3 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWrong tracker installation
Reported or suspected cause
talking
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause · Original poster
One problem is talking to someone with authority, getting through the receptionis (almost as bad as my doctors secretary!!) is nigh on impossible!
Leading evidence: 'talking' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'talking' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check with tracker yesterday and they agreed it was wrong' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Check with tracker yesterday and they agreed it was wrong
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Apparently this should be the other way round, I checked with Tracker yesterday and they agreed it was wrong for 2 reasons:
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Me again!
Just wondering, has anyone else had a tracker fitted by Porsche? My (54 plate) was fitted at the supplying OPC (nameless unless the fix it!) and they have done it arse about face.
I popped in to a Hi-Fi place for an Ipod connecter thingy and they spotted it clear as day. The box, transponder (which is meant to be in the wing) is in the front boot hidden only by the platstic liner and the aerial is in the wing shrouded in metal! Apparently this should be the other way round, I checked with Tracker yesterday and they agreed it was wrong for 2 reasons:
1. The transponder can be easily ripped out and tossed in to the nearest bin
2. The Aerial will have a very weak signal baecause its shrouded in metal.
Last thing I need is for it be nicked and the
insurance
company void the policy because the tracker is incorrectly installed!!
Anyone else had this problem? Tracker are saying it £130 to re-fit correctly, I think that as the OPC didn't install correctly in the first place it should be up to them to rectify. Am I right or being unreasonable? :dont know:
Cheers Ben
If you can get this in writing from Tracker and then take it back to the OPC and challenge them then you have a case imo. If you can also get something in writing from the Hi Fi place then you are in an even stronger position. In my experience though, it may be best if you type out the letters and just ask the companies concerned to print them out on their headed paper as they may not have the time to write the letters themselves.
Good luck with this.
~ Maxie
Cheers Maxie
I will let you know what happens, spoke to the OPC yesterday. The guy I spoke to was a salesman who was very helpful but initally said no to a re-installation and then told me to email everything in (think this was just to appease me) and he wuld see what he can do but am not hopeful.
One problem is talking to someone with authority, getting through the receptionis (almost as bad as my doctors secretary!!) is nigh on impossible!
Tracker on the other hand have been excellent, can't fault them!
lets see what happens!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
