Planet-9

Missed It By That Much Chief!

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

5 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHMissed It By That Much Chief!

Leading reported evidence

Run off area is where one goes nuts

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
The track or a big empty lot with run off area is where one goes nuts...
Original post Read captured discussion
Missed It By That Much Chief!

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run off area is where one goes nuts' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run off area is where one goes nuts' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 5 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run off area is where one goes nuts

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
The track or a big empty lot with run off area is where one goes nuts...
Original post Read captured discussion
Missed It By That Much Chief!

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

Just saw this, he almost catches it to get away with perhaps only flat spotted tires but then.... Be careful out there everyone. I bet he was racing that white car. It'll buff out....

POST 2Original post

A$$holes like that give us all a bad name. Slow down on congested public roads for Christ sake.

POST 3Original post

Almost like the driver tried their hardest to overcome the tcs. Slip under power turning left towards the center divider, then close down the throttle and flick to the right. Also.. don't let the car roll out in to a barrier, in a spinny both feet inny. I mean all that said besides the obvious criminal negligence of swerving through baby boys and old ladies.. The track or a big empty lot with run off area is where one goes nuts... wow.

POST 4Original post

The approach angle as he enters the frame is strange to my eye. Also, it doesn't look like he's slowing down as he enters the frame which is odd due to what's in front of him. Lastly, I was wondering if an insurance company knew it was 100% you and someone sends the video wouldn't you think collecting on collision is a no go?

POST 5Original post

Yeah this is just, wow. Around 0.0500 appears the rear gets even more unweighted than it was. Driver panic stabs the brakes or TCS thinks the car is in a left hand sweeper. Or both. Hard to tell at 240p what the steering or brake lights are doing. Either way no bueno becuase it gets even more wrong way angle.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.