fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

997.1 S vs 996 C4S

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH997.1 S vs 996 C4S

Leading reported evidence

Check on cap

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Than mine prompted me to have a quick check on CAP.

997.1 S vs 996 C4S
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Check on cap' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check on cap' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 15 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Fill boots

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Hartech'd 997s manual at £22.5k, fill your boots!

997.1 S vs 996 C4S
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check on cap

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Than mine prompted me to have a quick check on CAP.

997.1 S vs 996 C4S

Fill boots

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Hartech'd 997s manual at £22.5k, fill your boots!

997.1 S vs 996 C4S
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T042512Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

A recent facebook post which many of us will have seen has got me thinking. 997.1 S Manual is advertised for sale at £23,500 with 55k and the benefit of full Hartech rebuild plus full OPC history. But to look at, it just doesn't do it for me like my C4S.. In any case with a bit of head over heart logic, I was thinking - good upgrade? Step closer to a 996 Turbo? (Ref. my previous post). 997 3.8 - tick Manual - tick Hartech - tick, tick Basalt Black - tick '05 - tick (mines '04) 55k miles - tick 996 - just looks mad from any rear angle and I also love the 'Turbo-esque' front end (and the sports seats!!) Values at the moment seem all over the place: Valued On: 18/10/2018 PORSCHE 911 [996] CARRERA 4 COUPE (01-04 ) [22337] S 2dr Tiptronic S (01-04 ) NO VRM 88000 Retail: £24,250 Trade: £19,850 Valued On: 18/10/2018 PORSCHE 911 [997] CARRERA COUPE (04-08 ) [28976] S 2dr (04-08 ) NO VRM 59544 Retail: £24,250 Trade: £20,200 Obviously Hartech rebuild goes a long way, but.. STUNNED!! :?:

POST 2Original post

Its the madness of Porsche buyers. I've been surprised to see where 997s are vs 996s. The same reason that 964s were sub £10k. There is a time when a Porsche is just out of date and unloved, between the new ones and the old ones thought of as classics, but then becomes talked of as a 'classic' itself and becomes in vogue. Hartech'd 997s manual at £22.5k, fill your boots! I know what you mean though, the 996 4S is just a bit more of a character to me. Another case in point... over on 911 Virgin... a stunning 15k miles manual V10 R8, yours for £64k. If I had the money I would buy that like a shot, and only £6k more than a boggo highish miles 993C2 Coupe at £58k (of which ropier examples would have been £15k not that long ago!) There is no rationality to car pricing, simply what people are prepared to pay.

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Agree with all of that and I am not sure that the trade values represent what is really happening out there (although they should do). In reality, I would value mine at less than the book says realistically and the 997 at more than the guide - especially given the difference in miles. Cannot believe suggested dealer retail is identical for the 2 vehicles with their respective miles. Although the fact I would be reluctant to part with mine tells me something else.. :dont know:

POST 4Original post

Is it full Hartech rebuild? That does sound very appealing with it being the 3.8. When I bought my C4s afew years back it was around same price point as a 3.6 997 Carrera. The 997 was rather tired and didn't appeal to me especially the interior however Id be thinking long and hard over a 3.8s if it were me. I think the 997 with some subtle tweaks are lovely and with is being an S it will be the widebody as well. C4s is a lovely looker but manual and the larger 3.8 would possibly swing it if it were me.

POST 5Original post

That 997.1 is sounds like an absolute bargain!

POST 6Original post

I guess if you ask for opinions between the 996 and the 997 on the 996 sub forum your going to get slightly biased views :grin: I must clarify the 997.1 S isnt a wide body its the 4 and the 4S amongst others are the wide body to accomodate the AWD system. having said that the 997.1 S May be wider than the 996 or even 996 4S but is a narrow body 997 :wink: :roll: dam that sounds confusing :grin: I am very surprised at a Hartech rebuilt 3.8 997 at under 25k most are selling in the high 20K's its likely to have tatty bodywork or not a full hartech rebuild or else its just a bargain and someone will grab it quick. I do agree 996 and 997 prices are all over the place at the moment you see 996 for anything from 12k to 29k and 997.1 anything from 18k to 35k It does seem strange, my old 997.1 has just sold through a trader for 8K more than I paid for it 6 yrs ago and with twice the mileage theres no logic in the market at present. So all you can do is buy the 911 that you prefer whether its a 996 or a 997 and hope the ass doesnt drop out of either model . It seems with the GT and Turbo cars due to recent years huge overinflated pricing theres some price adjustment starting to happen , this may inpart be why we are seeing such a strange market with the Carreras currently . :thumb:

POST 7Original post

Fair point about 996 forum bias, and its testament to what a lovely bunch 996 owners are that we are all agreed that a 997 S is a great car! But actually you've had it in other marques too... the F360M can be had for less than F355 like for like, and there is a cross-over between E46/E90 M3s Maybe a demographic factor... as a car ages it then falls into the wish list of those that coveted when new but can afford them now. As such, the 996 4S wave is happening now, the 997 wave will happen theoretically in 2 yrs or so...

POST 8 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Yes full £11k plus rebuild :thumb:

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi Phil. Interesting comments. Yes, I suppose a bit of loyalty for the 996 in this sub-forum, however the very similar values with this particular 997 having much better mileage, engine, history etc. Than mine prompted me to have a quick check on CAP. Very tempted myself even if it is in Scotland, however the 'S' just lacks the character that mine has.. Dare I say, it's a bit dull!! I was even thinking if I owned it I would de-badge the rear whereas with my 4S I am reluctant to do so as the branding & rear-end just does look good..

POST 10 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Phil, I don't think a 997 NB is wider than a 996 4S :dont know: Probs what the drawback is for me, love a nice skinny waste and a fat ass :grin:

POST 12 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi mate, no I haven't and I would be surprised if it's not better to drive and let's not forget it's also manual whereas mines a Tip (with paddles!). I am referring to the look of the car. Not knocking it at all hence the post.

POST 13Original post

No I wasnt saying it was as I really dont know, but I was correcting a post that said the 997.1S was a wide body only for claricication not to be pedantic :thumb: phew lucky for me I only have one of the attributes you love :grin: :grin: :grin:

POST 14Original post

theres no doubt that the 996 4S badge with the partial cut in S and the red band is bloody lovely and sadly the 997.2 which saw a return of the red band the 996 4S with cut in S just doesnt sit as well as well when added to the 997.2 but the 997.2 4S badge just isnt as nice as the 996 one. maybe why we see so many rebadges as just 911

POST 15 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I see what you mean! :floor: :floor:

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.