13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996TT rough idle, codes & MOT emissions problem
Reported or suspected cause
on the 996 turbo forum
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
A good place to ask help on your issue is on the 996 turbo forum on FB, there is a guy on there called Markski who will know what your problem is.
Leading evidence: 'on the 996 turbo forum' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'on the 996 turbo forum' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check next' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
So I replaced with a brand new one which initially seemed to help but the problem quickly returned
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Anyone got experience of similar issues or any advice on what to check next ?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I could have just cleaned the filter and replaced the o-ring but decided to buy a new FPR as they're only around £40.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
2 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
The car then ran rough for the next 30ish miles before the CEL came back on again with the same codes as before.
My car has had an erratic idle problem for a while now which I've been struggling to track down. It runs quite rough when first started and the rpm dips too low and almost stalls after revving the engine or when coming to a fast stop. The idle problem also seems worse once the engine is warmed up.
I eventually got a CEL and read the following codes using Durametric:
P0171
Porsche fault code 360 - Oxygen sensing adaption idle range bank 1
P0174
Porsche fault code 361 - Oxygen sensing adaption idle range bank 2
Things seemed much better after the CEL came on but went back to running rough and erratic idle once I cleared the fault codes. The car then ran rough for the next 30ish miles before the CEL came back on again with the same codes as before. This cycle can be repeated by clearing the codes again.
I initially suspected unmetered air entering the system via a loose hose so did a boost leak test. However I pressurised the system from just behind the air box and it held pressure fine so I don't think that's the issue.
The issue also goes away if I unplug the MAF which led me to suspect that was knackered. So I replaced with a brand new one which initially seemed to help but the problem quickly returned
This has been a minor annoyance for a while but has now turned into a major problem as the car failed the MOT emissions test today with CO and HC values well over the limit and lambda of 0.947 which is just under the acceptable range. The car has been mapped and has a Speedtech exhaust with 100 cell CATs but this has been the case for the last 2 MOTs without issue so I'm sure the failure this time is related to the above problems.
Anyone got experience of similar issues or any advice on what to check next ?
Unfortunately I don't know the answer to your problem, however I wouldn't boost leak the just after the airbox as that is the low pressure side. The boost leak test should be done and the outlet of the turbo. A good place to ask help on your issue is on the 996 turbo forum on FB, there is a guy on there called Markski who will know what your problem is. :thumbs:
Thanks for the advice. I've ordered one of the kits from Markski which will allow me to leak test from down at the turbos rather than behind the airbox. I also think this approach will identify problems that testing from behind the airbox doesn't (eg. #16 check valve).
Did you ask him what he thinks the problem could be? I hope you don't have to change the #16 check valve, I had to change mine 2 years ago and it was a pain to get to. Good luck :thumb:
I've asked the question on the FB group so will see if anyone's got any ideas there. Just waiting for the testing kit to arrive from the Markski so I can properly leak test. Fingers crossed it will be something simple!
The fault codes relate to a weak mixture on both banks , the car is adding more fuel to try and maintain Lambda but has reached the maximum amount of fuel it can add and so has flagged a code saying so.
All cars compensate for small leaks or general wear and tear , owners will never realise untill they go out of limits .
The car opens the injectors for longer to give it more fuel .
Lambda = correct fuel / air ratio.
So .. couple of things which you are already on top of ..
Air leak and on a Turbo theres all the intercoolers to consider as well so a smoke test there .
Maf sensor contaminated .. i would look at the voltage readings for the sensor but perhaps a clean of the sensor might be in order , actually you have replaced it so ignore that .
Any type of oil based air filter can cause issues with the maf .
Exhaust blow , air getting into the exhaust near the pre cat lambda sensors will confuse it .
There are other things but we are moving into the unusual category so ill not go there yet .
EDIT ..
When you clear the fault codes the car resets the adaptions .. it WILL run like a sack as its way to lean at that point .. the car will slowly adapt and give more fuel untill it reaches its limits and flags a code plus eml light .
Hi guys, pleased to say that I have finally resolved this problem
Turns out the issue with was the fuel pressure regulator (FPR) which was both clogged up with black gunk and also had a split o-ring. I could have just cleaned the filter and replaced the o-ring but decided to buy a new FPR as they're only around £40. Car now idles and drives perfectly
Credit goes to Carl Henley from the 996TT Facebook group who pointed me in the right direction on this one. Looks like he had the same symptoms a while back and found his FPR clogged with the same black gunk as mine. Thanks also to the guys who responded on here....I really appreciate the advice and you've saved me a load of time (and probably money) chasing this down :thumb:
I will post some pics of the old FPR below....hopefully this post will help somebody else with the same problem in the future.
It's not too difficult if you have a decent set of tools. You have to unscrew the secondary air pump and oil filler neck bracket and move them aside and that gives you access to the FPR. Once i had removed the retaining clip, I levered it out with spanner against the air line barb.
Reinstalling it is a little more difficult as it won't pop back in by hand. I had to use a long spanner and lever it back in against a solid section of the car body just behind it.
The biggest issue I had was dropping things into the abyss which is the engine bay!!!! Lost a couple of sockets down there and had to retrieve with a magnetic tool. Also you need some extension bars as it's difficult to get the socket wrench in between the maze of pipes and wires in there.
Definatly do-able by amateur mechanic
Hi Carl, didn't realise you were on here too
No I have never used any fuel cleaners on the car but the original FPR was put back on the car not long before the issue started. I was running a 5 bar FPR prior to that but put the stock one back in when we upgraded the injectors. I wonder if the o-ring got damaged at that point? Not sure where all that black stuff came from though!
Just really glad it was such a simple fix...thanks again for your help
:thumb:
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.