6 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHVideo/sound of designkit cold air intake kit
Leading reported evidence
Install designkit cold air intake kit plus designkit filter
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Fitted Designkit cold air intake kit plus designkit filter.
Leading evidence: 'Install designkit cold air intake kit plus designkit filter' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean paper filter is just as good' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Bear in mind this is pretty marginal as a nice clean new paper filter is just as good.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
This replaces the existing Y shaped tube with a smoother straight intake into the airbox bypassing the Helmhotz airbox muffler.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T064914Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Fitted Designkit cold air intake kit plus designkit filter. This replaces the existing Y shaped tube with a smoother straight intake into the airbox bypassing the Helmhotz airbox muffler. Claimed to offer deeper induction noise at above 4000 rpm and 10bhp. Very easy to fit. My YouTube clip has standard system in 3rd gear accelerating above 3000rpm. The rest is with kit fitted. Sound maybe not so clear with iPhone but maybe slightly deeper intake/exhaust noise. Not sure about more power but definitely more crisper throttle. A suprising benefit is an extra 1-2 mpg. At a steady 80 mph was getting 28 mph now 30 mph. Might go for a Hayward& Scott bypass next time
to see the YouTube clip click on
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klAGvYnxmcE&feature=youtube_gdata
Not sure on the 10 BHP. :?:
It took Porsche £8,750 to add 20-25 BHP (ok that includes lubrication and cooling upgrades, but even so ... )
Not knocking it, I have the Schnell CAI + K&N filter + Helmholtz resonator chamber deletion on mine.
I agree. Some claims for horse-power increases seem scarcely believable. I had mine dynoed 3 months ago giving 317 bhp and 250 lb/ft torque, totally standard. Might give it a go again after this minor change. Do you think it made any difference for you with your CAI and free flow filter ?
The midrange response seems crisper, but that, if real, is probably down to freer breathing during the first instant of opening the throttle.
This does not mean total (maximum) bhp has increased, just fattened curve. Although, max revs should show benefits from free flow aswell (via panel filter and smoothed tube/venturi de-resonance)
Bear in mind this is pretty marginal as a nice clean new paper filter is just as good.
I had my car SuperChipped and it charts a "17 BHP" power uplift.
However, again, this is just intra range fattening. Max power is only up something like 6-9 BHP.
So I can't see a new rubber tube being more effective than more and better timed fueling / ignition.