19 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH911 HUL - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Replace 1900.html
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
911 HUL - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Replace 1900.html' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace 1900.html' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
911 HUL - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
19 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261028T003752Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
DasChin said:
GB plate was on a mexico blue 997 GT3 gen 2
I think it might be on the white 991 GT3 now
Interesting - I saw a white 991 GT3 about 4 weeks ago in the same place that I saw the Turbo today. Never saw the plate though.
Iconic plates and will conjure a different image depending on your generation.
For me this is 911 HUL...
(Silverstone 86/87)
Look at all the scrap in the rest of the picture!!
This is why supercars in the 1980's had a bigger bang than supercars do today.
Edited by 5517 on Friday 9th January 22:33
hondansx said:
You make a good point. Although, that 911 looks feckin dreadful.
You young whipper snapper!!!
I could hardly sleep when that car was current. The stuff dreams are made of.
It was circa £110k new 29 years ago.
That's £290K in 2015 Money.
ww.thisismoney.co.uk/money/bills/article-1633409/Historic-inflation-calculator-value-money-changed-1900.html
vid of the blue 997 GT3 with the 911 GB plate:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CElOzxM7mU
and on the 991 GT3 in white:
http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=991+gt3+911+GB...
on the 991 GT3 RS when it comes out in a few months??
saying that its been on a 997 GT2 it seems (but as a rule on the NA cars):
http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=911+GB&qpv...
for me the 911 HUL plate will always be the iconic 993 turbo in that dark cherry colour:
http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=1997+Porsche+9...
http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=993+Porsche+91...
basically if you see 911 HUL or 911 GB you know its a Porsche GB official press car.
god 80s Porsche. they were just awful and they really lost their way then compared to the 70s gems
Edited by DasChin on Saturday 10th January 08:16
5517 said:
hondansx said:
You make a good point. Although, that 911 looks feckin dreadful.
You young whipper snapper!!!
I could hardly sleep when that car was current. The stuff dreams are made of.
It was circa £110k new 29 years ago.
That's £290K in 2015 Money.
ww.thisismoney.co.uk/money/bills/article-1633409/Historic-inflation-calculator-value-money-changed-1900.html
There are some truly awful cars in the background.
Previous to that 911 GB on an Aqua Blue 997.2 GT3 Club Sport reg Nov 2009.
DasChin said:
GB plate was on a mexico blue 997 GT3 gen 2
I think it might be on the white 991 GT3 now
I remember seeing that car at Newmarket races once. Grew up there and used to see loads of great cars in the car park..
5517 said:
Iconic plates and will conjure a different image depending on your generation.
For me this is 911 HUL...
(Silverstone 86/87)
Look at all the scrap in the rest of the picture!!
This is why supercars in the 1980's had a bigger bang than supercars do today.
Edited by 5517 on Friday 9th January 22:33
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
