fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

Rear main inspection question...

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
7 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHRear main inspection question...

Leading reported evidence

Check pressure plate and thrust bearing....just

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If it were I would would offer to pay for new clutch, check the pressure plate and thrust bearing....just to make sure its in top condition....but pray that your new RMS doesn't leak

Rear main inspection question...
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Check pressure plate and thrust bearing....just' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check pressure plate and thrust bearing....just' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 7 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check pressure plate and thrust bearing....just

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If it were I would would offer to pay for new clutch, check the pressure plate and thrust bearing....just to make sure its in top condition....but pray that your new RMS doesn't leak

Rear main inspection question...
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T025149Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

2007 2.7 with 27k miles. I've had this car for 2 weeks. It was found in the ppi that the rear main was "seeping" at the bellhousing. Where did they see this from? I would like to start keeping tabs on this for a couple months before I take it in here in my territory. Is there an inspection cover that looks in the bellhousing. Do some of those plastic covers on the bottom have to come off? I just want to be prepared when I get it up in the air.. Thanks, C.

POST 2Original post

I would forget monitoring this and take it in while it's still under warranty!!!!!! You would have to have the car up and look where the transmission joins the engine. Should be exposed without removing covers. There is a place the oil will drip that can be seen pretty easily. Look a the picture here: Cayman Register According to the techs at Porsche of Arlington, oil shows up here every time there are RMS problems.

POST 3Original post

Go to your servicing dealer immediate, first to minimize the amount of oil on your clutch and second to ensure that PNA pays for repair. If it were I would would offer to pay for new clutch, check the pressure plate and thrust bearing....just to make sure its in top condition....but pray that your new RMS doesn't leak

POST 4Original post

Engine ID number... Looking at my PPI report, it says my engine ID # is 65704730. On the LN Engineering site, that corresponds to an earlier Boxster double row type bearing and the M96.22 and .21 engine. My car has a build date of 09/06. Is it possible I don't have the newest version of the IMS bearing? Thanks, C. Edit: I just recorded the number from the crankcase: M972065704730 This is better news but I saw for myself that the area around the bellhousing is "stained" but not actually wet. I will get it in. But, do I want to see inside with my own eyes? Do I want to see if the Main is dry and the IMS wet. Or is the Main causing it and I should remain hopeful on the IMS?

POST 5Original post

Re: Engine ID number... hopefully the warranty is in place....but from what I can tell a dealer can best tell you about your car and what may, or may not have been done to it...

POST 6Original post

After reading so much about the LN Engineering retro fits, I can't help but be anxious. My warranty is up next May so I feel like this is a one shot deal now. Things like the IMS upgrade from LNE or seal modification to stock would require a tear down same as stock IMS seal service. I just want to do this right. Please, someone correct me if I'm wrong. C.

POST 7Original post

I agree with you...you want to build the record that encourages your dealer to support you in problem area and PNA doesn't seem to share alot of info....but if you support the dealer...so he will be your advocate...I would hope that is best

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.