7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 Pricing
Leading reported evidence
Use car market
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I think for such a high mileage early 996 model car, $42K is way too much; especially without history and a bad used-car market.
Leading evidence: 'Use car market' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check on kbb and edmunds and wasn't sure' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I also checked on KBB and Edmunds and wasn't sure which (if any) was the definitive answer.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
To be fair, there is one that didn't fetch a bid higher than $37K, but reserve looked like it was set way too high which tends to drive people away.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T183130Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I currently own a 964 cab and am looking to add another car. I am looking at a 1999 996 Cab. It is black/black with the hardtop option. 71K miles with no history. 6 speed, leather, dual power seats, sports package (?), Cd player and 18" wheels.
Because there is no history, what should I be looking for? Also, is $42K a fair price?
I think for such a high mileage early 996 model car, $42K is way too much; especially without history and a bad used-car market. My best estimate, based on Excellence magazine's guidelines, would be in the low 30s.
I'm surprised to say that I'd have to disagree with FlyingToaster, which sort of bums me out too since I'm in the market for a 99 coupe. In the past, I have found that edmunds.com "Trade-In" value is just about dead on for the price in which 75% or so of the sellers tell me to take a hike. {In otherwords, the right price!} For the car you're looking at, it's trade-in is coming up as $45,993. {base of $47K - $2K for 71K - $100 color + $700 options} Sounds like you might have a fair deal. But given no history ... double check it is really clean ... no accidents, abuse, etc.
Good luck!
Pete,
Thanks for the input. I also checked on KBB and Edmunds and wasn't sure which (if any) was the definitive answer.
I am in SoCal and the car is in the Big Apple. Anyone know of a good shop/mechanic in NY to perform a PPI? Thanks.
FWIW, a little more data.
<a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1872667077" target="_blank">Here's</a> one on Ebay that sold for $47,900. Not a convertable, but aero package ... and less miles. Seems to support the price you have.
To be fair, there is one that didn't fetch a bid higher than $37K, but reserve looked like it was set way too high which tends to drive people away.
[quote]Originally posted by adscab911:
<strong>
I am in SoCal and the car is in the Big Apple. Anyone know of a good shop/mechanic in NY to perform a PPI? Thanks.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Word of advice. Get the VIN, I think any dearler can lookup the history. Hopefully someone can help you out. Then, DO NOT get the PPI done where it has been serviced. This doesn't tell you where to go, I know, but it will help you get an honest opinion. I had a PPI done with a non-seller recommendation. Unfortunately, this person had worked on the car and knew the owner. I did not get an honest appraisal. I can't really blame him as I was a one-time customer and this other guy dumped a lot of money with him.
