10 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH1973 911 set up - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Set 1970 2.2s perfectly
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
1973 911 set up - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Set 1970 2.2s perfectly' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Set 1970 2.2s perfectly' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
The use will be summer in the UK and trips to the alps.
1973 911 set up - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T142254Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I was hoping to ask if anyone had any advice on the suspension set up for a car. It’s a 1973 T that’s had a full nut and bolt restoration. Luckily it had the magnesium engine case and so it could be rebuilt to 2.7RS spec.
The use will be summer in the UK and trips to the alps. It’s already been over once and performed well. The front tyres have had some uneven wear and it’d be useful for some advice on the initial set up settings and then it can be refined further. A local guy who regularly sets up Ford Escorts for racing will do the job initially. Although very respectful of centre gravity and their work, I think it’s reasonable to do an initial set up and then review the response.
To set up, and maintain, the integrity of the front end on the 911s of this era, you should fit a strut brace.
They benefit from the extra torsional rigidity.
Nice car
I had my suspension (1972 911T) completely refreshed, upgraded including polybushed and set up all by Tuthill a couple of years ago. Highly recommended.
Many Ts of that era (like mine) did not come with rear anti-roll bar (ARB) and would therefore need brackets welding on, while the front comes with the fittings so the ARB can bolt on.
There are very few companies I would have weld the brackets in place for the rear. Tuthill are excellent and know these early cars inside out.
Good luck.
Grantstown said:
I was hoping to ask if anyone had any advice on the suspension set up for a car. It’s a 1973 T that’s had a full nut and bolt restoration. Luckily it had the magnesium engine case and so it could be rebuilt to 2.7RS spec.
The use will be summer in the UK and trips to the alps. It’s already been over once and performed well. The front tyres have had some uneven wear and it’d be useful for some advice on the initial set up settings and then it can be refined further. A local guy who regularly sets up Ford Escorts for racing will do the job initially. Although very respectful of centre gravity and their work, I think it’s reasonable to do an initial set up and then review the response.
Hi
Best start from factory settings for these early cars,rake should be 1 to 1.5 deg,you need rear toe in which wont fight the front wheels,toe out is scary on the rear.1 mm of toe in on the front,depending on the tyres used what grip they generate on the car will highlight the flex in the car,standard tyres the car will be fine.
You dont give much info on new dampers/torsion bars/bushes,has it been on a jig etc.
Half tank of fuel always helps,enjoy great cars.
Car looks lovely. So you’ve got a 2.7 RS engine in your “T” ?! That’ll be a lot of fun. Who restored it for you ?
Car looks to have a lot of rake on it ? Seems like there is a fair gap between the rear wheel and the arch ?
Can’t really help on the set up as I am clueless about these things other than I took my ‘73 911 for a suspension set up to CG a few months after I bought it. Transformed the car. The car had previously had a suspension set up by a Porsche specialist who people speak of very highly on here. My car had too much rake and had been set up with too much rear toe and didn’t have enough compliance. That meant the rear wheels were fighting the front in corners and meant the steering was heavy. I clearly didn’t realise this until CG had worked their magic….
Edited by Cheib on Saturday 28th January 08:58
Cheib said:
Car looks lovely. So you’ve got a 2.7 RS engine in your “T” ?! That’ll be a lot of fun. Who restored it for you ?
Car looks to have a lot of rake on it ? Seems like there is a fair gap between the rear wheel and the arch ?
Can’t really help on the set up as I am clueless about these things other than I took my ‘73 911 for a suspension set up to CG a few months after I bought it. Transformed the car. The car had previously had a suspension set up by a Porsche specialist who people speak of very highly on here. My car had too much rake and had been set up with too much rear toe and didn’t have enough compliance. That meant the rear wheels were fighting the front in corners and meant the steering was heavy. I clearly didn’t realise this until CG had worked their magic….
Edited by Cheib on Saturday 28th January 08:58
https://www.leemayorrestorations.com/
I’ll send a PM regarding the settings if you don’t mind.
Discombobulate said:
+1 to Center(sic) of Gravity and Chris Franklin. Bespoke set up. Monet well spent. Set my 1970 2.2s perfectly.
Center Gravity
Not
Centre Gravity
Centre of Gravity
Center of Gravity
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.