26 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWelcome to the New Site
Leading reported evidence
Replace from what appeared
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The time stamp on a post has changed from what appeared to be central time to what now looks like pacific time.
Leading evidence: 'Replace from what appeared' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace from what appeared' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Please let me know of any other issues you run into.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Is it possible for us to set the time shown on our pc's locally?.I would like it set to GMT.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
26 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Planet-9: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T165820Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
If you are reading this message you are in the RIGHT place, the NEW site. Let me know how performance is for you please, it SHOULD be much better! There will be a few kinks to work out since I'm waiting on the DNS to propogate with this new IP address so that planet-9.com will resolve correctly, and email from the site still needs to be activated. Please let me know of any other issues you run into.
Thanks!
Noticeably faster, thanks. I used to open multiple windows, so I could read while others were loading. I don't have to do that anymore. I get the error message too though. Something about no relay...
Edited by - chrismillion on 12/17/2005 5:33:58 PM
If you see an error message like:
There was an error = The server rejected one or more recipient addresses. The server response was: 550 5.7.1 ... Relaying denied. IP name possibly forged [66.116.109.230]
It is because someone has subscribed to the thread and the website is trying to send out email but cannot do so until I get the email properly configured. I probably won't have that taken care of until Monday because I have to wait on a 3rd party.
Glad to hear the site is much faster for everyone!
The time stamp on a post used to show up 1 hour ahead of Eastern Time. It appears that the time stamp is now 3 hours ahead of Eastern Time. Am I correct on this?
That's correct, the new server is sitting in the Pacific time zone, not central, I can tell the server to adjust it back to Central if that bothers people.
It's not a big deal for me. I'm sure that since folks on this site are from all over the world, everyone pretty much does the math in their head to figure what time it is where they are versus the time where others are posting from.
While doing my last posts I realized why so many have been repeating their recent posts. When you click on 'post new reply' you get the error message that implies your post was not successful and that you should go back and try again. I did, and later realized that the post realy did go through, and I should just ignore the error message. I guess this issue will go away next week as you stated earlier.
Thanks,
I've posted a separate thread in the website discussion forum with info about any known issues at this point. These minor things should be fixed up in the next couple of days.
Actually the change-over happened pretty seamlessly over the weekend, I was pleased with the results. I'll have to have our new host announce themselves as they did great work to get this going on short notice.
K-man S well done. Thanks for all the support and for keeping us under one roof. I hope Porsche reads this and sends you a very generous site contribution (no kidding). After all I can honestly say that thanks to this site, I decided to order the cayman. Words that speak for itself.
hasta la vista
COCO
Cocodrilo,
I hope Porsche reads your message loud and clear that it wasn't any marketing or sales effort on their part but rather this site that convinced you to buy the Cayman S. I should get a commission, but don't! /fckeditor/editor/images/smiley/MWPX/tounge_smile.gif. I'm just glad to be of service!
