fullymatted.
Back to search
PistonHeads

Pro-9 Anyone know them - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
6 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHPro-9 Anyone know them - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Leading reported evidence

Run standard engine through

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

Although they are stating Max rpm to be around 5.8k, saying that look what happened when i ran my standard engine through to 6.2k at brunters

Pro-9 Anyone know them - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run standard engine through' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run standard engine through' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 6 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run standard engine through

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

Although they are stating Max rpm to be around 5.8k, saying that look what happened when i ran my standard engine through to 6.2k at brunters

Pro-9 Anyone know them - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • PistonHeads: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T105141Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

I see by your post to Bigairbox that you have decided to go-ahead with the Pro-9 engine. Is this a fully rebuilt and upgraded engine? The price sounds pretty good, what did they do to it? and finally......will we see it at the next Bruntingthorpe?

POST 2 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

It is a fully rebuilt engine - lightened and balanced all over the place. approx 188bhp (from a 2.5 lux engine) there are further improvement (approx another 20bhp) to be had later with new ECU's etc but they have suggested taking the stock engine and putting a thousand miles on it first. And yep it will be out at the next brunters day, with the rest of my upgrades aswell - spending this weekend working on the brakes then it's off to the engine shop in a couple of weeks for the new lump

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Apparently excellent torque delivery. from right down at 2.5k rpm Although they are stating Max rpm to be around 5.8k, saying that look what happened when i ran my standard engine through to 6.2k at brunters >> Edited by dontlift on Friday 2nd May 14:11

POST 5Original post

Was over revving it what caused your engine problems, or did something wear out or a gasket let go? Hopefully a rebuild will rule that out again

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Ok, Well after the weekends fun, and having now (with alot of sticky tape and glue) breathed life back into my 944's engine, although it is still in very intensive care - and does not sound very healthy + plus i seem to have more oil leaks than cylinders. I reckon with tender driving it may have another couple of thousand miles in it - but that will be about it. So new engine it is. I have spoken with Pro-9 in birmingham about their 944 porsche race engines and the price etc sounds right - 188bhp and strong torque curve. even some warranty on it. Basically just looking to know if anyone else has had any dealings or better still if anyone has had one of their engines????? >>> Edited by dontlift on Tuesday 29th April 21:52

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.