fullymatted.
Back to search
PistonHeads

Just found out my GT2 was used in a Sunday Times spread - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
7 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHJust found out my GT2 was used in a Sunday Times spread - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK

Reported or suspected cause

opposite

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

I really can't imagine that now your GT2 is 12 years old it would dissuade a future purchaser - probably the opposite.

Original post Read captured discussion
Just found out my GT2 was used in a Sunday Times spread - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'opposite' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'opposite' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 7 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

opposite

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

I really can't imagine that now your GT2 is 12 years old it would dissuade a future purchaser - probably the opposite.

Original post Read captured discussion
Just found out my GT2 was used in a Sunday Times spread - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • PistonHeads: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T142254Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

http://p1international.com/sites/p1international.c... Just got the previous owners history from DVLA on the GT2... Dangers of tracing a cars history.....but it could be either good or bad I guess and have mixed feelings as it was the first GT2 in the P1 fleet between 2003-2004 - the P1 members took the mileage from 1,000 to 20,000 before P1 sold it on after about a year. But that was over 10 years ago and its in fine shape today and all original panels....so I should be grateful that Damon himself drove it and wrote that piece for the paper :-)

POST 2Original post

I wouldn't worry about the P1 link. It's not as if it was used on a trackday and thrashed by spotty oiks who's girlfriends bought them 5 laps in a Porker for £150. I think P1 was/is quite a well established supercar club and was quite costly to join. You' presume the members treated all the cars with respect.

POST 3Original post

Nice write up, I've a lot of time for DH, a thoroughly decent bloke, great champion & superb driver. It's a travesty that had circumstances of been different he could have been 3 times world champion..... As to your car, I wouldn't worry too much about it's early history after so long. It'll have been well looked after & who's to say a one owner example won't have been ragged from cold by one poor driver?!

POST 4Original post

Personally think that is a great bit of history to have associated with the car!

POST 5Original post

That's a cool find. I really can't imagine that now your GT2 is 12 years old it would dissuade a future purchaser - probably the opposite.

POST 6Original post

According to another thread that's running hot, your biggest problem is that is has a turbocharged engine. That probably why P1 sold it on.

POST 7Original post

Really? Ha ha...unfortunately there's no censor on BS Damon seems to have quite enjoyed it. For me, the GT2 is without question the best car I've ever owned.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.