10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHLowering springs, camber ?
Leading reported evidence
Run 2.25
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Run 2.25' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust revealed' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
(Full geo.and adjust revealed after a bedding in period)
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Well I think one of the main mistakes people do is that they do not have a proper Geo check after suspension changes.
Recommend centres is centre gravity so you should be aiming
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
One of the most recommended centres is centre gravity so you should be aiming to be using someone like them after any work
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
One of the most recommended centres is centre gravity so you should be aiming to be using someone like them after any work
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T100758Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi
I have noticed that a few people have issues with the rear camber being out of adjustment when the car has been lowered
How is this resolved ? do you need a camber kit ? or bolts with larger eccentrics ??
any info appreciated :thumb:
I think you should be able to get enough adjustment with the standard eccentric bolts. There is only one size of eccentric for standard, M030 and X74 (-10mm and -30mm).
Well I think one of the main mistakes people do is that they do not have a proper Geo check after suspension changes. One of the most recommended centres is centre gravity so you should be aiming to be using someone like them after any work
Theo
many thanks for the feedback :thumb:
http://forums.rennlist.com/rennforu...ed-h-and-r-sport-springs-how-to-included.html
i read the thread above aswell as others, also my brother had his lowered and a geo set up at demon tweeks and they said they could not get the rear in spec
thanks for the recommendation, i will try center of gravity :thumbs:
cheers adey, i'm having h&r springs fitted next week and was getting concerned the rear would wear the inside of the tyres and look like a triumph spitfire :sad:
Ah Spitfire
Brings back memories of my beloved mk 111
I wish I had it in a time capsule somewhere.
Please note the bedding in period this was advise from my trusted indie
3 weeks went by before the reset.
You're going to love the look and new horizons a very different world down there even though it's only 30mm
+1 for Center Gravity and, as Richard mentions, the rear has loads of adjustment in the rear even when significantly lowered. I'm running -2.25 on the rear and lowered 30mm.
The front is a different story, you'll need to either get GT3 lower control arms or adjustable top mounts to get more than about -1 Degree camber.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
