fullymatted.
Back to search
PistonHeads

Boxster buying - decisions decisions... - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
6 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHBoxster buying - decisions decisions... - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK

Leading reported evidence

Use daily

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

I'm a bit stuck though now - the car will be in London and won't be used daily.

Boxster buying - decisions decisions... - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use daily' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use daily' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 6 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use daily

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

I'm a bit stuck though now - the car will be in London and won't be used daily.

Boxster buying - decisions decisions... - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • PistonHeads: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T124918Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I've got agreement from the Mrs to buy a new car, and after looking at 997.1s and being frightened off by the bore scoring issues (as well as buying at the bottom of the heap) we've settled on a Boxster. I'm a bit stuck though now - the car will be in London and won't be used daily. It will probably do 2 trackdays a year (although if consumables end up being silly, I'll end up hiring a Caterham for the few days we do). I'd like an S, as I think I'd always be wondering otherwise. The budget is about £20k (this is the ideal figure, although it could be pushed a little). As I see it, I have 3 choices (plus 1 off the wall choice): 987.1 3.2s (manual) , ideally with PASM and a few toys if I can find one. This would be well below budget (I wouldn't go up to my budget for one), but maybe getting on a bit. A bit of cash in the bank is always nice. I understand these engines don't have the risk of bore scoring (but have IMS issues, albeit fixable). 987.1 3.4s (manual) , PASM would be nice, a bit more grunt but easily available in budget. Bore scoring issues a possibility (although perhaps blown out of proportion online - however, if I'm worrying the person I sell too might be too). 987.2 3.4s (manual or pdk) - probably lower spec and I would be really pushing the budget into the next level. They look like great value though at £25k or so and engine seems to be thought of as much more reliable. The off the wall choice follows on from the 987.2... don't get anything, save my money and add to the pot and try to get a 981 3.4s or GTS in a year's time. I find the 981 much better looking, but I'd be missing a lot of driving time while I save up. Is the improved package worth the sacrifice (I'd also probably be looking at financing part to get the right car). I'm sure loads of you will have had similar thoughts... any ideas?

POST 2Original post

The 981 has electric steering compared to the hydraulic on the 987. Would that make a difference for you on your track days? I guess you'd have to drive them back to back to see if the difference is a factor for you, but probably worth doing. If I were you I'd go for the 3.2 987.1 and whack a TPC racing turbo on it. GT3 performance for a fraction of the cost.

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I hadn't considered the steering rack changes, so would have to try one - although tracking it is very much secondary to normal road use. The turbo sounds bonkers, but not for me this time!

POST 4Original post

Apart from the e-steering already mentioned, the 981 is considered by many to be too tall geared, the brakes to be over-servoed and generally more comfort based than the 987's. Your best option is the 987.2, but they are becoming more sought after and consequently more scarce.

POST 5Original post

981 is a truly enormous leap forward. Has to be driven to be believed.

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks for all of the thoughts/advice. I'm steering clear of the 987.1 3.4S - its just not worth the risk. Given the £10k difference (at least) between the 987.1 3.2S and 987.2 3.4S I'm minded to go for the earlier/cheaper model and keep a bit of money in the bank to sort any niggles (and the bilstein damptronic shocks look amazing too). Hopefully with the 3.2S being cheaper I'd 'only' lost a few grand if I decide to sell and get a 981 in a year or so.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.