50 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH718 Spyder v GT4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Use 718 2.0
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Had used a 718 2.0 for 6 years before all around Europe each year.
718 Spyder v GT4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Use 718 2.0' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test drive' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Used ones are a good 18/20 k over list which takes it above my budget.
718 Spyder v GT4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Test drive
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
718 Spyder v GT4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Test drive (very important)
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Summary: Drive them both if you can, proper test drive (very important).
718 Spyder v GT4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Test drive in both, ideally back
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
As ever, I suggest getting a decent test drive in both, ideally back to back.
718 Spyder v GT4 - Page 3 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
50 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T203514Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
A friend has just got his long-awaited GT4, and although not yet run-in, very generously let me drive it extensively over the weekend.
Apart from the heavy clutch, I really enjoyed it, especially the sense of structural rigidity, and it is definitely some way further along the “sports car” spectrum, than my E92 M3.
So…very tempted..
I am however somewhat besotted with the style of the Spyder.
So, my question - how does the driving experience compare? Does the Spyder have the same feeling of integrity? Are the spring/damper rates the same?
(I hate even the slightest rattles or trim squeaks…)
Thanks in advance!
I don’t have extensive time in both, but I did buy a 718 Spyder a couple of weeks ago (whilst looking at GT4s also) and still have a GT3.
In reverse order, fit and finish is great in the Spyder. I don’t see it being any different to the GT4. However the wind noise and ambient noise from the outdoors is naturally greater so you’re less likely to notice. To my knowledge the underpinnings of engine, gearbox and suspension are identical. I’m not 100% on spring rates given some weight difference, but they are near as damn it the same. They share a user manual as I discovered at the weekend.
The bigger issue, at least to me, was what did I want to use the car for. I wanted a soft top and I wanted something comfortable for regular use that the wife/kids would be happy in. I also didn’t want another car that looked like a mini race car with wings etc. The Spyder did all of this, but still had the same underpinnings as the GT4 thus making it a proper sports car. If I’d wanted a car more for trackdays, Sunday blasts and I wasn’t worried about family etc then the GT4 would have been the option of choice.
This might sound odd, but I think of the Spyder as a car to drive whilst wearing sunglasses and the GT3/4 as suited to a crash helmet. Of course one doesn’t do either of those all the time, but it’s the mental image and use case that each conjures for me.
As ever, I suggest getting a decent test drive in both, ideally back to back. Sounds like you’ve got a good view on the GT4, so maybe a trip to an OPC along with your mate in his GT4!
I've got a Spyder, but not driven a GT4 - however I would echo the post above. In my mind, if I was wanting a GT4 I'd be looking for one with PDK, buckets and ceramic brakes; just feels that kind of car to me, and I'm a diehard manual fan.
I'm happy with my Spyder with comfort seats, manual and steel brakes. As much as it's brilliant to drive quickly, there are plenty of times you just want to mooch along enjoying the roof down - and manual box/comfort seats suits that well. If I had a GT4 I'd be wanting to drive it flat out everywhere, but that's probably just me.
I also dislike wings on cars these days, the Spyder is subtly aggressive without the rear wing and looks so good with the roof down
Having had one, the secret with the Spyder is to treat it as a car to have the roof down permanently, and only put it up when you're out and parked up somewhere for example. Keep it at home in a garage and leave the roof down the rest of the time.
Mine was always outside, so it very quickly became such an issue fannying about with the roof that it started to annoy me. I was able to drop it in 15 seconds, but nonetheless it made it less enjoyable.
Overall, fabulous car though.
Jefferson Steelflex said:
Having had one, the secret with the Spyder is to treat it as a car to have the roof down permanently, and only put it up when you're out and parked up somewhere for example. Keep it at home in a garage and leave the roof down the rest of the time.
Mine was always outside, so it very quickly became such an issue fannying about with the roof that it started to annoy me. I was able to drop it in 15 seconds, but nonetheless it made it less enjoyable.
Overall, fabulous car though.
Agree with this. I probably use it less than I would a GT4 as it needs to be a roof-down day for me to take it out - it suits being part of a small fleet, rather than your only weekend toy IMO.
I enjoy having it, and it's nice to have the choice
I have owned both in manual, but now don't own either, so my honest points:-
Spyder Positives
Roof down motoring, on the right this can be amazing.
No rear spoiler, sometimes felt the GT4 can look a bit max power.
Better looking motor, the shape of the Spyder is amazing to my eyes
Spyder Negatives
Don't believe the hype the roof really is a faff, it becomes a pain and sometimes you can't be arsed with get it down. Especially on longer trips.
GT4 is more practical as rear boot on Spyder can only be open when roof is down.
Due to a very thin roof the Spyder is louder inside and not always in a good way. You hear more rattles because of this. The roof is nothing like that in a regular Boxster.
I do like a convertible, but if I was buy again for me it would be a GT4.
Both great cars, both are two of the best drivers cars you can buy.
Edited by diffstar on Tuesday 2nd August 14:39
I am on my second 718 Spyder and have had a 981 GT4. I have also done a few miles in a 718 GT4.
My first Spyder I specified as if it was a drop top GT4, because that’s what I thought it was. Buckets, Cup2’s, manual etc etc. I was quite disappointed with its on track performance, perfectly acceptable to a point but not as well resolved as a GT4 and not as precise. Porsche clearly don’t expect you to use it on track as the tyre pressure monitoring system does not have the track setting as per the GT4 which is a PITA as you need to start the Cup2’s quite low which sets off the alarms, it does not do this in a GT4 track setting.
The second one I specified as a dedicated road car, so comfy seats, sports tyres, PDK, ceramics etc etc. This car is a much nicer car, a gorgeous convertible with a firm edge, lovely. They were both very well screwed together, very solid nothing fell off and no rattles, the benefit of an old well developed platform.
As far as useability goes I am up to 7000miles since February in my current Spyder and I love every minute of it. This car has a lot less wind noise than the first one with the hood up so either it’s just luck of the draw or Porsche have got better at screwing them together. Saying that I drive virtually everywhere with the hood down unless it’s absolutely chucking it down with rain. More often than not I park it up with the hood down as well. It is garaged when at home so the hood stays down then as well. With the hood down it’s lovely up to about 80MPH after which it starts to get a bit breezy. Up to 60 or so it’s probably quieter than a GT4 as well. I have the Burmester system in mine (not an option on a GT4 AFAIK) which is brilliant especially at speed. I listen to music or podcasts in mine and it’s fine at all UK speeds with the hood down. The GT4 was dire even with the Bose that I had in mine.
Rear boot access is a breeze with the hood down but as others have said a PITA with the hood up. I have parked up at a hotel in the pissing rain with Mrs BigM in the car and had to release the hood to get her case out of the boot, that went down well
you just get used to a bit of forward planning with the packing.
My take on it is that the Spyder is a superb car, one of the nicest in the current range, but it’s not a drop top Porsche GT car.
If you think the 718 GT4 clutch is heavy drive a 981 GT4 or 981 Spyder they are far heavier and perfectly weighted for a Porsche GT imo as the 718 clutches are too light as are all Porsche manuals since the 991.2 Gt3 which is also too light.
Structural integrity of the Spyder is virtually identical to the GT4 but very slight scuttle shake if barely noticeable but the car is noisier overall.
I would go GT4 think it looks better with the small rear wing but the Spyder is a great looking car cheaper new than the Gt4 too (bizarrely) and rarer too.
bigmowley said:
I am on my second 718 Spyder and have had a 981 GT4. I have also done a few miles in a 718 GT4.
My first Spyder I specified as if it was a drop top GT4, because that’s what I thought it was. Buckets, Cup2’s, manual etc etc. I was quite disappointed with its on track performance, perfectly acceptable to a point but not as well resolved as a GT4 and not as precise. Porsche clearly don’t expect you to use it on track as the tyre pressure monitoring system does not have the track setting as per the GT4 which is a PITA as you need to start the Cup2’s quite low which sets off the alarms, it does not do this in a GT4 track setting.
The second one I specified as a dedicated road car, so comfy seats, sports tyres, PDK, ceramics etc etc. This car is a much nicer car, a gorgeous convertible with a firm edge, lovely. They were both very well screwed together, very solid nothing fell off and no rattles, the benefit of an old well developed platform.
As far as useability goes I am up to 7000miles since February in my current Spyder and I love every minute of it. This car has a lot less wind noise than the first one with the hood up so either it’s just luck of the draw or Porsche have got better at screwing them together. Saying that I drive virtually everywhere with the hood down unless it’s absolutely chucking it down with rain. More often than not I park it up with the hood down as well. It is garaged when at home so the hood stays down then as well. With the hood down it’s lovely up to about 80MPH after which it starts to get a bit breezy. Up to 60 or so it’s probably quieter than a GT4 as well. I have the Burmester system in mine (not an option on a GT4 AFAIK) which is brilliant especially at speed. I listen to music or podcasts in mine and it’s fine at all UK speeds with the hood down. The GT4 was dire even with the Bose that I had in mine.
Rear boot access is a breeze with the hood down but as others have said a PITA with the hood up. I have parked up at a hotel in the pissing rain with Mrs BigM in the car and had to release the hood to get her case out of the boot, that went down well
you just get used to a bit of forward planning with the packing.
My take on it is that the Spyder is a superb car, one of the nicest in the current range, but it’s not a drop top Porsche GT car.
Yes i found that out on track as well. The track mode isn't there.
You are correct that it is not a track car just competent road car and it does that bit well.
I love it on PCCB and with PDK. I prefer the buckets just for the looks.
and whilst the top is down, i dun need no stereo
It will do the odd track day but it definitely isn't a track day car.
av185 said:
If you think the 718 GT4 clutch is heavy drive a 981 GT4 or 981 Spyder they are far heavier and perfectly weighted for a Porsche GT imo as the 718 clutches are too light as are all Porsche manuals since the 991.2 Gt3 which is also too light.
Structural integrity of the Spyder is virtually identical to the GT4 but very slight scuttle shake if barely noticeable but the car is noisier overall.
I would go GT4 think it looks better with the small rear wing but the Spyder is a great looking car cheaper new than the Gt4 too (bizarrely) and rarer too.
Your comment on clutch weight is interesting, as I have driven a 981 Spyder - admittedly 5 years ago - which did not feel particularly heavy. So maybe my friend's GT4 needs some time to loosen-up a bit?
Thanks everybody for interesting and obviously thoughtful perspectives.
There is definitely some point to the question - what do I expect to use it for?
Highly unlikely that I would ever take one or the other on track, so a lean towards the Spyder is reasonable, so long as the on-road experience is not compromised. Pure fun/weekend/European trips are its target, as I have other wheels for the mundane stuff. Justifying keeping the M3 would be difficult, as Mrs Wife would see the GT4 as too similar to the M3, whereas the Spyder would be completely different to her. Selling the M3 would be a wrench, too.
However, the Spyder roof complication is relevant as currently I would not be able to garage the car (a house move might sort that out). I know I should not worry about what others think of someone my age driving a convertible, but the more hard-core image of the GT4 tends to negate that.
I really do need to try a Spyder on road, but that might be almost as difficult as getting a build slot now.....!
What on earth does age have to do with driving a convertible? I’m 60 and love mine to bits but my kids drive it too and love it. My 3 year old Grandson loves it too. Genuinely interested
bigmowley said:
What on earth does age have to do with driving a convertible? I’m 60 and love mine to bits but my kids drive it too and love it. My 3 year old Grandson loves it too. Genuinely interested
Logically, nothing at all.
But it does tend to attract snarky "mid-life crisis" comment from some people - who are probably motivated by jealousy...
77 and drive a Spyder 987 and a 981 have had convertibles for years
The negative on the 981 and 718 you cant access the boot without detaching the roof flyers first . so if clothes are in the boot and its raining you are going to get wet retrieving them
Edited by woodysnr on Wednesday 3rd August 22:42
I think you’ll be ok getting a test drive. I managed three in two days, albeit there was some reticence at first until they’d figured I was a credible buyer. If I was charitable I’d say they must get a lot of chancers and test pilots; if I wasn’t being charitable I’d say it was a bit like hard work and they need to work on some customer service! Call ahead, give it some chat to demonstrate you’re a real buyer, rocking-up in a nice car etc etc and should be fine (all a bit painful I know).
woodysnr said:
77 and drive a Spyder 987 and a 981 have had convertibles for years
The negative on the 981 and 718 you cant access the boot without detaching the roof flyers first . so if clothes are in the boot and its raining you are going to get wet retrieving them
Edited by woodysnr on Wednesday 3rd August 22:42
That restriction is not quite as bad as I thought it would be - I could live with that!
I was lucky to get a 718 Spyder in 2019 which I had for a year which I loved. For various reasons I had to sell this having done several EU trips and the odd few trackdays. The car was faultless and a great privilege to have had. In 2021 I had a GT4 PDK which was bought as a track day car with this use in mind (I couldn't imaging a better car for me). Its definitely better much than the Spyder on track which felt soft in comparison. However during this time I began to miss the Spyder and I was lucky enough to get another allocation for a PDK Spyder. Its an awesome car and I can't see myself letting this go. I've done many trips in this too and 5 trackdays, including Zandvoort and SPA. Not as fast as the GT4, but equally as fun. It noe has a JCR silenced exhaust which completes the 'ticks most boxes' car for me. Good luck..
718 Spyder
For: Engine surprisingly good on road and track, but not like a GT3. Lovely gear change. Steering seems much improved over 981 for feel and weight. Convertible top not difficult to use (reference 987 Spyder). Top down driving, great on road, it really flows. Surprisingly good on track when set up by Centre of Gravity (however not primarily for track work, no harnesses, difficult to source track parts since can't use many GT4 parts, lacks several GT4 track options and GT4 aero).
Against: More noise than many convertibles. Standard Boxster roof effortless to use, better in every way, except looks. Top down limits use of Hi Fi (engine sound nice alternative on B-roads). Access to rear trunk limited. Gear ratios, same for GT4 (not a fan of PDK, but would help in this area, plus faster on track).
718 GT4
For: Better track car, equipped for track (especially CS option). On road as per Spyder, seems a little firmer. Quieter, but still noisy for a coupe.
Against: Rear view (most cars with decent aero). Not a GT3, but great for the price and less unobtainable (hate paying over for a spec I didn't want). Not a convertible.
Summary: Drive them both if you can, proper test drive (very important). Regular track use GT4, open top driving important Spyder. Mixed use Spyder worth the slight extra effort for open air option (my choice, did I mention the looks and the way it drives).
So is the consensus that the Spyder is slightly softer sprung than the GT4?
When I drove the GT4 last week it did seem pretty firm at low speeds, but the chassis appeared to do a remarkably good job at smoothing out the roughness/undulations as speeds increased.
If the Spyder is slightly softer, I would not object, and I am extremely unlikely to take either on track.
In my opinion, the best car that Porsche makes for your intended use is a Boxster GTS 4.0. It has all the real-world performance (and sound) of the Spyder with a slightly better ride and significantly better practicality. And it's cheaper and probably easier to obtain.
It will still feel completely different to your E92 M3.
If you aren't too bothered about 'owning the Top Trump', a GTS in an understated spec will allow you to fly under the radar and please both yourself and your wife.
I have a Cayman GTS 4.0 and an E90 M3 (and a GR Yaris). They make an excellent pair (trio). I used to have a 981 GT4 and I have no regrets whatsoever about moving to the GTS.
Nice position to be in, whatever you decide!
Stunters said:
In my opinion, the best car that Porsche makes for your intended use is a Boxster GTS 4.0. It has all the real-world performance (and sound) of the Spyder with a slightly better ride and significantly better practicality. And it's cheaper and probably easier to obtain.
It will still feel completely different to your E92 M3.
If you aren't too bothered about 'owning the Top Trump', a GTS in an understated spec will allow you to fly under the radar and please both yourself and your wife.
I have a Cayman GTS 4.0 and an E90 M3 (and a GR Yaris). They make an excellent pair (trio). I used to have a 981 GT4 and I have no regrets whatsoever about moving to the GTS.
Nice position to be in, whatever you decide!
Yep. I wanted a Spyder but didn't want to be arsed with the roof and speed bump unfriendly front suspension. Bought a Boxster 4.0 GTS and love it. Sublime car.
Stunters said:
In my opinion, the best car that Porsche makes for your intended use is a Boxster GTS 4.0. It has all the real-world performance (and sound) of the Spyder with a slightly better ride and significantly better practicality. And it's cheaper and probably easier to obtain.
It will still feel completely different to your E92 M3.
If you aren't too bothered about 'owning the Top Trump', a GTS in an understated spec will allow you to fly under the radar and please both yourself and your wife.
I have a Cayman GTS 4.0 and an E90 M3 (and a GR Yaris). They make an excellent pair (trio). I used to have a 981 GT4 and I have no regrets whatsoever about moving to the GTS.
Nice position to be in, whatever you decide!
Very interesting perspective, especially the Wife-friendly part!
Cheaper/easier to get/better ride/more practical/nearly as powerful - all highly relevant things to consider.
I just wish the Spyder did not look so gorgeous!
Tony B2 said:
Stunters said:
In my opinion, the best car that Porsche makes for your intended use is a Boxster GTS 4.0. It has all the real-world performance (and sound) of the Spyder with a slightly better ride and significantly better practicality. And it's cheaper and probably easier to obtain.
It will still feel completely different to your E92 M3.
If you aren't too bothered about 'owning the Top Trump', a GTS in an understated spec will allow you to fly under the radar and please both yourself and your wife.
I have a Cayman GTS 4.0 and an E90 M3 (and a GR Yaris). They make an excellent pair (trio). I used to have a 981 GT4 and I have no regrets whatsoever about moving to the GTS.
Nice position to be in, whatever you decide!
Very interesting perspective, especially the Wife-friendly part!
Cheaper/easier to get/better ride/more practical/nearly as powerful - all highly relevant things to consider.
I just wish the Spyder did not look so gorgeous!
Yup you have nailed it in one.
I ordered a "wife friendly" Boxster 25 whilst I was waiting forever for my current Spyder. It duly arrived, I took one look at it in the showroom hated it and sold it straight back to the OPC. I never even sat in it or had it registered.
Very very happy with that decision.
The issue with the Boxster 25 is that the colour choices and wheel specs are very limited. Some people will love them, some people won't like how they look.
The above picture is my own Cayman GTS 4.0. I think it's a lovely subtle spec (of course I would) and it's exactly what I wanted for the car.
It would really suit a Boxster GTS in my opinion.
Another excellent relatively subtle colour for the GTS would be Aventurine Green. Or you could spec one in (say) Python Green or Racing Yellow if you wanted not to fly under the radar.
There are some good pictures of PHers' cars in the GTS 4.0 threads.
bigmowley said:
Yup you have nailed it in one.
I ordered a "wife friendly" Boxster 25 whilst I was waiting forever for my current Spyder. It duly arrived, I took one look at it in the showroom hated it and sold it straight back to the OPC. I never even sat in it or had it registered.
Very very happy with that decision.
Wow really? what was it about it you disliked so much to instantly give it up?
julian987R said:
bigmowley said:
Yup you have nailed it in one.
I ordered a "wife friendly" Boxster 25 whilst I was waiting forever for my current Spyder. It duly arrived, I took one look at it in the showroom hated it and sold it straight back to the OPC. I never even sat in it or had it registered.
Very very happy with that decision.
Wow really? what was it about it you disliked so much to instantly give it up?
Probably picked the wrong colour, black with red interior. It was hood down when I walked up to it and the bit where the hood folds down into just looked awful like it wasn’t finished, like there was something missing, untidy. Compared to the Spyder it was just an instant no. I just waited for another few months. I would never have been happy so what’s the point.
bigmowley said:
julian987R said:
bigmowley said:
Yup you have nailed it in one.
I ordered a "wife friendly" Boxster 25 whilst I was waiting forever for my current Spyder. It duly arrived, I took one look at it in the showroom hated it and sold it straight back to the OPC. I never even sat in it or had it registered.
Very very happy with that decision.
Wow really? what was it about it you disliked so much to instantly give it up?
Probably picked the wrong colour, black with red interior. It was hood down when I walked up to it and the bit where the hood folds down into just looked awful like it wasn’t finished, like there was something missing, untidy. Compared to the Spyder it was just an instant no. I just waited for another few months. I would never have been happy so what’s the point.
incredible. though as you say if you knew you'd never be happy then whats the point. I bet the salesperson was floored huh.
Tony B2 said:
Stunters said:
In my opinion, the best car that Porsche makes for your intended use is a Boxster GTS 4.0. It has all the real-world performance (and sound) of the Spyder with a slightly better ride and significantly better practicality. And it's cheaper and probably easier to obtain.
It will still feel completely different to your E92 M3.
If you aren't too bothered about 'owning the Top Trump', a GTS in an understated spec will allow you to fly under the radar and please both yourself and your wife.
I have a Cayman GTS 4.0 and an E90 M3 (and a GR Yaris). They make an excellent pair (trio). I used to have a 981 GT4 and I have no regrets whatsoever about moving to the GTS.
Nice position to be in, whatever you decide!
Very interesting perspective, especially the Wife-friendly part!
Cheaper/easier to get/better ride/more practical/nearly as powerful - all highly relevant things to consider.
I just wish the Spyder did not look so gorgeous!
Cheaper, maybe spec for spec but there’s a lot of overlap depending on what options.
Easier to get, slightly but still difficult new and pricey nearly new.
Better ride, yes, especially with the -10mm option
More practical, oh yes, it’s not just it’s a power top but the spyder top is a phaff and much noisier.
Power, I would bet 99.99% of drivers wouldn’t be able to tell the difference between the engines if swapped.
I was seriously considering a spyder but ultimately the hood and availability put me off. Obviously if you are taking residuals into account the spyder will hold its value better.
Would have loved a Boxster 25 brand new but didn't get one typical Porsche don't make enough for the genuine enthusiasts only the chosen few as always.
Used ones are a good 18/20 k over list which takes it above my budget.
Granted not a great choice of colours probably plumped for White.
So will stick with wifes GTS
Greedydog said:
Tony B2 said:
Stunters said:
In my opinion, the best car that Porsche makes for your intended use is a Boxster GTS 4.0. It has all the real-world performance (and sound) of the Spyder with a slightly better ride and significantly better practicality. And it's cheaper and probably easier to obtain.
It will still feel completely different to your E92 M3.
If you aren't too bothered about 'owning the Top Trump', a GTS in an understated spec will allow you to fly under the radar and please both yourself and your wife.
I have a Cayman GTS 4.0 and an E90 M3 (and a GR Yaris). They make an excellent pair (trio). I used to have a 981 GT4 and I have no regrets whatsoever about moving to the GTS.
Nice position to be in, whatever you decide!
Very interesting perspective, especially the Wife-friendly part!
Cheaper/easier to get/better ride/more practical/nearly as powerful - all highly relevant things to consider.
I just wish the Spyder did not look so gorgeous!
Cheaper, maybe spec for spec but there’s a lot of overlap depending on what options.
Easier to get, slightly but still difficult new and pricey nearly new.
Better ride, yes, especially with the -10mm option
More practical, oh yes, it’s not just it’s a power top but the spyder top is a phaff and much noisier.
Power, I would bet 99.99% of drivers wouldn’t be able to tell the difference between the engines if swapped.
I was seriously considering a spyder but ultimately the hood and availability put me off. Obviously if you are taking residuals into account the spyder will hold its value better.
All well and good, however the key point is still: The Spyder is gorgeous the GTS is just a Boxster.
tracydeedance said:
Would have loved a Boxster 25 brand new but didn't get one typical Porsche don't make enough for the genuine enthusiasts only the chosen few as always.
Used ones are a good 18/20 k over list which takes it above my budget.
Granted not a great choice of colours probably plumped for White.
So will stick with wifes GTS
This might be true in some cases but I got a B25 allocation (1 of 2 that my OPC was allocated) and in the grand scheme of things I'm certain I'm far from being Porsche's best customer. While I think Porsche, like any business will want to keep their best customers happy, if my experience is anything to go by they also try to make sure that some "specials" go to "ordinary" customers as well.
Oh, and unlike many that buy "special" cars I bought mine with the intention of using it and have just completed 8K miles since taking delivery in October. 3K miles of that were enjoyed doing a road trip to the Italian Lakes which was possibly the best one we've ever done.
Gratuitous picture half way up the Stelvio
Voodoo Blue said:
tracydeedance said:
Would have loved a Boxster 25 brand new but didn't get one typical Porsche don't make enough for the genuine enthusiasts only the chosen few as always.
Used ones are a good 18/20 k over list which takes it above my budget.
Granted not a great choice of colours probably plumped for White.
So will stick with wifes GTS
This might be true in some cases but I got a B25 allocation (1 of 2 that my OPC was allocated) and in the grand scheme of things I'm certain I'm far from being Porsche's best customer. While I think Porsche, like any business will want to keep their best customers happy, if my experience is anything to go by they also try to make sure that some "specials" go to "ordinary" customers as well.
Oh, and unlike many that buy "special" cars I bought mine with the intention of using it and have just completed 8K miles since taking delivery in October. 3K miles of that were enjoyed doing a road trip to the Italian Lakes which was possibly the best one we've ever done.
Gratuitous picture half way up the Stelvio
Your one of the lucky ones all I can say after owning Porsches for 25 years bought at least half a dozen from OPC and a total of over 20 various models and always serviced at PCs.
My view is different I am afraid as in my post.
So called flipping really does bug me .
Enjoy your B25 great pic.
Not all bad still got a blinding GTS
Ps sorry for going off topic back to it no doubt .
Have fun.
Joscal said:
Which do you prefer PK? Is the ride identical out of interest?
The Spyder looks stunning.
Ours is the GT4, the Spyder was owned by my in-laws, but they’ve just sold it. Both great cars. Spyder sounds a bit louder, but rides, steers and puts power down in a similar fashion. Both manual. I prefer the look of the GT4, but Spyder rarer car. Both great imho.
First Sea Lord said:
PKZ4M said:
Both cars are great to drive and own, especially in yellow ;-)
Now that's just showing off.
In-laws copied us, after we bought the GT4. Their Spyder was sold back to dealer last month.
How weird. I came back from Italy (Rapallo coast) in my B25 in July. Same colour!! Had used a 718 2.0 for 6 years before all around Europe each year.
Really enjoying the B25 and getting a GT4 in October to pair. Specced that as a real track car - buckets, clubsport, pccb etc in Arctic Grey with gold wheels.....
Tony B2 said:
I really do need to try a Spyder on road, but that might be almost as difficult as getting a build slot now.....!
Dont think you have any chance of getting a new Spyder allocation now
I have a 981 GT4 and recently tried the new Spyder. Unfortunately I found it not as engaging, mainly down to the steering feel. Really surprised me TBH as I was expecting that part to be the same or better. It sounded ok to my ears (not as nice as the 981) but not that bad at all given the bad press around that. Clutch super light in comparison. Short of getting the RS (fat chance it seems) I can’t see me changing now and I thought the Spyder would be the perfect fit for my needs.
I also found my 981 (2016) steering lots better than my 718 which I was surprised about.
All I’d say now is that after a year I’ve mostly forgotten about it and work with what I’ve got.
I found that the steering feel is quite sensitive to geometry on my 718 Spyder. Especially turn in. The more track day based geometry improved things no end.
The 981 platform as the first EPAS platform is not well regarded for steering feel and most generally seem to rate the 718 platform more highly.
I haven’t got a 981 for comparison however I do have a 987 R which has far superior steering.
I guess it’s very much down to set up and personal preference.
That’s what I was expecting too, but it didn’t improve when I got a proper set up with adjustable toe arms and camber shims etc etc, still poorer steering than the 981… Maybe my 981 was just one in a million.
Obviously didn’t compare to the old air cooled cars I had, but you work with what you got.
bigmowley said:
The 981 platform as the first EPAS platform is not well regarded for steering feel and most generally seem to rate the 718 platform more highly.
Not sure where you are getting that info - have you driven both? Dan Prosser had much the same opinion
https://www.pistonheads.com/news/ph-features/porsc...
Anyhow we all have different preferences, but the newer 718 is definitely filtering out more noise in the steering. I noticed it in the first 50 yards driving.
bosshog said:
bigmowley said:
The 981 platform as the first EPAS platform is not well regarded for steering feel and most generally seem to rate the 718 platform more highly.
Not sure where you are getting that info - have you driven both? Dan Prosser had much the same opinion
https://www.pistonheads.com/news/ph-features/porsc...
Anyhow we all have different preferences, but the newer 718 is definitely filtering out more noise in the steering. I noticed it in the first 50 yards driving.
981GT4 followed by 718 Spyder. With a 987 CR owned throughout, which provides a handy benchmark. You are correct though, there isn’t that much difference between the EPAS cars especially compared to the step change to the CR. Neither of the later generations can hold a candle to the 987. I take back the 718 being better comment. Horses for courses and all that.
Having a 981 Cayman and a 718 Boxster in the household I'd say that the 718 definitely feels better than the 981 back to back. Some of that might be down to 19s on the 981 vs 20s on the 718.
I had the 981 round Thruxton for half a day a few weeks ago and it was great fun but it didn't feel as good as driving my 718 over the Alps a week before that.
I had a 718 Spyder, which I specced pretty sportingly (PDK, PCCBs, bucket seats), as it followed a 991.2 GT3. I hoped the Spyder would provide more accessible access to the high revving engine (I know it’s a different engine and 8k v 9k) and feeling of the GT3 (same front suspension) since you could take the roof off. While I don’t track my cars, I live in northern Scotland and have access to really nice roads (NC500 is on my doorstep and plenty other better roads), so I consider myself a ‘sporty’ driver. The Spyder was never cruised and once past its run in, it spent it’s life chasing the redline. I’ve since sold the Spyder and If i was to do it again, I would get a GT4 instead. In my part of the world and driving on the roads as I like to do, the wind noise drowned out the engine noise and really spoiled the experience. I ended up driving with the roof on, so I could better hear the engine (it worked), but that defeats the purpose of the Spyder. If you are looking for a convertible to drive around at sensible speeds or do road tips in sunny weather, then I think the Spyder would be brilliant, but it didn’t fit my particular bill.
Hope this helps.
Voodoo Blue said:
Having a 981 Cayman and a 718 Boxster in the household I'd say that the 718 definitely feels better than the 981 back to back. Some of that might be down to 19s on the 981 vs 20s on the 718.
I had the 981 round Thruxton for half a day a few weeks ago and it was great fun but it didn't feel as good as driving my 718 over the Alps a week before that.
I was referring to GT4 vs Spyder so comply different setup really. I think the 981 and 991.2 GTs are best steering feel for EPAS I have tried thus far out there. Lotus 410 for hydraulic, and Elise S1/2 for unassisted for me. I have read that Porsche intentionally filter out most lots of the feel back out of EPAs as the ‘mass market’ prefers it that way. It’s only on the specials they seem to dial it back in somewhat.
Anyhow sorry for thread drift.
Spyder is a lovely car and I would defo consider it if I didn’t have the 981 gt4
Over 6 years and 28k with 981 Spyder. I have found the engine roar is very aural and loud. I love it. Steering is the same imo the same as a 718 non gt car. Friends comment on engine is the loudest Porsche they have heard. Great on track and can really enjoy its limits with the roof down. Turned down a 718 Spyder due to option of folding buckets with heating was removed. 3C outside in feb with roof down going to Anglesey was a highlight plus a warm bum.
I did measure the front splitter height on 981 Spyder, 718 Spyder and gt3 991.2. 718 10mm higher and 981 991 same. Is that correct??
Hergiswilreid said:
I had a 718 Spyder, which I specced pretty sportingly (PDK, PCCBs, bucket seats), as it followed a 991.2 GT3. I hoped the Spyder would provide more accessible access to the high revving engine (I know it’s a different engine and 8k v 9k) and feeling of the GT3 (same front suspension) since you could take the roof off. While I don’t track my cars, I live in northern Scotland and have access to really nice roads (NC500 is on my doorstep and plenty other better roads), so I consider myself a ‘sporty’ driver. The Spyder was never cruised and once past its run in, it spent it’s life chasing the redline. I’ve since sold the Spyder and If i was to do it again, I would get a GT4 instead. In my part of the world and driving on the roads as I like to do, the wind noise drowned out the engine noise and really spoiled the experience. I ended up driving with the roof on, so I could better hear the engine (it worked), but that defeats the purpose of the Spyder. If you are looking for a convertible to drive around at sensible speeds or do road tips in sunny weather, then I think the Spyder would be brilliant, but it didn’t fit my particular bill.
Hope this helps.
It does - thank you!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.