6 month valuations from We Buy Any Car since I bought my 996 4 years ago - interesting fluctuations
2003 996 Tip - Full Porsche Service History
06 February 2015 104,500 £11,995.00
07 June 2015 107,000 £9,200.00
16 January 2016 109,000 £8,695.00
05 June 2016 110,000 £10,000.00
01 February 2017 113,000 £8,725.00
01 June 2017 115,000 £9,315.00
01 February 2018 117,000 £9,255.00
01 June 2018 118,000 £9,560.00
01 February 2019 120,000 £7,000.00
I have no intention of selling to WBAC - or selling at all - but its interesting to see how the price fluctuates..
Greg
Hi Swampy - do your quotes represent your current mileage or do you stick to a same mileage figure for every quote ?
The table looks to show a 10% ish depreciation per year +/- 15% depending on the season.
Mine has dropped 20%ish this year compared with last - maybe because I hit 120K miles?? or it recognises my IP Address??
I did a WBAC valuation on the turbo a few months ago and it was laughable. Just done it again (different IP) and its downright offensive!
Holy mother of god I can't believe what theyre offering now!
