15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPorsche N Rated Tyres are a con...
Leading reported evidence
Install tomorrow so who am i
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Mind you, I'm having cups fitted tomorrow so who am I .....
Leading evidence: 'Install tomorrow so who am i' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install tomorrow so who am i' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Contacted my insurer and they could not care less if they are N rated, in the process of chnaging tyres...see my Bridgestone thread..so i could save myself a small fortune by not having N rated tyres..i also use the car daily and never track it
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I also use my car every day, and there are sections when I can get pretty close to 150.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Contacted my insurer and they could not care less if they are N rated, in the process of chnaging tyres...see my Bridgestone thread..so i could save myself a small fortune by not having N rated tyres..i also use the car daily and never track it
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T213932Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I've been gathering advice and info from this site since purchasing my first 911 C4 about 18months ago. Since purchase I have been ripping through various N rated tyres in about 8K miles on the rear. After dusting off my last pair of Michelin Pro Sport 2's which cost £505 i started to question this whole N rating thing. Did a bit of research on here, nothing conclusive so thought sod it and took the plunge on a pair of Falcon F453's at a mere £270 for the pair. Nearly half the price of the Michelins and 9K miles in still got loads of tread, at least 5mm, and handle just as well on public roads as any N rated tyre i've tried. Probably wouldn't recommend them on the track but if you use your 911 as a daily driver like me, save yourself a small fortune and go for the Falcon's! They look good as well.
Thought i'd share this with you all as this forum has helped me out a few times!
Cheers
DoubleD
mmmm..... interesting thread but I guess it comes down to driving style.
I also use my car every day, and there are sections when I can get pretty close to 150. There are also sections when I can hoof it around fairly tight bends. Not sure I'd want to compromise on that type of speed and handling without an N rated tyre, but I'm not familiar with the Falcon's.
Would be interested to learn whether you've opened it up on the motorway at all, or whether you've really tested them on a hairy bend??
Mind you, I'm having cups fitted tomorrow so who am I ..... ??
lol!!
I've done plenty of track days on non-N-rated tyres, I don't have any doubts that non-N-rated tyres can be equal or superior to N-rated.
And yes I think N-rating is a bit misleading, but its been discussed here dozens of times ...
Interesting....whilst having my PPI prior to purchasing the 996tt I was told that the car had 1 non N rated tyre which needs to be change? I was told that som eInsurance comps insist on it....not sure how true it is as £230+ a corner is getting expensive.
Cheers
I called my insurers (Aviva) before I switched to non-N rated tyres, and they told me that as long as the tyres were the same size, speed, and load rating there was no problem at all. Glad I switched. Instead of the 4000 miles I was getting from the Contis on the rear, I have now got over 4000 on the Yokos and they look good for another 5-6000 at least.
Contacted my insurer and they could not care less if they are N rated, in the process of chnaging tyres...see my Bridgestone thread..so i could save myself a small fortune by not having N rated tyres..i also use the car daily and never track it
