911uk

Fearnsport Map (or Remaps in general)

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

5 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHFearnsport Map (or Remaps in general)

Leading reported evidence

Use search function

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I left a thread a few weeks ago asking about e-maps and had a limited response and have used the search function.
Original post Read captured discussion
Fearnsport Map (or Remaps in general)

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use search function' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use search function' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 5 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use search function

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I left a thread a few weeks ago asking about e-maps and had a limited response and have used the search function.
Original post Read captured discussion
Fearnsport Map (or Remaps in general)

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T133652Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I know there are a few of you guys out there with remaps and I was wondering where you had it done and your experience. I left a thread a few weeks ago asking about e-maps and had a limited response and have used the search function. My darling partner has treated me for father's day to a driving experience down at Silverstone (I am in Manchester) and am extremely interested in co-inciding it with a remap at Fearnsport. Andy was most helpful on the phone. My car is an X50. Boost kicks in at the normal 4,000rpm, fairly laggy (as I hear is typical of the car with this packagae) but VERY fast. Does anyone have their Turbo or X50 remapped by them? I am very interested in hearing about your experience and results and the characteristics of the car post-remap... Thanks.

POST 2Original post

Had my K16 done at FS. Absolute no brainer. Go see Matt, pass on my regards then post back here when you get home and tell us how good you think it is.

POST 3Original post

If you are in Manchester speak to Wayne Schofield at Chipwizards, very well regarded and located in milnrow/rochdale, has a rolling road and will map your car specifically to your needs.

POST 4Original post

Plenty of posts about mapping options, and I've posted a fair bit about my FS X50 map. As Gez says, speak to Matt and you won't go wrong. No-one knows the turbo better - you're in good hands.

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Cheers guys I will give Wayne a bell too and see what's best for me. Will obviously put a post up when I take the plunge.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.