14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH911 turbo
Leading reported evidence
Check they were manufactured in 2004/2005, my error
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Ahh just checked they were manufactured in 2004/2005, my error.
Leading evidence: 'Check they were manufactured in 2004/2005, my error' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check they were manufactured in 2004/2005, my error' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I have also found that a car that is used daily rarther than sitting for weeks in a garage has far less in the way of problems.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T005001Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
http://www.autobahn.co.uk/used-porsche/car-details.aspx?id=7701
,anyone now this car,looking at it this week,my only concern is the mileage,she looks mint 8),link playing up,its the 60,000 mile turbo :dont know:
And I turned one down in the same colour combo at £60K with 2 year Porsche warranty because it had done 38K :?:
Check out OPC Sutton Coldfield's site, I think it'll be a better deal
I've seen this car in the flesh about 2 months ago and looked tidy. I think they might have reduced it as it was up for somewhere near £34k.
Got a mate with a 996tt x50 with 30k on the clock and my 996tt x50 with 65k+ drives the same if not better. Service history is a must.
Looks good, black is a great colour, I am no expert but I noticed from one of the pictures its badged as a Turbo S, I thought they were only produced in 2005 and had the creamic brakes with the yellow calipers, which this does not appear to have?
Ahh just checked they were manufactured in 2004/2005, my error.
Yep got to say following (well more like trying to keep up with!) Yohan yesterday his car is certainly no slouch! and you'd never believe it had 65k on the clock as its immaculate both cosmetically and mechanically.
Great colour combo, mileage seems to be a bit high but if any sports car can do it, it's a porsche.(Service history a must).
I have also found that a car that is used daily rarther than sitting for weeks in a garage has far less in the way of problems.
No error. It isn't an S. Someone has done a "vanity upgrade". The badge has been added afterwards - you can tell that because it is way over to the right hand side.
Also, it hasn't got ceramics, which were standard on the S.
i enquired over the weekend,they phone text me this morning saying it was sold,oh well ill keep looking,not a x50 then,thats interesting hope the new owner knows :roll:
It could still have been an X50, just not a real Turbo S, the Turbo S had a number of extras included as standard including the factory X50 option and ceramic brakes. I did think the S part of the badge looked strange.
A quick look on the options sticker under the bonnet would show the option code 'X50' if installed.
I do find it strange that a specialist dealer choose to keep the vanity badge fitted in the photos even though it was just listed as an X50, it was misleading to a buyer who did not know the difference as technically the Turbo S is a more desirable version of the 996 Turbo and one that will command a higher premium that a 996 X50.
I looked at a Turbo X50 at the weekend 2003. That had the sticker under the bonnet, and in the book. With the all important X50 code and many others that will need deciphering.
Not only did i look at it, I bought it too.
