12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNaughty?
Leading reported evidence
Replace aren't they meant
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Although the ceramic discs are expensive to replace, aren't they meant to last
Leading evidence: 'Replace aren't they meant' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace aren't they meant' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
And given the cost of replacing ceramic discs .........
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T191851Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I am assuming you are referring to the fact that its a 2003 '53' plate but the Turbo S only came out in 2005? So it is being misdescribed! Maybe trying to say that with X50 its a bit like the S .....but still 39bhp lacking?
Otherwise, looks a lovely spec car in great condition.
Well spotted Chris. I also thought Turbo S cars had different coloured alloys (a dark silver finish) and ceramic brakes as standard. I think there should be 'Turbo S' logos scattered around the dials/ centre console too? The 'S' badge looks stuck on.
~ Maxie :?:
Naughty with regard to sticking the S badge on the back. Turbo S cars came out in 2005. I hate it when people make out their car is something it isn't.
I guess he could refer to it being a Turbo S due to the Tiptronic S transmission, I have seen a few people do that with their ads but really, it should be referred to as a Turbo Tip.
+1 definately stuck on.... he hasn't bothered to remove the turbo first and respace it so it's all central...
He might as well advertise it as an Enzo..!!! lol!!!
owner can't spell Porsche either! :hand:
Maybe thats what it is, its a Porche Turbo S but if it was in Porsche terms its just a Turbo. :floor:
As you say beautiful looking car as well. Don't know why you would want to do that. :dont know:
As I understand it a Turbo s is really only an x 50 with ceramic brakes and a few superficial cosmetic touches. And given the cost of replacing ceramic discs .........