15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996TT - just collected and drove it home.
Leading reported evidence
Run risk of heading into a hedge backwards
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
And you don't want to find youself having to suddenly lift of the gas mid-corner because you have gone in too fast or find something blocking you way - if you do, you run the risk of heading into a hedge backwards which is not a good look
Leading evidence: 'Run risk of heading into a hedge backwards' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run risk of heading into a hedge backwards' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Run risk of heading into a hedge backwards
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
And you don't want to find youself having to suddenly lift of the gas mid-corner because you have gone in too fast or find something blocking you way - if you do, you run the risk of heading into a hedge backwards which is not a good look
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T133652Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
My first 911 is now sitting in the garage - fans whirring and engine ticking as it cools down from a 70 mile drive home.
Cripes it moves (530hp DMS remap).
I just wanted to ask: There is more tramlining than I was expecting. I know the tyres are very wide but I was thinking of getting a laser alignment done. How noticeable should the tramlining be - front and rear (I'm feeling both)??
Anyway, no doubt I will get used to that either way. Otherwise, it's fantastic. I will put some pictures up in the next couple of days after a polish/wax job.
Welcome ... I'm no expert but suspect that the tramlining is either tyres or geometry - someone will be along soon and point you in the right direction
Tramlining on my car has improved a lot since having the geometry setup to a more aggressive fast road/track setup (Parr stage 1).
I've been on pilot sports since owning the car so it can only be the geo that's improved things.
Congratulations on getting the car 8)
It's a compromise between sharp handling and tyre wear I believe? The tyres are all brand new (well, about 500 miles old) and Contis all round so not those.
Thanks for the congrats. I will post pics, I promise. Probably too many
Car had been sat for a few weeks in a garage. When I checked this morning the fronts were down to 30psi and the rears around 37 - no doubt that is part of the problem. I will test drive later and see what difference it makes now I have returned them to correct pressure.
Correct pressures stopped the tramlining altogether but the car was still really skittish on corners. Turned out to be running insufficient negative camber front and rear - a total lof 6 adjustments and £185 later and it's back on rails where it belongs. What a machine. It's actually kind of nice to have paid my first bill, feels like I've joined the club. (I'm sure the novelty wears off :?: )
We love a good result! :thumbs:
Think I'm correct in saying that when going into a corner you need some weight on the front wheels so remember 'slow in and fast out'. Once you see the exit that's the time to step on the gas and get the back hunkered down.
And you don't want to find youself having to suddenly lift of the gas mid-corner because you have gone in too fast or find something blocking you way - if you do, you run the risk of heading into a hedge backwards which is not a good look
