fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

Look what just arrived at my office!!! Slightly exciting!!

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHLook what just arrived at my office!!! Slightly exciting!!

Leading reported evidence

Test drives unless i'm actually seriously looking

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I don't do test-drives unless I'm actually seriously looking to buy - I'm quite impulsive (the missus will testify; she went on holiday once to a Golf GTI on the drive and returned to a bright yellow 350Z, never mind her shock when a brand new £2k piano turned up last year while I was out at work

Look what just arrived at my office!!! Slightly exciting!!
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Test drives unless i'm actually seriously looking' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test drives unless i'm actually seriously looking' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 15 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Test drives unless i'm actually seriously looking

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I don't do test-drives unless I'm actually seriously looking to buy - I'm quite impulsive (the missus will testify; she went on holiday once to a Golf GTI on the drive and returned to a bright yellow 350Z, never mind her shock when a brand new £2k piano turned up last year while I was out at work

Look what just arrived at my office!!! Slightly exciting!!
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Outcome without a verified action link

I've still not seen one in the flesh but the more pics I see of the Sport Classic the more I love it.

No unique explicit quoted action; no causal link assigned

Generation: 20261027T033922Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi all Maybe you will be interested, I certainly was, to see what turned up at my office today! I have never seen one in the flesh "before and although I was not when I saw the press pics I sure am now SURE it looks awesome up close! Enjoy!

POST 2Original post

I saw one in my OPC when i was in for a service. LUSH, really nice. wheels especially stunning, whole interior is a delight. But..... would you really get this over a turbo s? :evil:

POST 3Original post

Wrong forum - we have no interest in this vehicle whatsoever! Your red C4S - now that IS exciting! :wink:

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Yes and no Yes on the grounds of re-sale and exclusivity No on Value for Money looks fab though, can not wait to hear it start up, is it loaded then usual? I would hope so!

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Sounded very tame when he left! : Nooo:

POST 7Original post

Thanks for posting the pics, great rear view!!! :thumbs:

POST 8Original post

I've still not seen one in the flesh but the more pics I see of the Sport Classic the more I love it. Price = big no-no but it looks utterly fantastic, it's pretty much a Porsche you buy with your heart rather than with your head, and I don't think you could say that about many 911s in the last 20 years or so... :cloud9:

POST 9Original post

Buy a C4S + X51 + PSE and add Fuchs/Duck tail/Front Apron/Rear PU/SportsClassic exhaust tips. I have it in Rivi. Thanks. You won't get the brown woven (?) leather interior though. You won't get the dials. :sad: No double-bubble if you DIY. However, DIY = no six-figures either.

POST 11Original post

You could buy a C4S and spend £200k on it but it still won't be a Sport Classic and you know it. Face it, we're all suckers for whatever Porsche / Porsche GB try and sting us for, we just can't afford one... :sad:

POST 12Original post

Well if my next car isn't a GT3, it will be a SportClassic-alike. I promise I won't badge it up though :wink: The looks will be 99% (except roof) and the performance will be the same (except 4WD drive train).

POST 13Original post

Mine will be an Aston V8 Vantage roadster. Even if it does drive like a tank. Each to their own...

POST 14Original post

Technically, my statement was incorrect. It should say "next Porsche". My "next car" may be an MB. PS - have you driven the V8 Vantage? PM anotherGT2 and uuf361 to save yourself the grief.

POST 15Original post

Oh, I know, I know - I've seen the posts on here, on Pistonheads and on numerous other forums, but to be honest I potter around in the 996 about 95% of the time and I figure I might as well do that in something that looks (and sounds) like the Vantage than anything else, it can't be that bad a drive. I don't do test-drives unless I'm actually seriously looking to buy - I'm quite impulsive (the missus will testify; she went on holiday once to a Golf GTI on the drive and returned to a bright yellow 350Z, never mind her shock when a brand new £2k piano turned up last year while I was out at work ), if I drove a Vantage this weekend it would be on the drive next week... :roll:

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.